<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper <
<a href="mailto:felipe@felipegasper.com">felipe@felipegasper.com</a>> wrote:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Hi,
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the timestamp for each certificate?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
I’m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google’s lead and insist on CT.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Thank you!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
-Felipe Gasper
</div>
<div>
Mississauga, Ontario
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Hi!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
We are planning to add ocsp stapling support. At least Thunderbird supports must-staple attribute.
</div>
<div class="io-ox-signature">
---
<br>Aki Tuomi
</div>
</body>
</html>