[Dovecot] M-Box benchmark

[Timo Sirainen]

On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:55 +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> 
> UW-IMAP is even slower on EXPUNGE (factor 10 I guess, nearly on every 
> operation).
> 
> Dovecot with large files (2GB, e.g. new mails on the end) is really 
> perfect on EXPUNGE (when there are no large holes). It takes <1s to 
> EXPUNGE. 

I guess you mean when expunging new messages? Maybe that's because
UW-IMAP again reads and parses the whole mbox before getting to the
expunged message, while Dovecot directly begins from that message? Or
that's the only thing I can think of. I would have actually expected
UW-IMAP to be faster when expunging..

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070318/a004fdea/attachment.pgp