[Dovecot] proxy host specified as fqdn in userdb

[Timo Sirainen]

On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:27 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> 
> I don't know about that, but what I'm asking is..  how many people
> are allowing IMAP/POP3 connections (with authentication via user/pw)
> over non-secure (non-SSL/TLS) connections?  I wouldn't think there
> would be many nowadays, and that there would be less as time passes.
> If that assumption is true, then I would think proxying would be very
> common (at least within a host where the imap-login and imap processes
> are paired together doing SSL/TLS).

Yes, but that was the point. When proxying within a host you don't need
DNS resolving.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070328/97e83915/attachment.pgp