[Dovecot] Version numbering

[Gerard Seibert]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:46:40 +0300
Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:

> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version
> numbers. But any comments on which one is better:
> 
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.YYYYMMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
> 
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
> 
> With a) style the releases could be done by simply copying a nightly
> snapshot to releases/ directory and announcing the changes since the
> last release. I'm not sure if that's good or bad.

I vote fore style 'a'.


-- 
Gerard

A bachelor never quite gets over the idea that he is a thing of beauty
and a boy for ever.

	Helen Rowland
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070328/3ca67df3/attachment-0001.pgp