[Dovecot] Version numbering

[Brian T Glenn]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written:
> 
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)

I'd really prefer using type b versioning as then there is no ambiguity 
when attempting to build packages for dovecot. There are many examples 
in the Debian repository where exceptions to the versioning numbers had 
to be made in order to accomodate non-numeric versioning.

I think this can be made very clear on the website. If someone messes it 
up anyway, perhaps they should learn to read documentation before 
installing.

-- 
http://www.delink.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070328/af3dce0b/attachment-0001.pgp