[Dovecot] v1.1.rc8 released
Jost.Krieger+dovecot at rub.de
Tue Jun 3 12:55:54 EEST 2008
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:45:20AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:27:32AM +0200, Jost Krieger wrote:
> > That could lead to slight problems, like hardlinking totally unrelated
> > messages, e.g. empty messages. Some Headers like From:, To:, Date:,
> > Subject: should probably be identical.
> Message-ID perhaps? :-)
Yep, add that ...
> > For some consistency, just removing *locally* generated trace headers
> > before fingerprinting might lead to better results.
> That may still leave identical messages not hard-linked thus wasting space.
> Eg. if they come from MTA's that do recipient splitting, or messages that
> are routed via different systems. The Received headers will be different
> but the body generally identical.
True, but these headers are quite important sometimes.
> I think a better solution is what was suggested here before, ie. to keep
> the (unique) message headers in a Maildir-like format, containing links to
> (single-instance stored) message bodies in a a separate location.
Probably better, but to make this transparent for the users, it would
need quite a bit of work in dovecot.
| Helft Spam ausrotten! HTML in Mail ist unhöflich. |
| Postmaster, JAPH, manchmal Wahrsager am RZ der RUB |
| Wahre Worte sind nicht gefällig, gefällige Worte sind nicht wahr.|
| Lao Tse, Tao Te King 81 |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2071 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20080603/3bf0262a/attachment.bin
More information about the dovecot