[Dovecot] Dovecot v1.2 assert() in ACL

[Timo Sirainen]

On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:29 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Shouldn't "SETACL mailbox id" (no rights string) behave differently  
> > than "DELETEACL mailbox id" then as well? Currently it removes the  
> > ACL entry of id.
> >
> > Reading the RFC I get the impression, that SETACL should have three  
> > arguments always.
> 
> I think that's correct and it's probably an implementation kludge to  
> even allow two parameter SETACL.

Looks like there was a generic IMAP parser bug that caused SETACL to not
give an error with two parameters. That's fixed now. Also empty rights
handling is fixed too.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090622/211bf8d0/attachment.bin