[Dovecot] dovecot user
Steffen Kaiser
skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de
Fri Mar 26 17:18:23 EET 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
>>>>>> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
>>>>> That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
>>>>>
>>>>> "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ...
>>>>> just not
>>>>> right at all.
>>>> dovetail
>>> +1
>>
>> Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free
>> of pornographic associations either. :)
>>
>> So my last idea: doveless. "It's less of a dovecot process." To me it
>> seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far.
>
> I don't remember if 'dove-nil', 'dovenil' or 'dovenull' were suggested
> by anyone. If not please consider them.
Hmm, it's going to make fun; there used to be the Monty Python skits using
constructs like:
"
it is spelled
dove-in / dovein
, but it is pronounced
login
"
Or consider yet another meaning of "dove" as past tense of to dive:
dove-in: {one} dove in{to the [dove]cot}
However, I dunno if the preposition "in" fits ... .
Regards,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBS6zQQb+Vh58GPL/cAQKceggAgQ1DoVxgPA5gfbakqdRj3guPaIH5J7E4
wuL6T9zZGMx47uMlfkOyHWHK1UKDK2JNEB3GzSVx6jIpGekmz1zNCzWonr3r6BH5
xm22DLXXlisalnjO8kvaapvraqr4B09aZHunSH8AI3HPIRwCqMEUmHJ2StIUTMgN
ssszq8MLMX9tgbhLlWMV4+NBvUZoouHsC/Ka9lvmSjQjWi2KlUfgtVJFyIsSuhjI
Fd+ccS3mbH1caqcGRH37gluGJ5w/kHVzSojsb1ow+Fww1twx/UHEXSDEvR/ZBIqb
LpQbNF0dTQ1N3aqr0m823R6Luly542e7cpQM6Qz9B2swGj4TOjnFDg==
=Q/Lw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dovecot
mailing list