Am 28.07.2014 um 13:09 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer rs@sys4.de wrote:
Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with director too.
in "very short" words... with nfs ,the director should avoid concurrent events which may happen with lmtp too, depending to multiple server setup
A few of us run large NFS based systems without director, however mostly 99% pop3, not using director on imap has little impact either from our tests, remember, director is only a couple years at most old, people have been doing NFS mailstorage for decades, and with relation to dovecot, ten years or so, the sky never collapsed back then, it hasnt now either thus far :-> using director was considered in risk assessment as its another point of failure, and weighed against its claimed benefit, the decision was made its not justified.
note: we dont use lmtp, each mx mounts/stores directly to EMC storgage with dovecot-lda, 14 front ends = 14 direct storages, sure, means dovecot needs to be installed on each mx (but not listening), but it eliminates the need for dedicated back ends to send to, each mx is that backend.
12 pop3 servers, of note however, we use index:memory on pop3 and smtp's
mail_location = maildir:/mail/%1n/%1.1n/%2.1n/%n/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY
only 3 imaps one of which is webmail, and of course we do not use index:memory on them, these are behind real (serveriron's) load balancers, so if using pretend load balancers :-> YMMV
That looks fine but now whats the problem ? For sure there are many ways to goal. do what you like. I also have no director setup using cluster file systems with loadbalancers working fine.
Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer
-- [*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein