We're using keywords within Thunderbird, and we're syncing those using IMAP. When using more than 5 keywords, we're envcountering problems - they're only partially being synced (between two clients, but not all clients).
Any idea why this could be happening?
The introduction of tagging in Thunderbird is described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114656
-- [*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
Am 07.10.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
We're using keywords within Thunderbird, and we're syncing those using IMAP. When using more than 5 keywords, we're envcountering problems - they're only partially being synced (between two clients, but not all clients).
Any idea why this could be happening?
The introduction of tagging in Thunderbird is described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114656
guess you mean this
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Tags
IMAP
Thunderbird tries to store tags on the server using IMAP keywords. If the IMAP server doesn't support that it will store lags locally in the .msf file for the folder. That means that another PC can not see the labels.
A quick and dirty way to test where tags are stored would be to exit Thunderbird and delete the .msf file, and see if the tags disappeared. A more sophisticated way is to log into the IMAP account and to check whether the PERMANENTFLAGS server response to the SELECT command contains \* (see RFC 3501).This page explains how to manually connect to an IMAP server.
Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer
-- [*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 07.10.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
We're using keywords within Thunderbird, and we're syncing those using IMAP. When using more than 5 keywords, we're envcountering problems - they're only partially being synced (between two clients, but not all clients).
Any idea why this could be happening?
The introduction of tagging in Thunderbird is described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114656
guess you mean this
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Tags
IMAP
Thunderbird tries to store tags on the server using IMAP keywords. If the IMAP server doesn't support that it will store lags locally in the .msf file for the folder. That means that another PC can not see the labels.
There is another paragraphe to notice:
"For sharing tags with another PC (or Thunderbird using a different profile) you need to have defined the same tags to see them. Thunderbird appears to have hard coded support for five tags that mimic the old labels."
Did you tested, if all Thunderbirds store the equally named tag with the same IMAP keyword?
Steffen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEVAwUBVDRIV3D1/YhP6VMHAQK/nAf/bgki9hWoDWA+JtoVP4C90lNnsF1AB/q+ +bMi85mkSesLAzJWLEefwAohaDop8X9n1x3Sbo2DgVSMq1zdk8H7KOp6vmCFtRLw 7efdDYc4LlpuNokMGXvbTDctBDfsLaOFj+Eg0OLsutvDtQGFjxmH24vpH7UkbDqc cDnvtmzLksJSbFyE7Ijal5kro7DX9VRmor9/nUAcMHir5VtfoG23OfXEEVQvfluI wZ4GnoykzO++Hr5CTCbdxRYHbMNPL/hejstfMRe+35xokXX/syxSPQ/jz1VLqFkE t1f7tL0IFysqtbhiYaly02Glgc7hsCwjZQtFtd9b8ytJWXWEjtkRvQ== =WzUI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Am 2014-10-07 um 22:08 schrieb Steffen:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 07.10.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
We're using keywords within Thunderbird, and we're syncing those using IMAP. When using more than 5 keywords, we're envcountering problems - they're only partially being synced (between two clients, but not all clients).
guess you mean this http://kb.mozillazine.org/Tags
IMAP Thunderbird tries to store tags on the server using IMAP keywords. If the IMAP server doesn't support that it will store lags locally in the .msf file for the folder. That means that another PC can not see the labels.
There is another paragraphe to notice: "For sharing tags with another PC (or Thunderbird using a different profile) you need to have defined the same tags to see them. Thunderbird appears to have hard coded support for five tags that mimic the old labels."
Steffen is spot on: only the computer, where you create a tag, will display the new tag. If a tag with the same number but another label exists there, it will show a different label.
The tag is stored on the server, but it will not sync labels to other clients!
Besides, dovecot is probably limited to 26 tags (letters of the alphabet).
PS: I really liked to see a feature to limitlessly tag messages with arbitrary text strings from a synced, easily extensible vocubulary :) But storing them as headers might go against the idea of IMAP, to keep message pristine, storing them extra makes much buro-cracy, oh my!
-- peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Besides, dovecot is probably limited to 26 tags (letters of the alphabet).
Partially, other ones are storred in index files, which are lost, if you need to remove them because of an mailbox corruption.
PS: I really liked to see a feature to limitlessly tag messages with arbitrary text strings from a synced, easily extensible vocubulary :) But storing them as headers might go against the idea of IMAP, to keep message pristine, storing them extra makes much buro-cracy, oh my!
See, IMAP ANNOTATE rfc5257:
"this can be used to attach comments and other useful information to a message. It is also possible to attach annotations to specific parts of a message, so that, for example, they could be marked as seen, or important, or a comment added. "
this seems to be the last post about it: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/140526.html
There probably is a working metadata plugin for Dovecot:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/72702 http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-metadata-plugin
this plugin seems to support annotatemore: http://vman.de/cyrus/draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-07.html
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBVDTpf3z1H7kL/d9rAQL1RAf+MTv0Tr0caHf0HaLDdRYY4sb45ihs/W4j HM+1/n76hs1aDEr2FyCPjPcgfoQF9q3UGhxNakB5O+XKuZiLbLdZbPBwLfZYg7ly fB+tjitASLIpJjN9F6wdalEgEdsd+HsgLiK1fOFJME2qgSXjfwDy7uKKMh/ZIE/x iWOAGANbYC89f60ELXkG9jGCwAAHD3+y7D8Muk0au6tpvnG9Mp6cYG98fWXtBZ41 n3K5D5xGrI3EH5Erg+Ca2tQ9KPUuN7COJl49a+bccD+PVkmdXGGKu2TwQnckUCum slvMeL+bCDQMYH2yfB4chMCj1TVgz/nfpksk3JPEcqfZ28XbTP+WpQ== =Ha/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 08 Oct 2014, at 10:36, Steffen Kaiser skdovecot@smail.inf.fh-brs.de wrote:
PS: I really liked to see a feature to limitlessly tag messages with arbitrary text strings from a synced, easily extensible vocubulary :) But storing them as headers might go against the idea of IMAP, to keep message pristine, storing them extra makes much buro-cracy, oh my!
See, IMAP ANNOTATE rfc5257:
"this can be used to attach comments and other useful information to a message. It is also possible to attach annotations to specific parts of a message, so that, for example, they could be marked as seen, or important, or a comment added. "
this seems to be the last post about it: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/140526.html
There probably is a working metadata plugin for Dovecot:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/72702 http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-metadata-plugin
Newer v2.2.x supports METADATA internally, no need for external plugins. It also supports dsync, ACLs and IMAP commands as mentioned in the first mail. What is still missing is some kind of a quota support, but if you're not too worried about that you can already enable it.
Anyway, RFC 5257 is ANNOTATE which is different from METADATA. That is still not implemented by any plugin and its core functionality is also still missing from Dovecot's lib-storage. If you really want to implement it in a quick and dirty way you could use the mailbox METADATA entries to do it by using the IMAP UIDs as part of the mailbox METADATA entry names. Those don't get automatically deleted when mails are expunged, and could have some other problems, but basically it would work..
participants (6)
-
Peter Chiochetti
-
Ralf Hildebrandt
-
Robert Schetterer
-
Steffen
-
Steffen Kaiser
-
Timo Sirainen