[Dovecot] RFC: PAM service name change?

[Timo Sirainen]

On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 19:40, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service
> name not be imap.  Especially as the same service name is used for pop
> as well :)   

I could change it to use imap for imap and pop3 for pop3.

> My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead.  Any other opinions?

Well, I'm not really against that either.