[Dovecot] RFC: PAM service name change?

[Jeremy Katz]

On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 12:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 19:40, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service
> > name not be imap.  Especially as the same service name is used for pop
> > as well :)   
> 
> I could change it to use imap for imap and pop3 for pop3.
> 
> > My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead.  Any other opinions?
> 
> Well, I'm not really against that either.

The primary advantage of this being that then there are no worries about
pesky file conflicts between dovecot and uw-imap.  Plus it makes it more
obvious exactly which imap the pam config is for.

Cheers,

Jeremy

PS dovecot lands in rawhide tomorrow