[Dovecot] Re: dovecot vs cyrus, uw, etc.
Tom Allison
tallison at tacocat.net
Sun Nov 9 01:00:17 EET 2003
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Tom Allison <tallison at tacocat.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
>>With regard to procmail/spamassassin support I have the following
>>recommendation, and it can be applied to both cyrus and dovecot (I think).
>
>
>>You do not mention what SMTP system you are using, I will assume you are
>>sticking with sendmail and changing qpopper to some IMAP server.
>>However, I would suggest you consider postfix in place of sendmail. And
>>yes, it's very ready for mission critical.
>
>
>>There is a package called amavisd-new which allows you to set up an
>>anti-virus scanner and spamassassin as an extension of postfix. This
>>can process email before it's delivered from postfix to where ever
>>(procmail/lmtp/...)
>
> [...]
>
> I am an exim-guy. ;-) But afaik this all is possible with sendmail, too,
> amavisd-new connects to sendmail's milter interface. /This/ is no reason
> to switch MTAs.
> cu andreas
>
True, amavis will work with sendmail or postfix equally well.
I find people familiar with sendmail stick with it.
Those who are newer to email find postfix a little easier or more
secure* or something that makes it more compelling.
* As I understand it, sendmail can be very insecure to someone who isn't
paying attention to details.
More information about the dovecot
mailing list