[Dovecot] Per-user Reply-To headers

[Timo Sirainen]

On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:13 AM, Timothy White wrote:

> Honestly, I don't know if it's needed. Maybe for the few clients that
> don't have a "Reply-To-List" AND no "Reply-To-All" (Just need to
> delete a few addresses then), it would be useful, but I'm fine to hit
> Reply-To-All and remove addresses. I used to be one of those people
> who complained about no "Reply-To" header, but having read both sides
> of the argument, I figured the easiest way to solve it for the domains
> I manage, was to provide them with 'Reply-to-List' buttons ;-)

But the point here is that Reply-to-List isn't what everyone wants.  
For example I (unfortunately) often reply to some peoples mails weeks  
after they originally asked it. If I just replied to list without  
sending a private reply also, I think it's unlikely that many of the  
replies would ever get read.

So, with this option you can explicitly tell me that you will read  
all the mails in this list and you don't also want private replies.  
Like now I'm sending this privately to you also, if you don't want it  
enable the option :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060704/fef4334e/attachment.pgp