[Dovecot] PLONK THE TROLL... WAS: Re: Best small server config

[Timo Sirainen]

On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:57 +0100, - wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Charles Marcus <CMarcus at media-brokers.com> wrote:
> > This 'Ben' guys was a toll, nothing more - don't waste any more
> > bandwidth on him...
> 
> I'm highly disappointed in dovecot, since it seems 'support' is more
> of a phantom than an option with you people. I have not counted ONE
> decent reply, not ONE comment on using dovecot on a small server with
> the amount of users I mentioned. 

So what do you call this?
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-January/018984.html

It directly answers to your question: There aren't really any such
options, because the best way for a small server to work is pretty much
the same as a large server: minimize the resource usage.

I find it kind of weird that you seem to hate everyone involved with
Dovecot, yet you're still using it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070129/8792d410/attachment-0001.pgp