[Dovecot] Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration

[Timo Sirainen]

On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Andy Dills wrote:

>> I don't think locking is an issue. NFS caching is more problematic.  
>> But with
>> v1.1's mail_nfs_*=yes settings there should be no problems with  
>> storing
>> indexes on NFS.
>
> That's good to know. Do you view 1.1 as production ready now, or  
> should I
> wait for an official release? It sounds production ready in the RC1
> release notes, but I was curious how much remains on your "few issues
> you'd like to fix" list and how relevant they are to my environment.

v1.1 is already used in production in a couple of large installations,  
so it should probably work quite well. I think most of the crashfixes  
that are on my TODO list happen only after client has already  
disconnected.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20080228/c11df658/attachment.bin