[Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
steeeeeveee at gmx.net
Thu Feb 18 22:15:16 EET 2010
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:51:33 -0600
> Von: Eric Rostetter <rostetter at mail.utexas.edu>
> An: dovecot at dovecot.org
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
> Quoting Steve <steeeeeveee at gmx.net>:
> >> > My interest is more in bootstrapping a more highly available system
> >> > from lower quality (commodity) components than very high end use
> >> GFS+DRBD should fit the bill... You need several nics and cables,
> >> but they are dirt cheap... Just 2 machines with the same disk setup,
> >> and a handful of nics and cables, and you are off and running...
> > Can you easy scale that GFS2+DRBD to have more then just 2 nodes? Is
> Not really, no. You can have those two nodes distribute it out via
> gnbd though... Red Hat claims it scales well, but I've not yet tested
I have already installed GFS on a cluster in the past, but never on DRBD.
> > Can all the
> > nodes at the same time be active or is one node always the master
> > and the other a hot spare that kicks in when the master is down?
> The free version of DRBD only supports max 2 nodes. They can be
> or active-passive.
> The non-free version is supposed to support 3 nodes, but I've heard
> reports on what the 3rd node can do... You'd have to investigate that
> yourself... I'm not interested in it, since I don't want to pay for it...
> (Though I am willing to donate to the project)
Hmm... when I started with GlusterFS I thought that using more then two nodes is something that I will never need. But now that I have GlusterFS up and running and I am using more then two nodes I really see a benefit in being able to use more then two nodes. For me this is a big advantage of GlusterFS compared to DRBD.
> My proposed solution to the more-than-two-nodes is gnbd...
Never heard of it before. Don't like the fact that I need to patch the Kernel in order to get it working.
> If that doesn't meet your needs, then DRBD probably isn't the proper
> You didn't mention anything about number of nodes in your original post,
I did not post the original post. I just responded to the original post saying that GlusterFS works for me.
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Ed W
> Eric Rostetter
> The Department of Physics
> The University of Texas at Austin
> Go Longhorns!
NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen!
More information about the dovecot