[Dovecot] question about fts_squat

Timo Sirainen tss at iki.fi
Mon Jun 18 20:30:21 EEST 2012

On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:

>> Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat.
> Better in what respect?
> less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)

Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.

More information about the dovecot mailing list