[Dovecot] question about fts_squat

[Wojciech Puchar]

thank you very much for help!

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:

> On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat.
>> Better in what respect?
>>
>> less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)
>
> Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.
>
>
>