[Dovecot] question about fts_squat
wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Mon Jun 18 21:06:02 EEST 2012
thank you very much for help!
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat.
>> Better in what respect?
>> less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)
> Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.
More information about the dovecot