[Dovecot] clucene build warnings?

[Timo Sirainen]

On 17.9.2012, at 15.42, Charles Marcus wrote:

> On 2012-09-17 8:21 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>> CLucene seems to be a pretty dead project.
> 
> Bummer...
> 
> Was my memory correct that lucene is what you currently recommend for FTS for dovecot?

Lucene or Solr (i.e. anything but Squat).

>>  They've talked something about merging with Lucene++, but that hasn't happened. I've been wondering about moving to Lucene++.
> 
> Yuck - looks like it is java based?
> 
> http://lucene.apache.org/

Both CLucene and Lucene++ are C++ ports of the original Java Lucene.