[Dovecot] RFE: please add Return-Path: to sieve sent mail headers

[Charles Marcus]

On 5/14/2014 10:44 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote:
> Yep, those using different <> null senders should be aware, that there 
> envelope sender rewritings, such as BATV and SRS0, that make the 
> address unique each time by adding hashed timestamps or something like 
> that. Those rewritings undermine the vacation database.
> I hope that those implementations generate an unique address per day 
> and not per message.

Best would be if there was a way to code sieve such that it could ignore 
the BATV/SRS0 junk, as well as plussed addresses...

Is there enough rhyme/reason to these schemes that would make that feasible?

-- 

Best regards,

Charles