2.2.25 dumps core with "Panic: file imap-client.c: line 837 (client_check_command_hangs): assertion failed: (client->io != NULL)"

[Jake Goerzen]

Hi Andreas & Timo,


   I've found out what is causing the incorrect hash in the built 
packages.  Our build system use here at OpenCSW has internal git 
patching capability.  I disabled it and rebuild again.  This time all 
architectures and memory model's are reporting the correct git-commit 
hash 7be1766.  Thank you Andreas for noticing and reporting this.


regards,

Jake


On 08/31/2016 06:17 AM, Piper Andreas wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> from the maintainer of the OpenCSW package I got the below answer.
>
> As the newly build package yields another different commit hash (which I
> cannot find on GitHub too), I would ask, if you are sure that the commit
> hash-output in 'doveconf -n' is generated correctly?
>
> The headline of 'doveconf -n' with the newly build package is
> # 2.2.25 (68082dc): /etc/opt/csw/dovecot/dovecot.conf
>
> Many thanks for your help,
> Andreas
>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: OpenCSW question about package CSWdovecot
> Datum: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:44 -0700
> Von: jgoerzen <jgoerzen at opencsw.org>
> An: piper at hrz.uni-marburg.de
>
> Hello Andreas,
>
>
>     The OpenCSW dovecot package was built using the 2.2.25 version
> release tarball.  No code changes or patches have been applied. I'm not
> sure what happened.  I will respin new packages and then check to see if
> the git-commit hash is correct.  When the packages are done building
> I'll put them in the experimental catalog:
>
>
> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#jgoerzen
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jake
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 08/29/2016 11:59 PM, piper at hrz.uni-marburg.de wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> with your newest dovecot-package 2.2.25,REV=2016.07.01, I sometimes get core-dumps as documented in my bug-report at the dovecot-mailing-list: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-August/105321.html
>> In reaction to my bug-report, Timo Sirainen asks, which git-commit of the dovecot-sources was used for this package: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-August/105332.html
>>
>> Could you shed some light on this?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Andreas
>