Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32

María Arrea maria.arrea at gmx.com
Mon Oct 16 13:30:12 EEST 2017


El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribió:
> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value.
>
> Aki
So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right 
mail_location settings?

mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n




>
>
> On 16.10.2017 13:22, María Arrea wrote:
>>      I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this
>> the expected?
>>
>>      Regards
>>
>>      María
>>
>> El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, María Arrea escribió:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>>      I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my
>>> filesystem layout
>>>
>>>      /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives
>>>      /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks
>>>      /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks
>>>
>>>      This is my mail_location:
>>>
>>> mail_location =
>>> mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      What should I write in mail_location with the new ITERINDEX setting?
>>>
>>>      Regards
>>>
>>>      María




More information about the dovecot mailing list