Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32

[Aki Tuomi]

On 16.10.2017 13:30, María Arrea wrote:
> El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribió:
>> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value.
>>
>> Aki
> So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right
> mail_location settings?
>
> mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n
>
>
>

Precisely correct value is just INTERINDEX. No yes or no.

Aki

>
>
>>
>>
>> On 16.10.2017 13:22, María Arrea wrote:
>>>      I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this
>>> the expected?
>>>
>>>      Regards
>>>
>>>      María
>>>
>>> El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, María Arrea escribió:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>>      I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my
>>>> filesystem layout
>>>>
>>>>      /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives
>>>>      /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks
>>>>      /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks
>>>>
>>>>      This is my mail_location:
>>>>
>>>> mail_location =
>>>> mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      What should I write in mail_location with the new ITERINDEX
>>>> setting?
>>>>
>>>>      Regards
>>>>
>>>>      María