[Dovecot] Enable outlook-idle workaround.

[Johannes Berg]

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 11:27 +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
> Why is this an option? Is there a reason why someone would want to
> disable this workaround?

Like Timo said:
> but I thought I'd require 
> all workarounds to be explicitly enabled so future client implementors 
> can make sure their clients work without any of them.

johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041011/400503dd/attachment-0001.bin>