[Dovecot] Enable outlook-idle workaround.

[Andreas Aardal Hanssen]

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Johannes Berg wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 11:27 +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
>> Why is this an option? Is there a reason why someone would want to
>> disable this workaround?
>Like Timo said:
>> but I thought I'd require
>> all workarounds to be explicitly enabled so future client implementors
>> can make sure their clients work without any of them.

System adminstrators have no reason to switch off a workaround in Dovecot
because a bug was fixed in a certain revision of an IMAP client, and
Microsoft doesn't need Dovecot to fix this bug.

Don't mean to sound pragmatic, but why make it an option?

--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen
http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg2