[Dovecot] Enable outlook-idle workaround.

Andreas Aardal Hanssen andreas at hanssen.name
Mon Oct 11 12:54:45 EEST 2004

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Johannes Berg wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 11:27 +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
>> Why is this an option? Is there a reason why someone would want to
>> disable this workaround?
>Like Timo said:
>> but I thought I'd require
>> all workarounds to be explicitly enabled so future client implementors
>> can make sure their clients work without any of them.

System adminstrators have no reason to switch off a workaround in Dovecot
because a bug was fixed in a certain revision of an IMAP client, and
Microsoft doesn't need Dovecot to fix this bug.

Don't mean to sound pragmatic, but why make it an option?

Andreas Aardal Hanssen

More information about the dovecot mailing list