[Dovecot] 1.0rc8: another problem? Possibly 64-bit index?

Jonathan dovecot at redigloo.org
Fri Oct 13 12:53:10 UTC 2006


Jens Laas wrote:

> Or you can separate the indexes with a little loss of storage space.
> I guess it could even be directly supported by dovecot.
> Ex .imap32, .imap64

It shouldn't be hard to make the indexes machine independent (e.g.
32/64 bit and even little-endian/big-endian - see htonl(3)).

I haven't looked at the code.  Perhaps that's what it intends to do.

Jonathan.


More information about the dovecot mailing list