Probably K9 not Outlook - Re: Outlook 2010 not connecting to secure POP3
Robert Moskowitz
rgm at htt-consult.com
Sun Nov 23 23:27:27 UTC 2014
On 11/23/2014 05:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 23.11.2014 um 23:30 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> On 11/23/2014 04:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Am 23.11.2014 um 22:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>> no idea what you are talking about
>>>>
>>>> K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
>>>>
>>>> no idea what has "https" to do with email nor why someone needs to
>>>> "disable K9 long enugh" whatever "long enough" is - don't get me wrong
>>>> but most technical context on several lists of you if it comes to
>>>> details is cluttered and your permanently "i am working on IETF" even
>>>> makes things worser
>>> Yeah, such descriptions are leading to confusion, speculation
>>> k9 got mail downloaded before outlook could....no idea why sombody
>>> should use k9 with pop3
>>
>> And I did not know there was a K9 android app. K9 like in guard dogs.
>
> that's why you should be precise in what you are posting - in context
> of mail K9 is for pretty anybody
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fsck.k9
Got it for next time.
>
>> The default settings only allow https stuff on port 443. Must be some
>> attempt to get around controls to use TLS on any other port.
>
> uhm "telnet server port" is still the way to go *before* start other
> debuggings, if that don't work no need to try a high level client
> until that problem is solved
Well, since this was a secure connection test, needed openssl for the
connect, not telnet. And how to do that on Windows? I DID try it on
this F20 notebook, and of course it worked just fine. That was why I
really suspected Windows TLS functions. Then when I was trying again, I
caught a little pop up in the system tray saying how the nanny software
was blocking the bad program that was trying to do https to port 995...
I really should be so harsh about the nanny software. It DOES protect a
lot of families from content they do not want to see. Just that the
defaults no longer match where we want internet privacy to go.
More information about the dovecot
mailing list