November 2003 - dovecot

[Dovecot] -test8 & Mail.app
by Dan Sully 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

A user just tried to use OSX 10.3's Mail.app via imap. It caused the process to start eating CPU, and this in the logs. Any idea what could be happening here? What information should I get on his setup? imap-login: Nov 03 14:28:37 Info: Login: fenner [12.106.35.5] imap(fenner): Nov 03 14:30:37 Error: Timeout while waiting for release of exclusive fcntl() lock for index file /home/f/fenner/M>aildir/.INBOX/.imap.index imap(fenner): Nov 03 14:32:37 Error: Timeout while waiting for release of exclusive fcntl() lock for index file /home/f/fenner/M>aildir/.INBOX/.imap.index imap(fenner): Nov 03 14:32:37 Panic: file index-messageset.c: line 346 (index_messageset_next): assertion failed: (!(ctx->expung>es->uid1 <= mail->rec->uid && ctx->expunges->uid2 >= mail->rec->uid)) dovecot: Nov 03 14:32:37 Error: child 26371 (imap) killed with signal 6 Thanks. -D -- Ooo-Eee-Ooo-Ah-Ah-Ting-Tang-Walla-Walla-Bing-Bang

1 0

[Dovecot] dies on start-up: Auth process
by Tom Allison 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

I was digging through some of the archives and ran into someone who was having the same problem, but for completely different reasons....i think. dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:51 Info: Dovecot starting up dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: Auth process died too early - shutting down dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27673 (login) killed with signal 11 dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27672 (login) killed with signal 11 dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27671 (login) killed with signal 11 dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27670 (auth) killed with signal 11 So I took the advice posted and ran 'strace dovecot' and this is what I got. Unfortunately I'm not exactly good enough with this to even know what I'm looking at. But I suspect the notation about "/dev/null" might have something to do with it. my user, dovecot as a shell of /bin/bash and a $HOME of /usr/local/lib/dovecot By all rights, he's almost a regular user, except that his UID is <100 (I built user:dovecot as a system uid under SuSE 8.2) open("/var/run/dovecot/", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 close(3) = 0 lstat64("/var/run/dovecot/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 open(".", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 open("/var/run/dovecot//login", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_NOFOLLOW) = 4 fchdir(4) = 0 open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY) = -1 ENOTDIR (Not a directory) open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 6 fstat64(6, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 fcntl64(6, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 brk(0) = 0x8061000 brk(0x8062000) = 0x8062000 getdents64(6, /* 2 entries */, 4096) = 48 getdents64(6, /* 0 entries */, 4096) = 0 close(4) = 0 close(6) = 0 fchdir(3) = 0 close(3) = 0 geteuid32() = 0 lstat64("/var/run/dovecot//login", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 open("/var/run/dovecot//login", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 close(3) = 0 lstat64("/var/run/dovecot//login", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 access("/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth", X_OK) = 0 open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 fcntl64(3, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 dup(3) = 4 fcntl64(4, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(4, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 6 setsockopt(6, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 setsockopt(6, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [1], 4) = 0 bind(6, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(143), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0 getsockname(6, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(143), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, [16]) = 0 listen(6, 8) = 0 fcntl64(6, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 fcntl64(6, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(6, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 dup(4) = 7 fcntl64(7, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(7, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 dup(4) = 8 fcntl64(8, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(8, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 dup(4) = 9 fcntl64(9, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(9, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 dup2(4, 0) = 0 dup2(4, 1) = 1 dup2(4, 2) = 2 fork() = 27706 exit_group(0) = ?

4 10

Re: [Dovecot] Re: Bug with partial IMAP fetches
by Matthew Reimer 03 Nov '03

03 Nov '03

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:43:55PM -0600, Matthew Reimer wrote: > >>A little more information: >> >>This bug results in Mozilla and pine never rendering the message, since >>dovecot lies about how much data was really sent, as seen in the >>following log in which only 394 bytes (rather than the 10240 dovecot is >>claiming to send) are returned: > > > Does this patch fix it? http://dovecot.fi/fetch-body.patch No; I'm already using all available 0.99.10 patches. Sorry for not mentioning that before. Matt

1 0

[Dovecot] Re: Bug with partial IMAP fetches
by Matthew Reimer 03 Nov '03

03 Nov '03

A little more information: This bug results in Mozilla and pine never rendering the message, since dovecot lies about how much data was really sent, as seen in the following log in which only 394 bytes (rather than the 10240 dovecot is claiming to send) are returned: ---- 8 UID fetch 94 (UID RFC822.SIZE BODY[]<10240.10240>) * 24 FETCH (UID 94 RFC822.SIZE 20873 BODY[]<10240> {10240} G SRC="/world/image/nav/contents_bottom.gif" WIDTH="49" HEIGHT="15" BORDER="0" VSPACE="10"></A></TD></TR></TABLE>  <script type="text/javascript"> if(parent.frames.length>0&&!isContents) top.location.replace(document.location) </script> </BODY> </HTML>  --------------010405000308030207040500-- ) 8 OK Fetch completed. ---- Matt

2 1

[Dovecot] Debian bug #201444: More verbose logging
by Jaldhar H. Vyas 03 Nov '03

03 Nov '03

I brought this up a while ago but the submitter is wondering if there has been any progress on this issue. He says: It would be extremely nice to have a little bit more detailed logging, and I believe it doesn't really require that much code. I use now a daemon which logs login (name, ip; as dovecot does), and logout (with name, logout reason if any special) with the numbers of "read new mail number and size" and "mail left on server number and size". Would be nice to have something like that in dovecot. Could something like this be added for the next version? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar(a)debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/

3 4

[Dovecot] Problems finding information on passwd-file
by David A. Desrosiers 03 Nov '03

03 Nov '03

I've recently converted over to dovecot to uw-imap, and am having a heck of a time trying to find actual docs that describe how to set up virtual users properly without using ldap or posgres.. Basically I need to know what goes in auth_userdb and auth_passdb for a system with *NO* local user accounts in /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. I will only create mbox files for these users in /var/mail/%u and alternately a home directory where they can store their own mail folders under /home/%u. How can I do this, given the current dovecot codebase? I've googled for a few hours, talked to many people on irc, and checked the mailing lists (of what I could find) related to this, and found nothing whatsoever describing how to achive this. Dovecot apparently supports "virtual users", but I can't find any supporting documentation that describes exactly HOW to set that up. Thanks in advance. d.

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] evolution - folders not displayed correctly
by Terry 03 Nov '03

03 Nov '03

--- Jonas Smedegaard <dr(a)jones.dk> wrote: > s�n, 2003-11-02 kl. 22:54 skrev Terry: > ... > > I tried my account in evolution and all the > folders > > appear in one level and not in several as they > were in > > thunderbird. > ... > > What could be the problem? Thanks! > > The documentation of offlineimap seems to reveil the > cause of the > problem: Evolution uses "/" as delimiter, not "." as > dovecot. > > It seems to not be configurable in Evolution, so > access the files > through dovecot instead of directly. > > - Jonas I am accessing my files via dovecot. That is why I am mailing the dovecot list. Maybe I misunderstood your response. I will check around to see that deliter...probably in the xml configs somewhere.... ===== Terry __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

2 1