December 2010 - dovecot

[Dovecot] adding servers to director_mail_servers
by Cor Bosman 16 Dec '10

16 Dec '10

Is there a specific order in which one has to add servers to director_mail_servers, Let's say I have 20 loadbalanced director servers (I dont, but for arguments sake). I want to add 5 servers to director_mail_servers. If I do this by restarting each director server 1 by 1 with an updated conf, it seems the 5 new servers dont get added. Or at least I dont get what makes it work eventually. Only after restarting a few times they seem to all want to agree on the new list of servers. Cor

2 2

[Dovecot] users's mailboxes = mbox , shared mailboxes = maildir ... is it possible ?
by Frank Bonnet 16 Dec '10

16 Dec '10

Hello I solved my previous SSL problem by reinstalling dovecot2 ... :-) at FreeBSD 8.1 Now I'm using dovecot 2 , cool ... Actually my production mail server runs with MBOX format but reading the dovecot 2 wiki I read shared mailboxes are only working well with Maildir format. As I would like to setup some shared mailboxes, is it possible to have MBOX format for normal users ( UNIX NIS users ) and Maildir format for shared mailboxes to gain access to the per-user \Seen flag Or do I have to convert ALL my server to Maildir format ? Thanks a lot for your help

3 2

[Dovecot] Plugins on a NFS
by Alex Baule 16 Dec '10

16 Dec '10

Hi timo..... I Made a plugin that's works fine in a Normal Partition and a GlusterFS enviroment too. in NFS it's intermitent, some times works, some times don't. Only the expunge part have this issue, i use stat to get the amont of hard link in a file. There is because of that (stat, hard link count) ? If is, there is some workarround to do !? Tks Timo !!!

2 3

[Dovecot] xapian search plugin
by Vasiliy G Tolstov 16 Dec '10

16 Dec '10

Hello. Does anybody write fts xapian plugin to dovecot 2? If nobody - can You suggest me what i need to read and what source files i need no read to write own xapian fts plugin. Thank You for any comments. -- Vasiliy G Tolstov <v.tolstov(a)selfip.ru> Selfip.Ru

2 2

[Dovecot] ssl enabled, but ssl_cert not set ( 2.0.7 freebsd 8.1 )
by Frank Bonnet 16 Dec '10

16 Dec '10

hello trying to install dovecot 2 on a fresh installed machine I get this error message : doveconf -n > dovecot-new.conf doveconf: Error: ssl enabled, but ssl_cert not set doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: ssl enabled, but ssl_cert not set the ssl config file look like the following : Thanks for any info. ## ## SSL settings ## # SSL/TLS support: yes, no, required. <doc/wiki/SSL.txt> ssl = yes # PEM encoded X.509 SSL/TLS certificate and private key. They're opened before # dropping root privileges, so keep the key file unreadable by anyone but # root. Included doc/mkcert.sh can be used to easily generate self-signed # certificate, just make sure to update the domains in dovecot-openssl.cnf ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem # If key file is password protected, give the password here. Alternatively # give it when starting dovecot with -p parameter. Since this file is often # world-readable, you may want to place this setting instead to a different # root owned 0600 file by using ssl_key_password = <path. #ssl_key_password = # PEM encoded trusted certificate authority. Set this only if you intend to use # ssl_verify_client_cert=yes. The file should contain the CA certificate(s) # followed by the matching CRL(s). (e.g. ssl_ca = </etc/ssl/certs/ca.pem) #ssl_ca = # Request client to send a certificate. If you also want to require it, set # auth_ssl_require_client_cert=yes in auth section. #ssl_verify_client_cert = no # Which field from certificate to use for username. commonName and # x500UniqueIdentifier are the usual choices. You'll also need to set # auth_ssl_username_from_cert=yes. #ssl_cert_username_field = commonName # How often to regenerate the SSL parameters file. Generation is quite CPU # intensive operation. The value is in hours, 0 disables regeneration # entirely. #ssl_parameters_regenerate = 168 # SSL ciphers to use #ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL -- Frank BONNET 01.45.92.66.17 Service des Moyens Informatique Generaux ESIEE PARIS Cité Descartes / BP 99 93162 NOISY-LE-GRAND Cedex http://www.esiee.fr <http://www.esiee.fr/>

5 6

[Dovecot] problem with ~/mail/ namespace
by Tom Lieuallen 16 Dec '10

16 Dec '10

We just changed from UW imap last night and one of our bigger problems right now is that the ~/mail/ compatibility namespace doesn't seem to work. dovecot 2.0.8 Dec 15 12:01:52 zen.engr.oregonstate.edu dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.warning] imap(tom2): Warning: Subscriptions file /nfs/rack/u4/t/tom2/mail/.subscriptions: Ignoring invalid entry: ~/mail/foo1/folder1 Dec 15 12:01:52 zen.engr.oregonstate.edu dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.warning] imap(tom2): Warning: Subscriptions file /nfs/rack/u4/t/tom2/mail/.subscriptions: Ignoring invalid entry: ~tom2/mail/foo1/folder1 from .subscriptions: ~/mail/foo1/folder1 ~tom2/mail/foo1/folder1 in 10-mail.conf namespace { type = private separator = / prefix = inbox = yes } # for backwards compatibility: namespace { type = private separator = / prefix = mail/ hidden = yes list = no } namespace { type = private separator = / prefix = ~/mail/ hidden = yes list = no } namespace { type = private separator = / prefix = ~%u/mail/ hidden = yes list = no } What's funny is that it appears to work with a preauthenticated session or by using openssl to connect to port 993. 1 list "~/mail/" * * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mail/testfolder" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mail/Trash" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mail/Sent" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "~/mail/foo1" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mail/foo1/folder1" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "~/mail/foo2" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mail/foo2/folder1" 1 OK List completed. 1 select ~/mail/foo2/folder1 * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted. * 1 EXISTS * 0 RECENT * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1274985137] UIDs valid * OK [UIDNEXT 2] Predicted next UID * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 1] Highest 1 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. We're seeing this with at least thunderbird and outlook. thank you Tom Lieuallen Oregon State University

3 4

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.8 don´t recognize auth user format
by Wilberth Perez 15 Dec '10

15 Dec '10

My configuration file have this lines: # doveconf | grep user auth_anonymous_username = anonymous auth_master_user_separator = auth_socket_path = auth-userdb auth_ssl_username_from_cert = no auth_username_chars = abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ01234567890.-_@ auth_username_format = %Lu <-----(in version 1.2.10 this work fine) auth_username_translation = default_internal_user = dovecot default_login_user = dovenull director_user_expire = 15 mins login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l mpid=%e %c mail_max_userip_connections = 10 in this new version, my user authentication fails: Debug: shadow(wperez(a)mydomain,1.2.3.4): lookup Info: shadow(wperez(a)mydomain,1.2.3.4): unknown user auth: Debug: client out: FAIL 2 user=wperez@mydomain in my server only exists the user wperez, but dovecot uses the user "wperez@mydomain" in this new version auth format changes? Thank you.

3 2

[Dovecot] Trying to populate dovecot with outlook contacts
by Spyros Tsiolis 15 Dec '10

15 Dec '10

Hello, What the subject says. I am trying, that is. OK, here's the story. Users very lazy. Don't want to write down their contact details from scratch. Here's what I thought : migrate (export?) contacts from outlook to mozilla thunderbird. Then find a way to make thunderbird "talk" to dovecot, so that the latter can import the contact details from mozilla tb. Any ideas ? Will it work ? Am I ranting ? :-) Thank you all, s. ---- "I merely function as a channel that filters music through the chaos of noise" - Vangelis

2 2

[Dovecot] Problem after upgrade dovecot v2.0.8
by Wilberth Perez 15 Dec '10

15 Dec '10

Hello, upgrade Dovecot from v1.2.10 to v2.0.8, after build a new configuration file following instructions of http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0 run dovecot I get this: auth: Error: Fatal: Dovecot version mismatch: Master is v2.0.8, dovecot-auth is v1.2.10 (if you don't care, set version_ignore=yes) log: Error: service(auth): child 3389 returned error 89 (Fatal failure) master: Error: service(auth): command startup failed, throttling Did any SSL configuration is missing? I am currently authenticating with dovecot and postfix. Any knows , how could i solved this problem? Thanks.

3 2

Re: [Dovecot] Question about "slow" storage but fast cpus, plenty of ram and dovecot
by Stan Hoeppner 15 Dec '10

15 Dec '10

Patrick Westenberg put forth on 12/11/2010 5:12 AM: > Stan Hoeppner schrieb: > >> So, either: >> >> 2. Move indexes to memory > > What steps have to be done and what will the configuration look like > to have your indexes in memory? Regarding Dovecot 1.2.x, for maildir, I believe it would be something like this: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY The ":INDEX=MEMORY" disables writing the index files to disk, and as the name implies, I believe, simply keeps indexes in memory. The docs say: "If you really want to, you can also disable the index files completely by appending :INDEX=MEMORY." My read of that is that indexing isn't disabled completely, merely storing the indexes to disk is disables. The indexes are still built and maintained in memory. Timo, is that correct? Also, due to the potential size of the index files (mine alone are 276 MB on an 877 MB mbox), you'll need to do some additional research to see if this is a possibility for you. If using a ramdisk, 100 mail boxen like mine would require ~ 27.6 GB or RAM just for the index files. This would not be logical to do or feasible given the amount of RAM required. I don't know if, or how much, storing them in RAM via :INDEX=MEMORY consumes, as compared to using a ramdisk. The memory consumption may be less or it may be more. Timo should be able to answer this, and give a recommendation as to whether this is even a sane thing to do. -- Stan

7 18