June 2010 - dovecot - dovecot.org

Re: [Dovecot] auth socket goes away on reload
by David Jonas 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

On 6/3/10 , Jun 3, 10:16 AM, William Blunn wrote: > On 03/06/2010 17:35, David Jonas wrote: >> We're using the SQLite backend for authentication of Postfix SASL. When >> the db is replaced we HUP dovecot to close and reopen its connection. >> During this time it appears the socket file is removed and Postfix >> rejects the authentication attempt. From the logs: >> >> Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx dovecot: dovecot: SIGHUP received - reloading >> configuration >> Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14746]: warning: SASL: Connect to >> private/auth failed: Connection refused >> Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14746]: warning: unknown[dd.dd.dd.dd]: >> SASL LOGIN authentication failed: >> Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14746]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >> unknown[dd.dd.dd.dd]: 554 5.7.1<user(a)example.com>: Relay access denied; >> from=<user2(a)example.com> to=<user(a)example.com> proto=ESMTP >> helo=<localhost.localdomain> >> >> Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14930]: warning: unknown[dd.dd.dd.dd]: >> SASL LOGIN authentication failed: Connection lost to authentication >> server >> Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14930]: lost connection after AUTH >> from unknown[dd.dd.dd.dd] >> >> Is there an obvious way around this? I know I could somehow merge the >> changes into the running sqlite db but that undermines the simplicity of >> the design I have. Maybe a patch to reopen the db if it's replaced? Or >> perhaps I should just switch to a different db format -- that's probably >> the quickest/easiest solution. Any other ideas? There are about 20k >> entries to deal with. > > It sounds like your updates arrive in the shape of entire-table updates. > > That is no problem. You can easily apply entire-table updates to the > database without having to re-create the SQLite database file, and > without having to tell Dovecot. > > Just create a new table (with a different name) inside the SQLite > database file, with the new content, then snap it into place using a > pair of table renames inside a transaction; then delete the old table. > > That way you don't need to re-create the database file or HUP Dovecot, > and Dovecot will only ever see the old data or the new data. That sounds reasonable, not sure why I didn't think of it! Thanks.

1 0

[Dovecot] Configure unsuccessful login attempts
by Greg Pearson 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Hi, using PAM, how can I configure how many attempts a user can make to connect, and if exceeding a certain number, block him for a specified amount of time? Any idea what the defaults are?

4 6

[Dovecot] master users with dovecot2 braek down to allowed domain
by Robert Schetterer 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Hi, i think ive asked it before perhaps this feature can be included in dovecot2 couldnt get it run with dovecot 1.2.x if i use the postfixadmin superuser,domainadmin,domainuser layout so there are domainadmins defined in a sql table it would be a nice feature to break it down to be master only at there related domains via sql lookup at recent i think there is only the chance to give master rights to all adresses for users defined as masters -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria

2 2

[Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam
by Phil Howard 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself (e.g. TextCHAs and such). I already asked in another thread about removing message files at the search from a designated "learn-spam" folder. My next question would be how to automatically place detected spam into a specific folder for the user to access or ignore as they deem fit. That would seem to me to be something for the deliver command and its -m option. But this might be more of a Dovecot and MTA coordination issue, too (e.g. how to get the spam detection done in the MTA ... Postfix in my case ... to become a label of some sort that ends deciding the folder. The -m option might be harder to get it dynamically set since it would be hard coded in master.cf for Postfix (so a variable has to be able to direct it to INBOX in this case). But maybe the "standard" way of doing this is to shim another program between the MTA (Postfix for me) and the LDA (Dovecot deliver) to dynamically add the -m option on the fly? Lacking any other clever solution, this seems to me to be the way I could make it work. Maybe there is a special header deliver could detect, such as "X-Spam: yes"? A wiki document on how Dovecot helps (or how to help Dovecot) in the fight against spam, I think, would be helpful.

10 28

[Dovecot] returned error 83 (Out of memory)
by J Contad 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

Hello! I've setup dovecot a few months ago, and it was working pretty swimmingly. Then, out of nowhere, we started getting this error: Apr 21 19:15:17 IMAP(xx(a)xxx.com): Fatal: block_alloc(1073741824): Out of memory Apr 21 19:15:17 IMAP(xx(a)xxx.com): Error: Raw backtrace: imap [0x49e5e0] -> imap [0x49e643] -> imap [0x49dba1] -> imap [0x4a7f6d] -> imap [0x4a7f98] -> imap [0x4a8028] -> imap [0x49bf6f] -> imap(buffer_write+0xe4) [0x49c334] -> imap(mail_cache_lookup_headers+0x146) [0x46dcf6] -> imap [0x458162] -> imap(index_mail_get_first_header+0x45) [0x458685] -> imap [0x45fe44] -> imap [0x460008] -> imap [0x4796d1] -> imap(hash2_lookup+0x64) [0x4a1c94] -> imap(mail_index_strmap_view_sync_add+0x85) [0x47ab05] -> imap(mail_thread_init+0x2a5) [0x4602f5] -> imap(cmd_thread+0x161) [0x41f931] -> imap(cmd_uid+0x78) [0x41fb38] -> imap [0x42079c] -> imap [0x420852] -> imap(client_handle_input+0x3f) [0x42098f] -> imap(client_input+0x5f) [0x4214df] -> imap(io_loop_handler_run+0xf8) [0x4a63a8] -> imap(io_loop_run+0x1d) [0x4a54ed] -> imap(main+0x620) [0x428db0] -> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x3f75e1d8a4] -> imap [0x419969] Apr 21 19:15:17 dovecot: Error: child 25918 (imap) returned error 83 (Out of memory - see mail_process_size setting) The folder (which is shared) has about 8 thousand emails in it. I'm not sure if it's pertinent, but the dovecot.index.cache file is about 8MB. Help? Cheers, -- John

3 2

[Dovecot] Dovecot install problem
by David 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

I am trying to set up a new web and mail server i have postfix now working but dovecot will not allow me to login and retrieve the emails so below isa portion of the log file passwd-file /var/mail/vhosts/xxxx.net/shadow: stat() failed: Permission denied passwd-file(xxxxx@xxxx.net,::ffff:0.0.0.0): no passwd file: /var/mail/vhosts/xxxx.net/shadow Dovecot -n output # 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login mail_location: Maildir:/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n mail_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3 auth default: mechanisms: plain login CRAM-MD5 verbose: yes debug: yes debug_passwords: yes passdb: driver: passwd-file args: /var/mail/vhosts/%d/shadow userdb: driver: passwd-file args: /var/mail/vhosts/%d/passwd socket: type: listen client: path: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth mode: 432 user: postfix group: postfix The passwd shadow file -rw-r----- 1 root root 210 May 24 21:39 passwd -rw-r----- 1 root root 327 May 24 21:39 shadow So who whould own these files? What should the perrmissions be?

4 7

[Dovecot] configuring sendmail to work with dovecot+LDAP
by Douglas Maus 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

I would like to setup dovecot (1.1.20) with LDAP virtual users, but I don't seem to understand how to get my sendmail to accept mail for the virtual users. (I am rather new to this, so I may have some misunderstandings) I have followed - wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotOpenLdap (OpenLDAP 2.3.43) and I think I have IMAP working for virtual users. I can connect to port 143, enter a username and password and it works. Now I surmise I need to configure my SMTP server to accept mail for these LDAP virtual users, and deliver it appropriately. (The above HowTo doesn't address this step, from what I can tell) I read - wiki.dovecot.org/LDA and wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sendmail (I'm using OpenBSD 4.7, which uses sendmail for MTA / SMTP server, sendmail version 8.14.3) For sendmail.cf, I made the changes in my sendmail.mc file to include the dovecot mailer (calling /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver), and compiled with m4 and installed the new sendmail.cf For dovecot.conf, I edited the portions (abbreviated): protocol lda { auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master } and auth default { socket listen { master {path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master }}} When I try to test this, (telnet www.example.org 25) If I try: MAIL TO:jdoe@www.example.org I get "User unknown" I see that if I try: MAIL TO:jdoe@example.org I get "Relaying denied" Either way it doesn't get delivered. Thank you for any help. And if anyone knows a good basic tutorial for dovecot+LDAP+sendmail I would really appreciate it. dovecot -n (de-identified, and yes I know SSL is disabled, after it all works I'll fix it) ---------- # 1.1.20: /etc/dovecot.conf Warning: fd limit 128 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 640). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings # OS: OpenBSD 4.7 i386 ffs base_dir: /var/dovecot/ protocols: imap listen: *:143 ssl_disable: yes ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/dovecotcert.pem disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_user: _dovecot verbose_proctitle: yes first_valid_uid: 519 last_valid_uid: 519 first_valid_gid: 519 last_valid_gid: 519 mail_uid: 519 mail_gid: 519 mail_location: mbox:/var/mail/virtual/%u/mail mbox_write_locks: fcntl imap_client_workarounds: delay-newmail netscape-eoh tb-extra-mailbox-sep lda: postmaster_address: postmaster(a)example.org sendmail_path: /usr/sbin/sendmail auth_socket_path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master auth default: verbose: yes passdb: driver: bsdauth passdb: driver: ldap args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf userdb: driver: passwd userdb: driver: ldap args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf socket: type: listen master: path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mode: 384 user: _dovevirt

2 1

[Dovecot] Migration - Dovecot to Dovecot
by Greg Pearson 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

Hi, I am using Dovecot with mbox format, and I am interested to move to Maildir. I have run the modified script (mb2md) but it seems UIDs are not preserved. I don't know how to verify this, but my client seems to be downloading all messages again. Can someone help?

3 2

[Dovecot] recipient_delimiter
by Phil Howard 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

I have recipient_delimiter = + in main.cf (Postfix). But deliveries to dovecot/deliver are still being rejected. It appears that the full email is still in the envelope (e.g. phil+howard(a)example.com which I want to be delivered to phil(a)example.com) Is that how it's supposed to work and Dovecot just doesn't support this?

4 29

Re: [Dovecot] draft-ietf-morg-list-specialuse-01 - IMAP LIST extension for special-use mailboxes
by Nikolay Shopik 01 Jun '10

01 Jun '10

On 20.05.2010 14:40, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 20.5.2010, at 12.11, Nikolay Shopik wrote: > >> I don't think this really need per-user option. This is basically "system folders" and MUA will decide on their local names. Combining with autocreate plugin seems reasonable. > > Autocreate plugin would be useful only if it was a per-user option. Then it could create some kind of a file into the created mailbox. > > If it was a global option .. could it be just something as simple as > > list_specialuse = \Trash:Trash "\Sent:Sent Messages" etc. > > or > > list_specialuse_trash = Trash > list_specialuse_sent = Sent > etc. > > I don't really like either of them.. > What's wrong with these examples for global option, second one looks good for me.

3 4