January 2014 - dovecot

[Dovecot] dsync replication errors
by Oli Schacher 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

Hi I'm trying to build a cluster of two servers with dsync replication (based on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication) My test setup works fine for very simple tests, I can log in to both servers, copy a message to one of the servers and it successfully apperars in the other account. But, if I try to copy a large amount of messages at once to one of the accounts, my maillogs get flodded with errors(see below) and the mailboxes seem to get out of sync and messages are duplicated over and over again (I originally copied 100 messages and ended up with thousands in both mailboxes until I killed dovecot) I'd appreciate if someone could have a look at my config and tell me what I did wrong. dovecot.conf of both servers, they are identical except for the target ip in mail_replica: dovecot -n # 2.2.beta1 (070ca24e5846+): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final) disable_plaintext_auth = no mail_plugins = " notify replication" namespace { inbox = yes location = prefix = separator = / type = private } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } plugin { mail_replica = remote:vmail@192.168.23.62 } protocols = pop3 imap service aggregator { fifo_listener replication-notify-fifo { user = vmail } unix_listener replication-notify { user = vmail } } service auth { unix_listener auth-master { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } user = root } service replicator { process_min_avail = 1 } ssl = no userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } Log on server1 after I copied 100 messages to an account on that server: Jan 31 10:41:04 doco1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<user1>, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.23.130, lip=192.168.23.61, mpid=1432, session=<OdjlbJLUmwDAqBeC> Jan 31 10:42:12 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=72, file=1359625327.M621257P1432.doco1,S=2472,W=2547:2,) Jan 31 10:42:12 doco1 dovecot: dsync-local(user1): Error: Recent flags state corrupted for mailbox INBOX Jan 31 10:42:12 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=73, file=1359625327.M740847P1432.doco1,S=2417,W=2492:2,) Jan 31 10:42:12 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=74, file=1359625328.M206735P1432.doco1,S=2400,W=2474:2,) Jan 31 10:42:12 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=75, file=1359625328.M668118P1432.doco1,S=2421,W=2496:2,) Jan 31 10:42:12 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=76, file=1359625329.M167578P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559:2,) Jan 31 10:42:13 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=77, file=1359625329.M520528P1432.doco1,S=2525,W=2604:2,) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 132: 1359625329.M520528P1432.doco1,S=2525,W=2604 (uid 77 -> 133) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 133: 1359625327.M621257P1432.doco1,S=2472,W=2547 (uid 72 -> 134) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 134: 1359625327.M740847P1432.doco1,S=2417,W=2492 (uid 73 -> 135) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 135: 1359625328.M206735P1432.doco1,S=2400,W=2474 (uid 74 -> 136) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 136: 1359625328.M668118P1432.doco1,S=2421,W=2496 (uid 75 -> 137) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 137: 1359625329.M167578P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559 (uid 76 -> 138) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 139: 1359625329.M782065P1432.doco1,S=2461,W=2539 (uid 78 -> 140) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 140: 1359625329.M973834P1432.doco1,S=2523,W=2602 (uid 79 -> 141) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 141: 1359625330.M114922P1432.doco1,S=2546,W=2626 (uid 80 -> 142) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 142: 1359625330.M255922P1432.doco1,S=2467,W=2546 (uid 81 -> 143) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 143: 1359625330.M403257P1432.doco1,S=2534,W=2611 (uid 82 -> 144) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 144: 1359625330.M486295P1432.doco1,S=2451,W=2529 (uid 83 -> 145) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Unexpected GUID mismatch for UID=85: 1359625327.M740847P1432.doco1,S=2417,W=2492 != 2e1b1ee97994566870c02910ea929091 Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625329.M167578P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559 (UID=175) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625329.M167578P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559 (UID=150) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625329.M520528P1432.doco1,S=2525,W=2604 (UID=176) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625329.M520528P1432.doco1,S=2525,W=2604 (UID=179) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625327.M740847P1432.doco1,S=2417,W=2492 (UID=123) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625327.M740847P1432.doco1,S=2417,W=2492 (UID=147) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625328.M668118P1432.doco1,S=2421,W=2496 (UID=174) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625328.M668118P1432.doco1,S=2421,W=2496 (UID=149) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625328.M206735P1432.doco1,S=2400,W=2474 (UID=173) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625328.M206735P1432.doco1,S=2400,W=2474 (UID=148) Jan 31 10:42:16 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Importing mailbox INBOX failed Jan 31 10:42:16 doco1 dovecot: dsync-local(user1): Error: read(vmail(a)192.168.23.62) failed: EOF Jan 31 10:42:16 doco1 dovecot: dsync-local(user1): Error: Remote command returned error 75 Jan 31 10:42:20 doco1 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=1359625329.M167578P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559 (UID=230) [...] Log on server2: Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 132: 1359625329.M520528P1432.doco1,S=2525,W=2604 (uid 77 -> 133) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 133: 1359625327.M621257P1432.doco1,S=2472,W=2547 (uid 72 -> 134) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 134: 1359625327.M740847P1432.doco1,S=2417,W=2492 (uid 73 -> 135) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 135: 1359625328.M206735P1432.doco1,S=2400,W=2474 (uid 74 -> 136) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 136: 1359625328.M668118P1432.doco1,S=2421,W=2496 (uid 75 -> 137) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 137: 1359625329.M167578P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559 (uid 76 -> 138) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 139: 1359625329.M782065P1432.doco1,S=2461,W=2539 (uid 78 -> 140) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 140: 1359625329.M973834P1432.doco1,S=2523,W=2602 (uid 79 -> 141) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 141: 1359625330.M114922P1432.doco1,S=2546,W=2626 (uid 80 -> 142) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 142: 1359625330.M255922P1432.doco1,S=2467,W=2546 (uid 81 -> 143) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 143: 1359625330.M403257P1432.doco1,S=2534,W=2611 (uid 82 -> 144) Jan 31 10:42:14 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: /mailstore/user1/maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 144: 1359625330.M486295P1432.doco1,S=2451,W=2529 (uid 83 -> 145) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=84, file=1359625330.M608391P1432.doco1,S=2480,W=2559:2,) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=85, file=1359625330.M813949P1432.doco1,S=2427,W=2502:2,) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=86, file=1359625331.M217320P1432.doco1,S=2547,W=2625:2,) Jan 31 10:42:15 doco2 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(user1): Warning: Maildir /mailstore/user1/maildir: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=87, file=1359625331.M688431P1432.doco1,S=2529,W=2609:2,) [...] Thanks Oli -- message transmitted on 100% recycled electrons

7 45

[Dovecot] Dovecot FTS using ElasticSearch
by Darvin Denmian 21 Jul '15

21 Jul '15

Hi, I would like to know if is possible to use ElasticSearch instead of Solr for FTS. Regards, Erick Vitor de Barros.

6 6

[Dovecot] imapc - different settings for different namespaces
by Timo Sirainen 20 Mar '15

20 Mar '15

Originally I was planning on allowing all kinds of mail settings inside namespace {}, including imapc_* settings. But that's a bit difficult to implement (although I think it will happen some day). So for now I was thinking: imapc foo { host = imap.foo.com master_user = foomaster password = foopass } imapc bar { host = imap.bar.com ... } namespace { prefix = foo/ location = imapc:foo } namespace { prefix = bar/ location = imapc:bar } So basically if the path after imapc isn't absolute (/path or ~/path), then treat the path as the imapc section name and use its settings. Anyone have any improvement suggestions? I was planning on adding this to v2.2.3. I'm not sure if the section names should be "imapc" or something else (e.g. imap_remote {}).

2 2

[Dovecot] Sieve vacation not working
by Phill Edwards 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

I've been trying all night to get vacation working in my .dovecot.sieve file. The way our email works is we have one account on dovecot which serves my mail and my wife's and we use procmail and sieve to put the emails in different folders depending on who it's for. I'm trying to set up a vacation reply on my wife's email address (aaaaaaaa@optus* below) so people can update to her new address. Here's my file with the email addresses masked: require ["fileinto", "vacation"]; if address :is "to" "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(a)ozemail.com.au" { fileinto "Phill_OzEmail_Folder"; stop; } elsif address :is "to" "yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy(a)optusnet.com.au" { fileinto "Phill_Optus_Folder"; stop; } elsif address :matches "to" "aaaaaaaa@optus*" { vacation "Please update my email address to bbbbbbbbb(a)exemail.com.au"; fileinto "Sarah_Optus_Folder"; stop; } else { keep; stop; } The problem I'm having is that no auto-replies are sent. I removed .dovecot.lda-dupes and that didn't help; so then I touched it and now it's a 0 byte file and that didn't help. There is no dovecot.sieve.err file and I can't see anything in /var/log/dovecot.log which gives any message about why this wouldn't work. The emails to aaaaaaa@optus* get filed into the right folder so I know the matching is working. I've also tried a reject recipe and that worked fine, so I know that it can send an email if it chooses to. So it's a complete black box mystery as to why it just won't send a reply. Regards, Phill

5 9

[Dovecot] Disk Encryption
by Simon Brereton 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

Hi As I understand it email headers need to be unencrypted (otherwise DKIM doesn't work). From the MUA to either Postfix, or Dovecot the connection is (or can/should be) secured with TLS/SSL. What I would like to know is if it is possible to encrypt the mailstore? Postfix is using Dovecot for delivery so it's only Dovecot that would need to encrypt/decrypt the mailstore. Is this possible? Is there a terrible reason to do it even if it is possible? I realise that from MTA to MTA there's no guarantee of encryption (and in fact it's very unlikely unless keys have been exchanged), but my primary goal is supplement the physical security of the mail store of mails we already have or have sent. Mostly just idle curiosity as to what has been done, or what could be done. What is worth doing is a separate thread entirely. Thanks. Simon

11 28

[Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE
by Michael J Rubinsky 09 Jun '14

09 Jun '14

I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some background, this is from Horde's ActiveSync library, when it is trying to determine what UIDs have recently been expunged. I can guarantee that when this command was sent, there was only one or two emails that were removed since the provided MODSEQ value. C: 8 UID FETCH 1:* UID (VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE 587742) S: * VANISHED (EARLIER) 1:119944,119947:123482,123484:128043,128045:130388,130390:130456,130458:132127,132129:135832,135834:136201,136203:136301,136303:136316,136318:138502,138504:140099,140101:141908,141910:142607,142609:142744,142746:142865,142867:143160,143164:143173,143176:143179,143181:143187,143189:143190,143192:143195,143197:143270,143272:143273,143275:143280,143282:143302,143305:143307,143309:143318,143320:143333,143335:143337,143339:143341,143343:143375,143377:143400,143402:143551,143553:143637,143640:143706,143708:144069,144071:144178,144180:144307,144309:144316,144318:144329,144331:144931,144933:144983,144985:145000,145002:145069,145071:145072,145074:145132,145136:145178,145180:145191,145193 Also, to verify it wasn't something screwy with my server, Michael Slusarz provided me with this from his server: <quote> There's definitely something wonky going on in the code. There's a certain tipping point of modseqs where the values become incorrect. For a mailbox with HIGHESTMODSEQ of 54004, I see this: a uid fetch 1:* UID (VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE 53881) * VANISHED (EARLIER) 1:37308,37310:40788,40791:41032,41034:41083 a OK Fetch completed. b uid fetch 1:* UID (VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE 53882) * VANISHED (EARLIER) 41029:41030,41047:41083 b OK Fetch completed. </quote> Thanks for any guidance. -- mike The Horde Project (www.horde.org) mrubinsk(a)horde.org

4 21

[Dovecot] allow_nets + default + ldap
by Andreas Schulze 21 May '14

21 May '14

Hello, I'm playing with allow_nets function. It is really cool! In a filebased passwd backend you simply add "allow_nets=192.0.2.143/32" as mentioned in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets But if I use an LDAP backend it looks different. Following http://wiki2.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP/AuthBinds and http://wiki2.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP/Userdb#Attribute_templates_.28v2… my pass_attrs looks this: pass_attrs = =user=%{ldap:uid}, \ =allow_nets=%{ldap:allownets} Using this syntax I could add an attribute "allownets" in the ldapserver to limit access for a user. A problem occour if the attribute is not present. For example if a user should not be limited or only some but not any user should be limited. So I extend my pass_attrs with a default. pass_attrs = =user=%{ldap:uid}, \ =allow_nets=%{ldap:allownets:10.0.0.0/8} Again, that's fine. Any user was allowed to connect from my private network. But then some users connect via ipv6. I tried to extend my default to pass_attrs = =user=%{ldap:uid}, \ =allow_nets=%{ldap:allownets:10.0.0.0/8,fec0::/16} That syntax, a comma separated list, produces errors no matter if quoting using " or ' or no quoting at all. So I looked at the source (thanks, it's open!) and wrote a little patch to allow simple defaults: - ALL -> allow any address - NONE -> deny any address Now I could write pass_attrs = =user=%{ldap:uid}, =allow_nets=%{ldap:allownets:ALL} or pass_attrs = =user=%{ldap:uid}, =allow_nets=%{ldap:allownets:NONE} to allow or deny any ldap account not having an attribute allownets. Maybe there are other solutions, but that's my way... Andreas

2 3

[Dovecot] Dovecot quoting problem?
by Gerhard Wiesinger 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hello Timo, I think the following commit makes problems: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/68a8b650578e # Doesn't work A01 LIST "" ~/Mail/Gesendet # OK with quoted mailbox A02 LIST "" "~/Mail/Gesendet" Details: imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS SPECIAL-USE BINARY MOVE] Logged in as user A01 LIST "" ~/Mail/Gesendet A01 BAD Error in IMAP command LIST: literal8 not allowed here A02 LIST "" "~/Mail/Gesendet" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" ~/Mail/Gesendet A02 OK List completed. A03 STATUS ~/Mail/Gesendet (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT) A03 BAD Error in IMAP command STATUS: literal8 not allowed here A04 STATUS "~/Mail/Gesendet" (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT) * STATUS ~/Mail/Gesendet (MESSAGES 0 RECENT 0 UNSEEN 0) A04 OK Status completed. Is this a bug of dovecot or a bug of the IMAP client (roundcube mail)? Thank you Ciao, Gerhard

2 2

[Dovecot] BUG report: doveadm HEADER <field> <pattern> when concatenating with another Search key
by megodin＠inboxalias.com 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hey there, I'm pretty sure I've found a bug with doveadm when concatenating with another search key. While doveadm HEADER <field pattern> works fine when not using additional search keys, it doesn't work properly when concatenating with other serarch keys - it then simply seems to ignore the additional HEADER <field pattern> search key. It's reproduceable, also with different user accounts on 2 different productive systems. Testing it on latest dovecot-ee 2.2.9.2 and 2.2.5.5. I think it's best explained with showing some examples: doveadm search -u exampleuser SUBJECT Silvester (outputs correctly 10 matches) 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1106 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1107 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1579 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 4092 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 5330 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 9773 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 11460 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 12718 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15653 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15697 doveadm search -u exampleuser SUBJECT Silvester HEADER Return-Path someuser(a)example.com (gives exactly the same output - but this is WRONG, as the given Subject AND Return-Path is really only found in 1 Message - uid 15697) 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1106 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1107 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1579 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 4092 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 5330 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 9773 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 11460 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 12718 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15653 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15697 doveadm search -u exampleuser HEADER Return-Path someuser(a)example.com (showing that Return-Path as standalone search key is working fine - note that message uid 15697 with subject "Silvester" is also found of course. I manually checked all Mails showing up here, they all contained the Return-Path "someuser(a)example.com" as they should): 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14080 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14814 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14815 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14820 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14825 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14830 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14832 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 14833 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15427 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15428 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15430 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15431 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15697 Further testing with: doveadm search -u exampleuser HEADER Return-Path completegarbageforsurenotinheaders (Correctly no output was given.) doveadm search -u exampleuser SUBJECT Silvester HEADER Return-Path completegarbageforsurenotinheaders (again ignoring the additional HEADER and showing all uids which just match the SUBJECT) 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1106 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1107 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 1579 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 4092 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 5330 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 9773 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 11460 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 12718 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15653 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15697 Moreove, when playing with HEADER Reply-To it shows some strange behaviour, note the differences with the ":" : doveadm search -u exampleuser SUBJECT blubbs HEADER Reply-to kacke(a)example.com f64cf50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 2231 f64cf50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 2781 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 13620 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 15763 doveadm search -u exampleuser SUBJECT blubbs HEADER Reply-to: kacke(a)example.com f64cf50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 2231 5a09f50926daef51b50e000025ab05f8 13620 Can you please have a look at this and fix it? Thanks in advance, Megodin -- mailstorage @ NFS with nfsvers=3 (NetApp) # 2.2.5.5 (e5350245ad9b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) nfs import_environment = TZ DEBUG_OUTOFMEM DOVECOT_HOSTDOMAIN # 2.2.9.2 (8d71ef248a6e): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.5 (Final) nfs _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive anonymous emails to your inbox with InboxAlias. http://www.inboxalias.com

2 1

[Dovecot] New global ACL mailbox pattern feature in HG
by Thomas Leuxner 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hi, I played around with changeset 9376bf098692 a bit. Right now I'm unsure how to describe a namespace using this feature. Using something like 'Public/*" doesn't seem to work while 'Public*" does, but would also potentially alter non-related mailboxes elsewhere: $ cat global-acl INBOX owner lrwstiekxap Public* group=PublicMailboxAdmins lrwsik Regards Thomas

2 8