April 2016 - dovecot - dovecot.org

What is dovecot.socket and do i need it?
by Hamy 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Helloafter rebooting the server, i keep getting these errors in mail.err : Apr 7 06:08:09 main dovecot: master: Error: systemd listens on port 143, but it's not configured in Dovecot. Closing. Apr 7 06:08:09 main dovecot: master: Error: systemd listens on port 993, but it's not configured in Dovecot. Closing. Apr 7 06:08:09 main dovecot: master: Error: systemd listens on port 993, but it's not configured in Dovecot. Closing. And then dovecot refuses any connection. the problem is solved if i do a manual restart of dovecot.service. After some search, i found 2 different solutions, one suggesting disabling dovecot.socket completely, the other one adjusting its settings: https://sowhatisthesolution.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/upgrading-dovecot-debi… I also found an old thread in the mailing list that might be relevant: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March/134376.html The errors indeed seem to go away if i disable dovecot.socket . I would be grateful is someone could help me understand the role of dovecot.socket , and why that error happens and what is the right way to solve it? PS: I am using Ubuntu server 15.10 and dovecot package v2.2.18 Best Regards,

1 0

RE: State for dsync not working
by Simon Pierre Desrosiers 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

No one will answer, so I will provide my own answer for posterity. The -s flag does not accept a file, but a string. So a correct for loop would be the following : for user in $userlist ; do state=$(cat "/Users/_dovecot/.bin/syncStates/syncstate$user" ) doveadm sync -u $user -s $state tcp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > "/Users/_dovecot/.bin/syncStates/syncstate$user" done Hope it helps someone. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:26:11 -0400 > From: Simon Pierre Desrosiers <simonpie(a)cs.mcgill.ca> > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: State for dsync not working. > Message-ID: <CAF2F45A-3F6A-4540-8C32-6551C6F27F7C(a)cs.mcgill.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hello, > > Since replication does not seem to work on Mac OSX, I will run doveadm sync by hand every few minutes. > > In order to improve efficiency, I would like to use state. I have tried a few ways, but I always get the following error > doveadm(user): Error: Saved sync state is invalid, falling back to full sync: Invalid base64 data > KBtMOd0181bQ/wAAoQsxE90181YBAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABtI+mg= > > > Here is the code I use to sync : > for user in $userlist ; do > doveadm sync -u $user -s "/Users/_dovecot/.bin/syncStates/syncstate$user" tcp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > "/Users/_dovecot/.bin/syncStates/syncstate$user" > done > > Any idea on how I can correct the encoding error ? > > Thank you > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:30:03 +1000 > From: Noel Butler <noel.butler(a)ausics.net> > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir > Message-ID: <79e7f44d74014b5c83d370d74e02205b(a)ausics.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > It seems its troll time again on this list, ohh maybe its Harry in > disguise... So I will play along, for today anyway :) > > > On 19/03/2016 18:11, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +1000 >> Noel Butler <noel.butler(a)ausics.net> wrote: >> >>> On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> and you've never seen these cause problems with FS? then you must be >>>>> a >>>>> newbie, in over 25 years I've seen it happen several times - yes even >>>>> after an apparent controlled shutdown. >>>> >>>> Maybe you're doing something wrong then. because in my last 21 years >>>> working >>>> exactly in this business I've not seen a single deadly fs-crash because >>>> of a >>>> power-outage. Not one. And we had of course several, all backed by UPS. >>> >>> Consider yourself lucky, Most network admins whove been around large >>> busy ISP DC's have seen this in their lifetime, to not have seen one >>> is >>> rare, go buy yourself a lotto ticket :) >>> >>>> >>>> If your servers get drowned with water during a fire your fs is >>>> probably the >>>> least of your worries. You don't really plan to re-enable servers with >>>> water- or fire-damage, do you? That's probably why there shouldn't be a >>>> fireman pouring water in the first place. >>> >>> This shows you dont understand structural engineering, the fire does >>> not >>> have to be on your floor, it can be far away as two or so levels >>> above, >>> with the high pressure water used - equating to a shitload of water, >>> there are ducts, shafts, other risers and so on that with a shit-tone >>> of >>> water can easily penetrate fireblocks of floors below - dont take my >>> work, go ask a fireman, or maybe watch the nightly news sometime >>> (building fire - many levels water affected blah blah blah)... so >>> keeping those boxes on via UPS's is asking for lots of charcoaled >>> boards >>> and fried drives. IOW, total stupidity. >>> >>> Should those machines be depowered as required by our building codes, >>> well, might take a few days of drying out but at least they will power >>> back up without error - yes, done it in risk assessments. >> > >> Obviously you must work for people that have not the slightest idea >> about >> using hardware in a correct way and don't know when the time has come >> to throw > >> it away. Man, there is no way to let a drowned box survive. It is not >> back to > > Wow, how long did you allege to have been in network/sys admin? 20 > years? Really? I think you made a typo and and it should have read 20 > minutes, ya know I have refrained from posting no here for a long time > (apart from fact I rarely read the list), and I was not going to feed > the trolls, but sometimes the smart mouthed know nothing, need to bitch > slap upside the head so thats why I am devoting about 60 seconds to you. > > Of course there is, networks dont throw away many hundreds of servers > valued $7K to $10K, nor $100K+ storage systems, or $40K routers, LB's or > switches, just because they got drenched - with power isolated. > > >> normal when it is dry. If you don't get that I am pretty happy to be no >> customer. This can only be an idea born in the sick mind of a >> controller who > > You will never be a customer _or_employee_ of mine, trust me on that > one! > >> didn't want to pay insurance in the first place. We are talking about >> serious > > Got nothing to with insurance, it might take 2 days to dry out and get > back up and running, it will take an awful lot longer to get offsite > backups and restore every last one of them. > > I hope your employer reads this list, because he/she should be seeing > alarm bells from your comments. > >> corrosion effects here let alone that you have a hard time even >> knowning when > > yep, you sure did fail basic engineering > >> your boxes are really dry. Your fireman on the other hand seem to be >> stuck in >> the 80ths. Today there are solar panels almost everywhere _which you >> cannot >> turn off_. > > Wow, you really are clutching the fantasy straws arnt you, perhaps your > country lacks modernisation, I can go to the side of my house and > isolate the panels with a flick of a switch, strangely enough and I > guess in your eyes horrifyingly called "solar isolator" that stops the > panels providing power to my electrical circuits, yes, there might be > power from panels to it, but thats not going to affect my power circuits > or equipment > > > > -- > If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list, you best > first read http://members.ausics.net/qwerty/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:34:34 +1000 > From: Noel Butler <noel.butler(a)ausics.net> > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: Email hosting provider > Message-ID: <2b1abc9c94e3f1322753d7547cb991e4(a)ausics.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Sorry if I am off topic a little. >> >> I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve >> and manage sieve. Ideally with the roundcube webmail and managesieve >> plugin >> >> Better if it is in Europe or switzerland. I don't mind paying a little. >> >> Thanks, >> Andr?. > > Hi Andre, > > see www.webhostingtalk.com > > There are a number of reliable and reasonable priced hosts in Germany > (best place if you value your privacy) and Netherlands. > > > -- > If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list, you best > first read http://members.ausics.net/qwerty/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:52:33 +0530 > From: Joy <pj.netfilter(a)gmail.com> > To: Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com> > Cc: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> > Subject: Re: IMAP Idle > Message-ID: > <CALM64LbXF_Nw+7STyxHMnjLNujEcTsc5mEXMA8DXaZuNX4pvpA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I am ok if connection is closed automatically after 30 min if client is not > responding but connection is not being closed even after 2 days. > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Joy <pj.netfilter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We have implement imap idle in web mail built by us to have >>> push mail feature. IMAP idle working perfectly with browser notification >>> and we are happy with it but having one issue with users who close the >>> browser directly and never logout in that case there are number of idle >>> connection which are not in use and users are unable to login once IP wise >>> connection limit is reached. >>> >>> Dovecot is not closing connection which are not in use, is there any >>> setting available which can help me to resolve this issue. >>> >> >> I had much the same situation where a user signed up with a roaming >> wireless carrier that assigned a new IP to the client whenever it got >> passed from one access point to another. Good fun when this person >> took a bus ride through the city, leaving orphaned connections in >> its wake. >> >> The IDLE disconnection timeout is hardwired in the Dovecot code >> >> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Timeouts >> >> It's set to the RFC minimum of 30min. You'll have to recompile Dovecot >> to lower this to a non-RFC compliant value. I'm not sure how this this >> will affect clients, but 30min seems to be overly generous. >> >> Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com> >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 08:04:33 +0100 > From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw(a)ithnet.com> > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: Email hosting provider > Message-ID: <20160326080433.07fcf216.skraw(a)ithnet.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:34:34 +1000 > Noel Butler <noel.butler(a)ausics.net> wrote: > >> On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Sorry if I am off topic a little. >>> >>> I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve >>> and manage sieve. Ideally with the roundcube webmail and managesieve >>> plugin >>> >>> Better if it is in Europe or switzerland. I don't mind paying a little. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andr?. >> >> Hi Andre, >> >> see www.webhostingtalk.com >> >> There are a number of reliable and reasonable priced hosts in Germany >> (best place if you value your privacy) and Netherlands. > > You mean "best place if you have no idea of the german laws and whats really > going on" ... > > -- > Regards, > Stephan > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:48:47 +0000 > From: michael crane <mick.crane(a)gmail.com> > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: mailbox prefix > Message-ID: > <CACJbxCQ5by9eXKtAMfJ7aa1C2hCkmph=LbyUqn2yv6w=0hVseQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > dovecot version 2.2.13 > > hello, > I try to make a new server just for me after having old one working for > ages with Dovecot, Fetchmail, Squirrelmail, Procmail > making new one with above plus Postfix using Maildir structure. > I am having a bit of trouble understanding exactly what the namespace and > prefix are. > Is the "private/" prefix an internal thing with Dovecot ? Or is it supposed > to be a real directory ? > I'm not quite sure how to properly address the INBOX in Procmail, > Squirrelmail, Postfix config. > > > for example am I supposed to say inbox is ".private/.INBOX" > > > > cheers > > zemlik > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > dovecot mailing list > dovecot(a)dovecot.org > http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot > > ------------------------------ > > End of dovecot Digest, Vol 155, Issue 45 > ****************************************

1 0

"Lost" e-mail after alternate partition offline
by Daniel van Ham Colchete 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hey guys! I've got a problem here and I wish you could help me. A drive failed here and went offline for some time. This was a alternate storage drive so it took a while (hours) for us to notice. There was a problem with DRBD also, so it didn't move to the redundancy, it just went offline. I was able to recover all the files there, but a few of my users still don't see their old e-mails, the ones that are supposed to be on the alternate storage. >From what I could troubleshoot here file are there, vmail user can access them, so it's not a permission issue, but a doveadm dump on the index file of each mail folder, won't show the e-mail at the alternate storage drive. So, they are there (at the filesystem), but they aren't (from a imap client). Is there a way to rebuild the dovecot.index file, re-adding everything back to each folder? Best, Daniel Colchete

2 1

namespace...mailbox doesn't exist
by Eric 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Hello list, I have a namespace called 'projects' which when clicked in Thunderbird (nonexistent in eM Client) yields the following error: "The current operation on 'projects' did not succeed. The mail server for account user(a)domain.tld responded: mailbox doesn't exist: projects.projects (0.00 + 0.00 secs)." The namespace is configure as follows: # Shared namespace 'projects' namespace { location = maildir:/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/shared/projects prefix = projects. separator = . type = public } This is the log: 1: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: Effective uid=89, gid=89, home=/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/postmaster 2: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: Quota root: name=ignore=Trash backend=maildir args= 3: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: Quota rule: root=ignore=Trash mailbox=? bytes=0 messages=0 4: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: Quota grace: root=ignore=Trash bytes=0 (10%) 5: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: Namespace : type=private, prefix=, sep=., inbox=yes, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes location= 6: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: mdbox: access(/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/postmaster/mdbox, rwx): failed: No such file or directory 7: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: mdbox: couldn't find root dir 8: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: sdbox: access(/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/postmaster/sdbox, rwx): failed: No such file or directory 9: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: sdbox: couldn't find root dir 10: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: maildir: root exists (/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/postmaster/Maildir) 11: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: maildir++: root=/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/postmaster/Maildir, index=, indexpvt=, control=, inbox=/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/postmaster/Maildir, alt= 12: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: Namespace : type=public, prefix=projects., sep=., inbox=no, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes location=maildir:/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/shared/projects 13: Apr 04 20:00:30 imap(postmaster(a)domain.tld): Debug: maildir++: root=/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/shared/projects, index=, indexpvt=, control=, inbox=, alt= This did not happen with other versions of dovecot (I think) but just started happening with the upgrade. While it is not a serious problem and I can live with it, what would be causing it in the new dovecot iteration (2.2.23) ? And, could it be that I'm missing the necessary setting to mitigate this? Please let me know if any additional information is necessary. I'm thinking that the problem lies in lines 6/7 and 8/9 where Dovecot is looking for mdbox/sdbox. Eric

3 5

Migrating from Olde server to Dovecot
by Hendrik Velloen 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Hi I am new to the mailing List, and was hoping to get some assistance migrating from an Old Cucipop + Sendmail server (running on a old Redhat v 7) to a new Dovecot setup. My new installation is Dovecot + Postfix. All is setup and working, however I want to trasnsfer the contents of the mailboxes from my old server to this new Dovecot setup. Please let me know what information will be required to transfer the mailboxes - I have tried a number of things, but with no luck. I think the correct method is the one below, but I am getting UIDL errors and AUTH errors and not sure if this is the right approach ---- PLEASE HELP dsync -u <DOVECOT_USER> mirror mbox:~/mail:INBOX=<MAIL_BOX_COPIED_FROM_OLD_SERVER> ~# dsync -u hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za mirror mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/User_mbox/hendrikv dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: pop3c(196.26.136.162): AUTH PLAIN failed: -ERR Invalid command, try one of: USER name, PASS string, APOP name digest, QUIT dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: pop3c: Disconnected from remote server dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: pop3_migration: Couldn't sync mailbox POP3-MIGRATION-NS/INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2016-04-04 08:27:01] dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=ddbe5c71e58919cfe2a40905bced091d (UID=3054) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=64087a4c7bf960114cf17ba044047900 (UID=374) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=fd28baf9e91aedaf06c6e979ca76e96f (UID=2982) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=607087e611559d2df02c0684de87e10d (UID=991) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=c6a9aebd1f535f0cd82ed612a42bae77 (UID=1541) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=4c56ffcfb600c8b216b2f1603383dc13 (UID=1007) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=96ce5556fab323206f51deb03625be8a (UID=2357) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=cda74cb161321b7c99973cc65e80a591 (UID=1401) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=b735acf7ef69b39be157a97223878cdc (UID=642) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=6d9baedf21198be32152461f96737a1a (UID=481) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Remote didn't send mail GUID=19f36b934b74ce11f1eda95e32a0b112 (UID=1998) dsync(hendrikv(a)tcmvpn.co.za): Error: Exporting mailbox INBOX failed: Can't lookup pop3-uidl for UID=1: POP3 UIDLs couldn't be synce -- Kind Regards Hendrik

4 3

Internal quota calculation error (redis), double mail delivery
by Tom Sommer 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Sometimes my redis connection times out, both for pop3, imap and lmtp. I have no idea why, when I do a "doveadm quota recalc -u" it works just fine? I'm thinking the connection is lost somehow and not retried? Apr 06 15:42:00 lmtp(xxx(a)xxx.com): Error: redis: Lookup timed out in 30.000 secs Apr 06 15:42:00 lmtp(xxx(a)xxx.com): Error: Internal quota calculation error Apr 06 15:42:00 lmtp(xxx(a)xxx.com): Error: Internal quota calculation error Apr 06 15:42:00 lmtp(xxx(a)xxx.com): Info: xxxx: msgid=<xxxx(a)xxxx.com>: saved mail to INBOX Apr 06 15:49:23 lmtp(xxx(a)xxx.com): Info: xxxx: msgid=<xxxx(a)xxxx.com>: saved mail to INBOX <-- Same mail This happens a lot, and it's really bad, because the mail is actually saved correctly, but the error is reported back to the Director, causing the delivery to be retried by the MTA - so the mail actually lands *twice* in the user's inbox. Thanks -- Tom

2 4

LMTP with alias addresses
by davide marchi 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Hi, my problem is this: if i use lmtp for delivery and lookup for real_virtual_user(a)mydomain.com all function perfectly and mails are delivered correctly (quota and presence of user also) but if i send an email to real_alias_address(a)mydomain.com LMTP service (it's an alias containing several users) dosen't find user. How can i resolve this problem? for completeness my system users is based on vpopmail userdb

2 1

Session ID separator change
by Timo Sirainen 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

LMTP is a but troublesome in that a single LMTP session can do multiple RCPT TOs, so the same session will end up delivering mails to multiple different users. This is causing trouble with stats process, because each delivery is using the same session ID for multiple different users, which causes errors about session ID duplication in stats process. So we'll need to make the session IDs unique, while still keeping it clear enough that they're part of the same original LMTP session (which is also visible in th Received: headers). I'm now thinking that the first recipient's delivery will have the original normal session ID (e.g. "ME3ZHCi+A1dUDQAAvAUe3g"), while the following recipients will have :2, :3, etc suffix (e.g. "ME3ZHCi+A1dUDQAAvAUe3g:2"). If somebody cares about parsing the original session ID from logs, they can just cut off the session ID from the first ':' character (because indexer-worker also adds its own :suffix). So now I'm mainly wondering if ':' is a good character? Has somebody already changed mail_log_prefix in a way that these additional ':' chars might break their log parsers (e.g. mail_log_prefix=%u:%s%{session}:%r).

3 3

Unable to login with iPhone?
by Jason Pruim 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Hey Everyone, So I have my dovecot install up and running! I can receive mail from the outside, still dealing with a small issue with sending email, but I think that's an issue off needing to setup a relay... Right now though... My biggest issue is it won't connect to my iPhone... I can login with mail on my computer, and through round cube for webmail... But it gets stuck on "verifying"... I tried addingcram-md5 and digest-md5 to the auth_mechanisms but that didn't work... Any idea what I'm missing? Here is my doveconf -n: [ec2-user@ip-172-31-28-46 postfix]$ doveconf -n # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 4.4.5-15.26.amzn1.x86_64 x86_64 ext4 auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 digest-md5 mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave mbox_write_locks = fcntl namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = prefix = separator = . } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve } service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } unix_listener auth-userdb { group = vmail mode = 0666 user = vmail } } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 143 } inet_listener imaps { port = 993 ssl = yes } } ssl = required ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/mailserver.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/mailserver.pem ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 userdb { args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/var/vmail/%d/%n driver = static } protocol lda { mail_plugins = " sieve" } [ec2-user@ip-172-31-28-46 postfix]$ If I try to telnet to port 993 from my local computer it connects, but won't let me login... Same on port 143... Any ideas? Thanks everyone for your help! I can't wait until I can actually help with the questions instead of just asking them!

3 2

dovecot squatter
by Gabriele Bulfon 05 Apr '16

05 Apr '16

Hi, on cyrus installations we have the squatter utility that can index full message bodies and headers incrementally, allowing to run the squatter from time to time to arrange for index changes. Is there anything similar in Dovecot? This is expecially useful for full searches in body message. Thanks for any help Gabriele ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon

2 1