January 2017 - dovecot

Dict protocol changes string
by Nagy, Attila 13 Mar '17

13 Mar '17

Hi, I use pass and userdb with dict protocol in a similar way: key passdb { key = passdb^MAuth-User: %u^MAuth-Pass: %w^MAuth-Protocol: %s^MClient-IP: %r format = json } (^M is an \r character, inserted with vi CTRL-v + enter) Until 2.2.24 this has worked, but 2.2.25 seems to convert that ASCII 13 into an ASCII 1 and an "r". Python printout from what I get with 2.2.25: 'Lshared/passdb\x01rAuth-User: user\x01rAuth-Pass: pass\x01rAuth-Protocol: pop3\x01rClient-IP: 1.2.3.4' Is this change intentional? Why?

2 4

fts_solr and connection via https://
by Jan Vonde 04 Mar '17

04 Mar '17

Hi, I am trying to get fts_solr working and my index server is available via HTTPS only. Dovecot is running on a Debian Jessie system and the Solr server has a letsencrypt certificate. My dovecot version is: 2.2.devel (a9ed8ae) The current setup is: 10-mail.conf: mail_plugins = fts fts_solr 90-fts.conf: plugin { fts = solr fts_autoindex = yes fts_solr = url=https://foo.example.com/solr/dovecot/ } When I try to index the mailboxes I am getting error messages like this: doveadm(user@host): Error: fts_solr: Lookup failed: 9002 Couldn't initialize SSL context: Can't verify remote server certs without trusted CAs (ssl_client_ca_* settings) doveadm(user@host): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Status lookup failed: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2017-01-22 09:52:38] Segmentation fault Contacting the index server via curl on the command line on the same host works, it returns HTTP 200: user@host ~ $ curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://foo.example.com/solr/ 200 user@host ~ $ Currently I have the following ssl related settings: user@host ~ $ doveconf -n -P | grep -i ssl ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/mail.example.org.crt ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:ALL:!aNULL:!ADH:!eNULL:!EXP:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/mail.example.org.key ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 I tried adding the following settings but that didn't help: ssl_ca = < /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt ssl_client_ca_dir = /etc/ssl/certs Can you give me a hint how I can get the ssl certificate accepted? Thanks in advance and have a nice day, Jan :-)

2 10

Sieve removeflag Action
by Thomas Leuxner 26 Feb '17

26 Feb '17

Hi, I recently noticed that some of my automatically processed mails do no longer show flags with current Dovecot builds. This used to work before, not sure what broke it or whether I used it in the wrong way. When the removeflag line is dropped *both* messages get flagged in the client, one in INBOX and one in Trash. With removeflag in place, *both* messages are unflagged, the one in INBOX and the one in Trash. This used to work differently before if memory doesn't fail me. #Test if address :is "From" "user(a)example.com" { addflag "\\Flagged $MailFlagBit1"; keep; removeflag "\\Flagged $MailFlagBit1"; fileinto "Trash"; } # 2.2.devel (01867a4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.devel (3c071a4) # OS: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.6 Regards Thomas

4 18

Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)
by Reuben Farrelly 26 Feb '17

26 Feb '17

Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type setup where almost all of the reads and writes happen to just one of the two hosts. They are both running 2.2.devel (9dc6403), which is close to the latest 2.2 -git . Pigeonhole is running master-0.4 . This is on x86_64 Gentoo. Normal mail replication between Maildir's for all users works fine, however it appears that something recently committed to the code has broken sieve script replication between the two. I am sure this did once work. Replication is via tcps: . Sieve scripts on the lesser-used host are not up to date by an order of days/weeks with the main host and they don't seem to re-replicate - even if the rules don't exist at all on the replica. The symptoms and effects look to be the same as this (unanswered) post from December: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2015-December/102690.html I am not sure how to view the transaction log files, but I am seeing the same symptoms, ie no live replication, and on the lesser-used host almost all the scripts were old and some had the 1970 date on them. Even after forcing a [dsync replication replicate '*'] the scripts are not replicated. As it stands now there are no sieve scripts on one of the two members and the system seems unable to replicate by itself. Secondly, I am also seeing some doubled up outputs if I run 'doveadm sieve list -A': thunderstorm reuben # doveadm sieve list -A reuben rules ACTIVE liam rules ACTIVE kaylene rules ACTIVE reuben rules ACTIVE liam rules ACTIVE kaylene rules ACTIVE ... Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve scripts actually replicating in live time for other 2.2.24/2.2.25 users as well? For me I didn't notice this till I went looking so I wonder if other people are experiencing this but just not aware of it yet...? Reuben

4 9

Replication sieve scripts.
by Luescher Claude 26 Feb '17

26 Feb '17

Hello, Following up on old thread: http://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2014-December/099003.html I have the exact same issue with 2.2.10: ii dovecot-antispam 2.0+20130822-2 amd64 Dovecot plugins for training spam filters ii dovecot-core 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - core files ii dovecot-imapd 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - IMAP daemon ii dovecot-ldap 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - LDAP support ii dovecot-lmtpd 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - LMTP server ii dovecot-managesieved 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server ii dovecot-mysql 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - MySQL support ii dovecot-pop3d 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - POP3 daemon ii dovecot-sieve 1:2.2.10-1 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - Sieve filters support As even his version should already support sieve replication through dsync mine would have to support it for sure but I would like to hear a confirmation from the developers. The mail sync just works perfectly between the 2 nodes, it is only the sieve scripts which don't get replicated. I have tried to add additional sieve related options to the replicator: service replicator { process_min_avail = 1 } plugin { mail_replica = tcp:1.2.3.4 replication_full_sync_interval = 1 hours #Added (makes no difference) sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve_after sieve_extensions = +vnd.dovecot.duplicate sieve_duplicate_period = 1h #Added (makes no difference) } service aggregator { fifo_listener replication-notify-fifo { user = vmail } unix_listener replication-notify { user = vmail } } It did not help. If there is one way I would like to get this work without upgrading dovecot. Thank you.

4 12

Pigeonhole External pipe script going zombie?
by Matt Simpson 23 Feb '17

23 Feb '17

I’m running dovecot 2.2.27 and pigeonhole 0.4.16 on FreeBSD 11. I’m using the pigeonhole/sieve external pipe plugin to run a Perl program to send a Pushover notification when certain messages are received. The Perl script is executed, and the notification is sent. But then the script task seems to go zombie until it is killed after a timeout. In the user’s sieve log, I get a message like error: msgid=<20170112191921.66140.qmail(a)v1.redhorse.me>: pipe action: failed to pipe message to program `sievepush.pl': refer to server log for more information. [2017-01-12 14:19:36]. (even though the message really was piped to the program successfully) In the dovecot server log, I see Jan 12 14:19:21 v1 dovecot: lda(matt): Debug: sieve: Executing script from `/usr/home/matt/maildoms/.dovecot.svbin' Jan 12 14:19:21 v1 dovecot: lda(matt): Debug: sieve: action pipe: running program: sievepush.pl Jan 12 14:19:21 v1 dovecot: lda(matt): Debug: Mailbox stdin: Opened mail UID=1 because: mail stream Jan 12 14:19:21 v1 dovecot: lda(matt): Debug: waiting for program `/usr/local/lib/dovecot/sieve-pipe/sievepush.pl' to finish after 0 msecs Jan 12 14:19:31 v1 dovecot: lda(matt): Debug: program `/usr/local/lib/dovecot/sieve-pipe/sievepush.pl'(66145) execution timed out after 10000 milliseconds: sending TERM signal Jan 12 14:19:36 v1 dovecot: lda(matt): Debug: program `/usr/local/lib/dovecot/sieve-pipe/sievepush.pl' (66145) did not die after 5000 milliseconds: sending KILL signal In the process list during that 10 second interval, I see matt 66142 29972 801 801 0 S - 0:00.00 bin/qmail-local -- matt /home/matt/maildoms jmn-matt - jmn-m matt 66143 66142 801 801 0 S - 0:00.00 /var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot matt 66144 66143 801 801 0 S - 0:00.01 /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda matt 66145 66144 801 801 0 Z - 0:00.65 <defunct> I’m not a Unix programming ace, but from what I’ve been able to find out, this seems to mean that the lda process is forking another process to run the pipe script, and not getting the proper notification when it finishes (not issuing a wait?). So after 10 seconds, it sends a TERM to the task which is no longer running, and when that doesn’t work, it sends a KILL. Anybody know what’s happening here? doveconf -n # 2.2.27 (c0f36b0): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.16 (fed8554) # OS: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64 auth_verbose = yes default_vsz_limit = 128 M lock_method = flock mail_debug = yes mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir mail_privileged_group = mail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext vnd.dovecot.pipe vnd.dovecot.execute namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = prefix = } passdb { args = imap driver = pam } plugin { recipient_delimiter = - sieve = file:~/sieve;active=~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_execute_bin_dir = /usr/local/lib/dovecot/sieve-pipe sieve_extensions = +vnd.dovecot.pipe +vnd.dovecot.execute sieve_pipe_bin_dir = /usr/local/lib/dovecot/sieve-pipe sieve_pipe_exec_timeout = 10s sieve_plugins = sieve_extprograms } protocols = imap service auth { unix_listener auth-master { group = qnofiles mode = 0660 user = alias } user = root } service imap-login { process_min_avail = 3 vsz_limit = 94 M } ssl_cert = </usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/dummy.redhorse.me/cert.pem ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it syslog_facility = local0 userdb { driver = passwd } verbose_proctitle = yes protocol lda { mail_plugins = " sieve" }

2 3

antispam plugin pipe backend error when moving multiple emails
by Stéphane Cottin 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

Hi, I've got some trouble with the dovecot antispam plugin and the pipe backend. I'm using dovecot 2.2.18 with maildirs and zlib compression enabled. When moving 2 or more emails at once from the Junk folder to another one, I always have the following error : "Failed to copy to temporary file" In the server logs : imap(vvv(a)vvv.vvv): Error: read(zlib(/data/Maildir/.test/tmp/1446974366.M123890P936.vvv)) failed: Cached message size smaller than expected (13553 < 13562, box=test, UID=0) The same operation with one email at a time, on the same emails, works as expected. Stéphane

2 2

Prohibit dots in folder names
by Marek Grondecki 10 Feb '17

10 Feb '17

Hello Dovecot Community, I am using Dovecot 2.2.13-12~deb8u1 (Debian Jessie). separator = / listescape plugin is NOT active LAYOUT=fs is NOT active I would like to prohibit a creation of folders with dot "." in the names - so creation of a folder "foo.bar" should NOT be possible. Currently, when I create "foo.bar" in Outlook 2013 it will be created but won't be synchronised with the mail server - Outlook shows it as "foo.bar (Only this computer)". Ideally the user should receive an error message informing that "the folder foo.bar could not be created." Thank you for your help. Regards, Marek Grondecki

3 4

Dovecot auth-worker error after cram-md5 auth
by Poliman - Serwis 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

I set up cram-md5 using this tutorial https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/CRAM-MD5 in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf in passdb code block: listen = *,[::] protocols = imap pop3 #auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 auth_mechanisms = cram-md5 plain login #dodana nizej linia ssl = required disable_plaintext_auth = yes log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S " mail_privileged_group = vmail postmaster_address = postmaster(a)vps342401.ovh.net ssl_cert = </etc/postfix/smtpd.cert ssl_key = </etc/postfix/smtpd.key ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 !TLSv1 !TLSv1.1 ssl_cipher_list = ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384[image: :D]HE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256[image: :D]HE-DSS-AES$ ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048 mail_max_userip_connections = 100 passdb { # args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf # driver = sql driver = passwd-file args = scheme=cram-md5 /etc/dovecot/cram-md5.pwd } userdb { driver = prefetch } userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } Of course I created cram-md5.pwd file. All mails go out and come nicely. But after I want to do default settings by commented out these two lines: driver = passwd-file args = scheme=cram-md5 /etc/dovecot/cram-md5.pwd and uncomment # args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf # driver = sql I can't send emails - I use Thunderbird - get error "logging on server mail.example.com not work out". Error in logs: dovecot: auth-worker(22698): Error: Auth worker sees different passdbs/userdbs than auth server. dovecot: auth: Error: read(anvil-auth-penalty) failed: EOF Is it possible that hashed password from cram-md5.pwd file was written to database (if yes then where - I have ISPconfig)? I wasn't change any userdb {} block and this second userdb block has this same lines like default settings in passdb block. -- *Pozdrawiam / Best Regards* *Piotr Bracha* *tel. 534 555 877* *serwis(a)poliman.pl <serwis(a)poliman.pl>*

4 25

Moving to new password scheme
by ＠lbutlr 02 Feb '17

02 Feb '17

dovecot is setup on a system with MD5-CRYPT password scheme for all users, and I would like to update this to something that is secure, probably SSHA256-CRYPT, but I want to do this seamlessly without the users having to jump through any hoops. The users are in mySQL (managed via postfixadmin) and the mailbox record simply stores the hash in the password field. Users access their accounts though IMAP MUAs or Roundcube. How would I setup my system so that if a user logs in and still has a $1$ password (MD5-CRYPT) their password will be encoded to the new SHCEME and then the SQL row updated with the $5$ password instead? Something where they are redirected after authentication to a page that forces them to renter their password (or choose a new one) is acceptable. And, while I am here, is it worthwhile to set the -r flag to a large number (like something over 100,000 which sets takes about 0.25 seconds to do on my machine)? -- Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures.

4 8