June 2022 - dovecot - dovecot.org

Multidomain ssl config ?
by Maurizio Caloro 16 Oct '22

16 Oct '22

on postfix now this seems to run, and with dovecot i need also handle this two domains, but appairing this error messages. like: Jun 29 20:49:28 Dovecot/imap-login: Info: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=a.b.c.d, lip=37.120.190.188, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:14094416:SSL routines: ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=<FdklDjkdfrkfi> Running with Debian Buster # dovecot --version 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4) # nmail.caloro.ch local_name nmail.caloro.ch { ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/live/nmail.caloro.ch/privkey.pem ssl_key = </etc/letsencrypt/live/nmail.caloro.ch/fullchain.pem } # nmail.calm-ness.ch local_name nmail.calm-ness.ch { ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/live/nmail.calm-ness.ch/privkey.pem ssl_key = </etc/letsencrypt/live/nmail.calm-ness.ch/fullchain.pem } thanks for possible help

6 5

Panic: file mail-index-transaction-finish.c: line 185
by tobisworld＠gmail.com 20 Sep '22

20 Sep '22

Hi list I have weird issue with my Dovecot 2.3.17.1 (476cd46418) When deleting a certain amount of messages from my INBOX via my MUA (Evolution) all over sudden dovecot starts to panic Panic: file mail-index-transaction-finish.c: line 185 (mail_index_transaction_get_uid): assertion failed: (seq <= t->view- >map->hdr.messages_count) imap(REDACTED)<24075><P0/vLkXUNt4KQmMB>: Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(backtrace_append+0x42) [0x7f09274d4142] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(backtrace_get+0x1e) [0x7f09274d424e] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xf72fe) [0x7f09274e22fe] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xf73a1) [0x7f09274e23a1] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7f0927430e38] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xf438d) [0x7f092789d38d] - > /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xf43da) [0x7f092789d3da] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(mail_index_transaction_finish+0x177) [0x7f092789da87] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xf9ad6) [0x7f09278a2ad6] - > /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(mail_index_transaction_commit_full+0x9d) [0x7f09278a2fad] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(mail_index_transaction_commit+0x1c) [0x7f09278a306c] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(mail_cache_set_seq_corrupted_reason+0x61) [0x7f092788c921] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(mail_set_mail_cache_corrupted+0xed) [0x7f09277fbbbd] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0x7a3e9) [0x7f09278233e9] - > /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0x7a6b0) [0x7f09278236b0] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(mail_get_physical_size+0x38) [0x7f09277e8ba8] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot//lib20_mail_log_plugin.so(+0x2465) [0x7f09263dd465] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot//lib15_notify_plugin.so(notify_contexts_mail_copy+ 0x5c) [0x7f09265e13ec] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot//lib15_notify_plugin.so(+0x25d4) [0x7f09265e25d4] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot//lib10_quota_plugin.so(+0x102ae) [0x7f09269f92ae] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot//lib01_acl_plugin.so(+0xef3e) [0x7f0926c10f3e] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot- storage.so.0(+0x50c4c) [0x7f09277f9c4c] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_move+0x58) [0x7f09277f9ec8] -> dovecot/imap(+0x1175b) [0x55a2c0ea575b] -> dovecot/imap(command_exec+0x64) [0x55a2c0eb3f04] -> dovecot/imap(+0x1dde2) [0x55a2c0eb1de2] -> dovecot/imap(+0x1de71) [0x55a2c0eb1e71] -> dovecot/imap(+0x1e039) [0x55a2c0eb2039] -> dovecot/imap(client_handle_input+0x205) [0x55a2c0eb22f5] -> dovecot/imap(client_input+0x79) [0x55a2c0eb28d9] imap(REDACTED)<24075><P0/vLkXUNt4KQmMB>: Fatal: master: service(imap): child 24075 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled - https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps) >From that point on ANY access to INBOX from my MUA causes the error. The only way that I found to get around is to unsubscribe the INBOX folder and subscribe again. Then the error is gone until I delete a bunch of messages again. The error only occurs if I delete the messages within short time or select multiple (about 20msg at once). If I delete them one-by-one always waiting for expunge message in dovecot logs to appear then I can delete as many as I want. I have not verified with other MUA but in Evolution I can reproduce the issue. Cheers and have a good one tobi

4 14

Unclear how to get both user and domain quotas to work
by Hans van Zijst 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Hi, First of all: my apologies for this long message. I'm trying to post all the information anybody could need to help me on my way. What I'm trying to make is an installation where both users and domains can have quotas. Ideally I would configure a quota for a domain and set a quota of 0 for all users within that domain, so that mail will be accepted up to the point where the domain quota is reached. Setting up user quota was fairly easy, there's lots of documentation around and examples to take inspiration from. Not so much for domain quota however, or I'm really bad at searching the Net. I'm running Debian Bullseye here: MariaDB 10.5.12 Dovecot 2.3.13 Postfixadmin 3.3.10 I want to use dictionaries in MySQL, because eventually this will be a platform with several Dovecot and Postfix servers. At this time I'm only running one Dovecot installation and a few Postfix servers (two for communication with the outside world and one to do the virus and spam scanning). My current setup for user quota is how Postfixadmin wants it: MariaDB [postfixadmin]> desc quota2; +----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | username | varchar(100) | NO | PRI | NULL | | | bytes | bigint(20) | NO | | 0 | | | messages | int(11) | NO | | 0 | | +----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ 3 rows in set (0.001 sec) In /etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-quota.conf I have this: plugin { quota = dict:User quota::proxy::sqlquota quota_rule = *:bytes=1024M quota_rule2 = Trash:bytes=+100M quota_vsizes = yes quota_status_success = DUNNO quota_status_nouser = DUNNO quota_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Mailbox is full" } dict { sqlquota = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } The SQL-configuration /etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext is this: connect = host=... dbname=... user=... password=... map { pattern = priv/quota/storage table = quota2 username_field = username value_field = bytes } map { pattern = priv/quota/messages table = quota2 username_field = username value_field = messages } map { pattern = shared/expire/$user/$mailbox table = expires value_field = expire_stamp fields { username = $user mailbox = $mailbox } } I use LMTP to accept mail from Postfix; the quota-plugin is activated for LMTP, so every incoming mail should be counted. This works like a charm: if I don't configure a quota for a user, he gets the default 1GB, if I override it in Postfixadmin, then that's what he gets. I'm running quota-status on a TCP-port, so the gateway SMTP-servers can connect to Dovecot for a quotacheck to decide whether to accept or reject an incoming message. Again, this works flawlessly. I can't find any serious documentation about this mapping thing. In particular, what's with that "pattern"? All I can find in the documentation is: "The dict key must match exactly priv/quota/storage. The dict keys are hardcoded in the Dovecot code, so depending on what functionality you’re configuring you need to know the available dict keys used it." -- https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/dict/#dict-sql If anyone can point me at better documentation than the actual source code: please! I browsed through the quota-plugin source code, but I'm not a programmer and couldn't find what I thought I was looking for. That said, I'm not sure where I got the third "map" from, with the shared/expire pattern. I seem to have forgotten to document that bit of my journey. Now, domain quotas... I've tried all kinds of stuff, but at the moment I'm stuck with something that seems to almost work. I added a second quota root: plugin { quota2 = dict:Domain quota:%d:proxy::sqldomainquota quota2_rule = *:bytes=1024M quota2_status_success = DUNNO quota2_status_nouser = DUNNO quota2_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Domain quota exceeded" quota2_vsizes = yes } dict { sqldomainquota = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } This dict refers to the same mapping as the one for user quotas, and I think that's the way it should be. Please correct me if I'm wrong. This creates a new user in the quota2 table, by the name of just the domain. Unfortunately, it simply fills it with the numbers from the first user it can find in that domain, not all users in that domain combined. What I think I should do, is change something in the dict so that it sums up all users in that domain, something like this: SELECT SUM(bytes) FROM quota2 WHERE username LIKE '%@domain'; Problem is that I can't find anything useful online with regards to this, I'm not even sure if I'm thinking in the right direction here. Any hints, suggestions or corrections? Or pointers to articles or documentation I might have missed? Kind regards, Hans

2 1

Dovecot ACLs and XOAUTH2
by Felix Auringer 23 Aug '22

23 Aug '22

Hi, we're trying to set up an IMAP server using Dovecot as part of a new email system in a middle-sized company (around 150 employees). We have a keycloak identity server that is used for all logins and we would also like to use it for the new email system so that the non-technical employees (the majority) will have no issues using it. It's very nice that XOAUTH2 is already included in Dovecot, it works very well with our Roundcube web client. However, it seems that other clients like Thunderbird or Android Apps like FairEmail are not easy to set up as they have their XOAUTH providers hardcoded somewhere (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1602166) Are you aware of any solution to integrate a dovecot server using XOAUTH2 into local clients (like Thunderbird)? We are currently trying to do it with passwords that can be set in Keycloak only for the purpose of email that can then be used to receive a valid token via a direct access grant but it's not a really nice solution as it introduces an additional password. Additionally, we would like to have all permission-related information saved in our identity server. For email, this includes shared mailboxes that a user is allowed to access. The ACL plugin that is used for shared mailboxes currently reads the permissions from disk which is not really feasible if the user base is large and setting these permissions should happen automatically. We are thinking the best way to do this is to encode the user's permissions in the token that dovecot receives in the login process. But as the token is only available in the authentication process and it does not seem to be intended to return such information from the password database (https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/password_databa…) we are unsure on how to process these information from the token. We did not find any plugin hooks in the authentication processes and the normal plugin hooks do not have access to information from the token anymore. What do you think is the best way to do this? We would be okay modifying some dovecot source code and contributing it back if desired. Best regards, Felix Auringer --- Gesellschaft für interkulturelles Zusammenleben gGmbH (GIZ) Felix Auringer IT Reformationsplatz 2 13597 Berlin Tel: 030/513 0100 00; Fax: 030/513 0100 09 www.giz.berlin; felix.auringer(a)giz.berlin Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 200872 B Geschäftsführerin: Dr. Britta Marschke

2 6

Is multi factor authentication practical/feasible?
by Steve Dondley 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

I have a small client whose insurance company insists they have MFA for their email to be covered under some kind of data protection policy. Currently I have the client set up on a Debian box for the email server coupled with roundcube for webmail. Most the users just use roundcube but some also use their mobile devices to check email. Maybe one person uses outlook. There’s about 5 to 10 users total. I know roundcube offers a MFA plugin. But I don’t have the foggiest idea how of an iPhone, Android device, or Outlook could all be set up to work with MFA with a standard dovecot/postfix setup. Are there any practical solutions for easily implementing MFA that could work across multiple devices?

13 21

Trivial Pigeonhole patch: allow X-Original-From header for address tests
by Rob Foehl 04 Jul '22

04 Jul '22

Motivated by more DMARC silliness, naturally. -Rob

2 2

Découvrez notre offre GitLab Hébergée et Infogérée par Bearstech
by news＠bearstech.com 28 Jun '22

28 Jun '22

Découvrez notre offre GitLab Hébergée et Infogérée par Bearstech GitLab <http://phplist.bearstech.com/lists/lt.php?tid=Tza50Ap4TD2gj9FrGpMNfI8Q2GhbL…> s'est imposé au fil des ans comme une des solutions de gestion de code la plus complète et performante, supporté par une communauté Open Source dynamique, et des dizaines de millions d'utilisateurs. Nous hébergeons et infogèrons des Gitlab <http://phplist.bearstech.com/lists/lt.php?tid=Tza50Ap4TD2gj9FrGpMNfI8Q2GhbL…> depuis 10 ans pour nos clients. Ayant développé une expertise autant en exploitation qu'en conseil pour mettre en place et améliorer des workflows de déploiement complexes, nous avons décidé de proposer une offre simple et capable d'évoluer en fonction du dimensionnement de vos projets. Cette offre GitLab <http://phplist.bearstech.com/lists/lt.php?tid=Tza50Ap4TD2gj9FrGpMNfI8Q2GhbL…> est hébergée sur notre propre infrastructure, localisée en France. Nous offrons un niveau de support et une qualité de service irréprochable, avec une disponibilité garantie de 99.9%. Nous assurons un service d'astreinte 24h/7j/365. Les serveurs étant infogérés par Bearstech, la sécurité et la fiabilité de votre forge répondent ainsi aux plus hauts standards du métier. Au lieu d'un coût par utilisateur, nous vous proposons un prix mensuel correspondant aux ressources matérielles et à vos usages, votre budget est donc maitrisé et prévisible, le coût par utilisateur étant rapidement moins cher que sur l'offre Gitlab.com. Votre garantie, un support personnalisé, avec des experts capables de vous apporter des retours d'expérience précieux et améliorer continuellement votre démarche DevOps. Découvrez notre offre Gitlab Hébergée et infogérée par Bearstech <http://phplist.bearstech.com/lists/lt.php?tid=Tza50Ap4TD2gj9FrGpMNfI8Q2GhbL…>

1 0

Doveadm http requests - payload size
by Tony Hartmann - WebBoty 22 Jun '22

22 Jun '22

Hello Team, We are running dovecot version (2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b)) on ubuntu 20.04. Using the doveadm tool via http api we can create emails and move them accordingly to the draft folder by sending http requests via cURL from another server. We can even attach files. However once we create a http API request bigger than 1MB in size we get the “PAYLOAD TO LARGE” response from dovecot. Going through the config I see no option to increase the allowed payload size for doveadm http api requests. However in the source code itself I see that there is a default limit/size of: #define HTTP_REQUEST_DEFAULT_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE (1 * 1024 * 1024) Further I found out that the default is only used if no limit is provided: === if (limits != NULL) { hdr_limits = limits->header; max_payload_size = limits->max_payload_size; } else { i_zero(&hdr_limits); max_payload_size = 0; } /* substitute default limits */ if (parser->max_target_length == 0) parser->max_target_length = HTTP_REQUEST_DEFAULT_MAX_TARGET_LENGTH; if (hdr_limits.max_size == 0) hdr_limits.max_size = HTTP_REQUEST_DEFAULT_MAX_HEADER_SIZE; if (hdr_limits.max_field_size == 0) hdr_limits.max_field_size = HTTP_REQUEST_DEFAULT_MAX_HEADER_FIELD_SIZE; if (hdr_limits.max_fields == 0) hdr_limits.max_fields = HTTP_REQUEST_DEFAULT_MAX_HEADER_FIELDS; if (max_payload_size == 0) max_payload_size = HTTP_REQUEST_DEFAULT_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE; if ((flags & HTTP_REQUEST_PARSE_FLAG_STRICT) != 0) msg_flags |= HTTP_MESSAGE_PARSE_FLAG_STRICT; http_message_parser_init(&parser->parser, input, &hdr_limits, max_payload_size, msg_flags); return parser; The question arises … how can we change / set the allowed payload size for the doveadm http api, so we can store bigger emails and attachments? Can we store the desired allowed payload size in an env file somewhere or are there any options to take control of the allowed payload size without changing the source code? Thanks in advance Tony

1 0

running alternate dovecot instances on the same server
by Chris Hoogendyk 22 Jun '22

22 Jun '22

I'm posting to the list, but not on the list. I presume that means a reply-all to get to me as well as the list? We have two servers (dovecot --version: 2.2.22 (fe789d2)) that handle email for two different departments. We are transitioning mail service to the University central IT. They need to move accounts in an automated fashion and therefore need a master password to our dovecot servers. However, we are running with LDAP authentication, and I understand that a master password is not possible in that configuration. Would it be possible to run an alternate dovecot process that would use local account authentication, have a master password, and use an alternate port for connecting? Ideally it would only read accounts without changing anything, and would not interfere with the operation of the other dovecot process. I'm hoping that I could copy the configuration files, make these changes, and then launch it manually without any startup scripts in /etc/inetd.conf. Oh, by the way, we are running Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and have contracts with Ubuntu Advantage for ongoing patch support. The dovecot version is from the distribution, installed with aptitude. -- --------------- Chris Hoogendyk - O__ ---- Systems Administrator, Retired c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geosciences Departments (*) \(*) -- 315 Morrill Science Center III ~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst <hoogendyk(a)bio.umass.edu> --------------- Erdös 4

3 7

dovecot and openssl3
by A. Schulze 21 Jun '22

21 Jun '22

Hello, I tried to build dovecot-2.3.19.1 with openssl-3.0.2 "make test" failed. Good, the test-suite found a problem! I found similar reports and patches: - https://sources.debian.org/src/dovecot/1%3A2.3.19%2Bdfsg1-1/debian/patches/… - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962035 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1945763 - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/569387479/dovecot.debdiff The patch looks easy and at least 'make test' pass again. Could the dovecot developer have a look at the patch and say something about the roadmap to support openssl3? Thanks Andreas

1 0