July 2024 - dovecot - dovecot.org

sieve crashes when two optional include scripts are missing
by Michal Hlavinka 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi, we've found an issue with sieve plugin. When script includes two missing optional scripts, it causes crash. For reproducing the issue, script names must belong to same hash table node, so either two scripts with same name or scripts where 'hash(name) % table->size' results in same value, like missing_a and missing_aa in reproducer below. Reduced reproducer: cat >dovecot.min.conf <<EOF mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir plugin { sieve = file:/tmp;active=/tmp/dovecot.sieve } EOF cat >reproducer.sieve <<EOF require "include"; include :personal :optional "missing_a"; include :personal :optional "missing_aa"; EOF echo -n > empty sieve-test -c dovecot.min.conf reproducer.sieve empty any test mail would do, but empty file is enough for reproducer # return sblock->id causes the crash as sblock is NULL backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 sieve_binary_block_get_id (sblock=0x0) at src/lib-sieve/sieve-binary.c:421 #1 ext_include_execute_include (renv=0x5555555bbed8, include_id=1, flags=EXT_INCLUDE_FLAG_OPTIONAL) at plugins/include/ext-include-common.c:696 #2 opc_include_execute (renv=0x5555555bbed8, address=0x5555555bbf10) at plugins/include/cmd-include.c:399 #3 sieve_interpreter_operation_execute (interp=0x5555555bbe88) at src/lib-sieve/sieve-interpreter.c:901 #4 sieve_interpreter_continue (interp=0x5555555bbe88, interrupted=0x0) at src/lib-sieve/sieve-interpreter.c:959 #5 sieve_interpreter_start (interp=0x5555555bbe88, result=0x5555555b9230, interrupted=0x0) at src/lib-sieve/sieve-interpreter.c:1049 #6 sieve_interpreter_run (interp=0x5555555bbe88, result=0x5555555b9230) at src/lib-sieve/sieve-interpreter.c:1057 #7 sieve_run (sbin=0x55555558ee18, result=0x5555555b9230, eenv=0x7fffffffe890, ehandler=0x55555558c338) at src/lib-sieve/sieve.c:357 #8 sieve_test (sbin=0x55555558ee18, msgdata=0x7fffffffe9f0, senv=0x7fffffffea30, ehandler=0x55555558c338, stream=0x5555555b2cd0, flags=SIEVE_EXECUTE_FLAG_LOG_RESULT) at src/lib-sieve/sieve.c:598 #9 main (argc=5, argv=0x555555567a10) at src/sieve-tools/sieve-test.c:391 issue seems to be caused by lib-sieve/plugins/include/ext-include-common.c: ext_include_generate_include on first pass (script) the check for script already compiled into binary at 529: included = ext_include_binary_script_get_include_info(binctx, script); returns NULL, so code goes through 'else' block where it hits sieve_script_is_open(script) check. It includes script with NULL block, returns 0 so caller cmd_include_generate does not emit anything. On second pass the above 'included' check returns first missing script, it goes through true block where it just checks flags and returns non-zero, so caller this time goes through the emit code block and the previously included NULL sblock gets referenced causing crash later. Note: despite scripts have different name, they pass the "same script" check because sieve_file_script_equals compares 0==0 dev & inode numbers as scripts do not exist. This is why scripts do not have to have same names. Side effect of this is that as missing_a and missing_aa are treated like the same script, only first one is linked in compiled svbin. Which means that if missing_aa reappears later, svbin won't get recompiled. Another manifestation of the issue is when included missing_a script is present when main script is compiled and later missina_a is removed again. During execution, script is not recompiled and it aborts for hash table dupe check: sieve_binary_open->ext_include_binary_script_include->hash_table_insert There are several ways how to solve this. I've tried a few, but there were other corner cases that appeared. One tried way was for example ext_include_generate_include in the 'if (included)' replicate the check sieve_script_is_open(...) from else block, just check flags, no include and set result to 0. Another way to solve this is to return from ext_include_execute_include early if sblock is NULL just before it tries to derefernce it, similarly as it does if it fails 'once' check. Same for dumping in opc_include_dump. Whilst the first approach seems a bit better, it won't stop crashing in existing environments as it won't trigger svbin recompilation and svbin would fail. This means that the second soultion is sort of needed anyway. This still won't solve the problem with different missing scripts as only first one would be able to trigger recompilation when file becomes available. Just including both in the mentioned function won't work either as they would still be evaluated as same and hash table anti-dupe check would trigger abort. So some changes in script comparison seem needed anyway. This is what I've used in my approach. Return early from ext_include_execute_include and opc_include_dump if sblock is NULL and change sieve_file_script_equals to compare also script->location for missing scripts (when inode is 0). Let me know if you need more information. Cheers, Michal Hlavinka

2 1

Uppercase username emails are rejected
by lua8ds＠proton.me 20 Oct '24

20 Oct '24

When a sender writes my email address with my username uppercase, e.g. USERNAME(a)name.com, in the to: field of their MUA, my mail server rejects that email. /var/log/mail.log prints: <USERNAME(a)redacted.com>: host mail.redacted.com[private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 550 5.1.1 > <USERNAME(a)redacted.com> User doesn't exist: USERNAME(a)redacted.com (in reply to RCPT TO > command) In the manual, I found that: auth_username_format Default: %Lu Formatting applied to username before querying the auth database. You can use the standard variables here. Examples: %Lu Lowercases the username [...] My current setting was not the default; I had: auth_username_format = %n So I updated that setting to: auth_username_format = %Lu expecting that %Lu would lowercase the username - and that my problem would be fixed. It does not though. Updating this setting not only prompts my email server to still reject USERNAME(a)redacted.com, but now also rejects (lowercase username) username(a)redacted.com (which my server had no issue receiving beforehand). So I reverted auth_username_format to: auth_username_format = %n Emails sent to username(a)redacted.com land in my mailbox again - but emails sent to USERNAME(a)redacted.com still don't. What can I try to troubleshoot? Which config file shall I share with you?

10 22

dsync with vurtial folder leads to mess of msg ID
by Kirill A. Korinsky 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

Greetings, I have a setup with two dovecot servers and dsync replication between them. On both of them I have a virtual folders, forexample All with config: mx1# cat /etc/dovecot/virtual/All/dovecot-virtual * -Trash -Trash/* -Junk -Junk/* all All virtual folders are excluded from replication because it leads to broken replication with errors like: virtual.All can't be created. So, I have. replication_dsync_parameters = -d -l 30 -U -x virtual. Unfortently, after a couple of weeks I've noticed that msg id for the same message on the different servers aren't match. For example: mx1# doveadm fetch -u kirill(a)korins.ky 'uid' mailbox virtual.All header Message-ID 'macports/macports-ports/pull/22284/c1901369454(a)github.com' uid: 157786 mx1# doveadm fetch -u kirill(a)korins.ky 'uid' mailbox INBOX header Message-ID 'macports/macports-ports/pull/22284/c1901369454(a)github.com' uid: 5561 mx1# vs mx2# doveadm fetch -u kirill(a)korins.ky 'uid' mailbox virtual.All header Message-ID 'macports/macports-ports/pull/22284/c1901369454(a)github.com' uid: 157766 mx2# doveadm fetch -u kirill(a)korins.ky 'uid' mailbox INBOX header Message-ID 'macports/macports-ports/pull/22284/c1901369454(a)github.com' uid: 5561 mx2# as you may see msgid at INBOX are matched, but it isn't true for virtual.All, here 157786 vs 157766 So, here the question: how can I sync msg id inside virtual folder on this setup? -- wbr, Kirill

2 18

Pay Someone to Take My Online Course?
by xotawa2329＠hapincy.com 17 Sep '24

17 Sep '24

Pay Someone to Take My Online Course? Different understudies who battle with reworking school, work, and family obligations select online class tutors to assist them with finishing their tests and complete their coursework. In any case, some solicitation the ethicality of this planning. While <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4040-assessment-4-attempt-1-inform…">NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4</a>  has every one of the reserves of being enticing, it goes with two or three serious dangers. This article will examine a piece of the things you ought to remember going before enlisting an online class help association. It's clearly a fact that online classes can be truly troublesome, particularly for working professionals who have a clamoring plan. Oftentimes they are searching for someone to take a whole course or individual tasks for them, to assist with managing their grades and moderate their strain. Nonetheless, be wary of affiliations that guarantee too wonderful to be authentic. They could charge you enormous totals for their associations and end up not conveying. The best technique for guaranteeing that you are getting anything that would be fair is to use an online class tutor who offers an inadequate responsibility. Additionally, review that different schools consider paying someone to take an online class to swindle. Therefore, whenever got, you could go facing silly outcomes like besieging the course, scholarly suspension or even send off. To this end picking a fair relationship with a showed history is crucial. The association is clear: present your mentioning and survey offers from qualified educated authorities. Then enlist the one that is reasonable for yourself and store maintains in <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4050-assessment-1-attempt-3-prelim…">NURS FPX 4050 Assessment 1</a>  scrow until your assignment is finished. Online classes are eminent among understudies who need to save time on education and spotlight more on work or other private issues. These merge understudies who are taking courses while working and attempting to change family and profession responsibilities, military understudies on sending, and understudies with genuine inadequacies or sickness that make it pursuing for them to go to classes. Unfortunately, there are many tricks that confirmation to take online courses for you. These affiliations charge ridiculous totals and don't complete their obligations. They may also hand you over to your school. Tolerating that they do, you could be killed from your underwriting project or even suspended or removed from school. This isn't the very thing that you truly need for your business and future. Therefore, you genuinely need to track down serious areas of strength for a that offers a fair cost and mind blowing results. To this end you ought to search for a <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4050-assessment-2-attempt-1-ethica…">NURS FPX 4050 Assessment 2</a>  affiliation that has an inadequate responsibility and splendid customer association. Various individuals decide to use a professional to take their online class since they need the opportunity to go to it very close. They could be working the whole day, supervising family issues, or fighting disease and disappointments that log jam their review tendencies. These professionals can assist you with fulfilling time necessities, stay away from imaginative theft, and set free your nights to zero in on work or other unwinding works out. They may comparatively have the decision to help you with beating any learning handicaps you have. Copyright infringement suggests utilizing someone else's words and thoughts without their endorsement. It is viewed as a kind of cheating and can accomplish a delicate grade or even send off from school. It is difficult to ensure that a used professional won't phony. This is on the grounds that educational foundations don't have <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4900-assessment-1-assessing-the-pr…">NURS FPX 4900 Assessment 1 Assessing the Problem</a>  assets for check whether understudies are authentic or not. This truly expects that tolerant you are gotten, you will probably lose the cash you paid to have someone take your class. There's no veritable strategy for remaining caution assuming the solitary you enroll to take your online course will tell the truth and dependable. They probably won't be in a tantamount state as you. Moreover, they apparently won't be as dedicated to finishing the class for you as you are. They may very well be doing the base extent of work expected to get reviewed and a brief time frame later vanish. MORE <a href="https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/website/-/issues/35#note_211778">Facebook is a powerful tool for business</a> <a href="https://xtremepape.rs/members/horridhenry7860.397211/about">Mobile Application Development Services</a> <a href="https://xtremepape.rs/members/samfarrid4563.397213/about">best digital marketing agencies</a>

4 3

Re: Dovecot authentication hangs when ldap_start_tls_s() fails for invalid certificate
by Aki Tuomi 04 Sep '24

04 Sep '24

> On 19/11/2020 12:55 sebastiano degan <sebastiano.degan(a)frigoveneta.it> wrote: > > > On a Debian10 I've installed postfix 3.4.14 and dovecot 2.3.4.1. > I've configured multiple passdb sources and I expect that if one fails > the other ones are tested. > This is usually the case, except when the failure is due to an invalid > certificate from the ldap server. > In that case all authentication attempts from that moment on will fail. Hi! Can you try with latest CE release from https://repo.dovecot.org/ Regards, Aki

2 1

Debug: open(/proc/self/io) failed: Permission denied
by Alex 31 Aug '24

31 Aug '24

Hi, I've seen a few emails over the years related to this error message, but they are typically associated with doveadm. In my case, it's related to dovecot itself. I've just set up dovecot-2.3.20-1.fc37.x86_64 on fedora37 and unable to receive mail. The main config was copied over from another dovecot system on fedora37 with virtually identical settings, including the same SSL cert. I've also tried to just migrate the important stuff and otherwise leave the defaults, but I'm having the same problem. imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib64/dovecot imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: Module loaded: /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib20_listescape_plugin.so imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: Effective uid=1001, gid=1001, home=/home/bcc-user imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: open(/proc/self/io) failed: Permission denied imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: Namespace inbox: type=private, prefix=, sep=, inbox=yes, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes location=mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/bcc-user imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: fs: root=/home/bcc-user/mail, index=, indexpvt=, control=, inbox=/var/spool/mail/bcc-user, alt= imap(bcc-user)<2977522><rappeBf6vLZEw8Eq>: Debug: Mailbox Trash: Mailbox opened I've set the /var/spool/mail/bcc-user permissions to 600, bcc-user:mail. The /home/bcc-user directory is 611, bcc-user:bcc-user. Here is my doveconf -n: # 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.20 (149edcf2) # OS: Linux 6.1.15-200.fc37.x86_64 x86_64 Fedora release 37 (Thirty Seven) auth_debug = yes auth_verbose = yes mail_debug = yes mail_gid = mail mail_home = mail/ mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u mail_max_userip_connections = 500 mail_plugins = " listescape" mail_privileged_group = mail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext mbox_write_locks = fcntl namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { driver = pam } protocols = imap service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 0 } inet_listener imaps { port = 993 } process_min_avail = 6 service_count = 0 vsz_limit = 512 M } ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/fullchain.cer ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!EXP:!aNULL:!RC4::!eNULL:!LOW:!3DES:!MD5:!EXP:!PSK:!SRP:!DSS ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes userdb { driver = passwd } verbose_ssl = yes Any ideas greatly appreciated. I was very surprised to be having problems after having done this so many times before.

3 5

dovecot-indexer writting as root
by Joan Moreau 20 Aug '24

20 Aug '24

Hi I have that issue times to times Full case described properly here : https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/168 Can you help understand the root cause of that ? THank you

3 6

SQL Multiple passwords
by Aubry 19 Aug '24

19 Aug '24

Hi, From what I understood from the archive and from my tests, we cannot have multiple passwords for a given account. (I get the error: Password query returned multiple matches) But it looks like it can be done via a PAM module. Does anyone succeeded setup multiple password with PAM or any other method with a SQL backend ? Regards, Aubry

6 7

dovecot-2.3.2.1 and dovecot-pigeonhole-0.5.2 bug?
by Jan Nowak 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hello, we have a problem after updating the software with the operation of sieve scripts sending a copy of the e-mails, e-mails are not transferred. Configuration: dovecot-2.3.2.1 + dovecot-pigeonhole-0.5.2 + FreeBSD 11.2 log: Sep 06 13:28:17 lda(XXX@XXX)<38615><XXX+XXX>: Info: sieve: msgid=<XXX-XXX-XXX-7788-XXX@XXXXnet>: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' Sep 06 13:28:17 lda(XXX@XXX)<38615><XXX+XXX>: Info: sieve: Execution of script /usr/home/XXX/mail/XXX(a)XXX/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /usr/home/XXX/mail/XXX(a)XXX/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) .dovecot.sieve.log: error: msgid=<XXX-XXX-XXX-7788-XXX@XXXXnet>: failed to redirect message to <XXXXX(a)XXXXXX.com>: smtp(127.0.0.1:25): DATA failed: 552 Message header not CRLF terminated (permanent failure). On old configuration: dovecot 2.2 + dovecot-pigeonhole- 0.4 + FreeBSD 11.2 we don't have problem. Has anyone had a similar problem, knows the solution?

5 12

The future of SIS
by Sebastian Marsching 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, I am currently in the process of planning a new deployment of Dovecot. I was planning to use mdbox or sdbox with “mail_attachment_fs = sis posix”, but I stumbled across the following notice in the documentation for Dovecot 3.0 (https://doc.dovecot.org/3.0/settings/core/#core_setting-mail_attachment_fs) > Changed in version 2.4.0 (CE): SIS is deprecated and writing of SIS files is disabled. Reading is supported for now, any missing SIS attachments are replaced with files filled with spaces. > > Changed in version 3.0.0 (Pro): SIS is deprecated and writing of SIS files is disabled. Reading is supported for now, any missing SIS attachments are replaced with files filled with spaces. And https://doc.dovecot.org/3.0/installation_guide/upgrading/from-2.3-to-3.0/ says: > Saving new mails’ attachments via fs-sis is disabled, but reading SIS attachments is still supported. Missing SIS attachments are replaced with files filled with spaces. What is not entirely clear from this comment is whether this only applied to “sis posix” or also to “sis-queue posix”. Does anybody whether sis-queue is also affected by this? I saw that the notice was added to the dovecot/documentation Git repository in April 2023, but I couldn’t find any further information there or the main branch of the dovecot/core repository. Maybe, the code for 2.4 / 3.0 has not made it into that branch or repository yet. SIS sounds like a neat concept and I would like to use it, but obviously I do not want to use a soon-to-be-deprecated feature in a completely new deployment. So, does anybody know an alternative solution for attachment deduplication (except file-system level deduplication)? Thanks, Sebastian

19 43