February 2026 - dovecot

2.3 replication issue throwing errors
by Paul Kudla 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

shows same error on both servers Server 1 : # sync faye(a)scom.ca doveadm(faye(a)scom.ca)<90952><BJq9J2dHmGlIYwEA0dxyZQ>: Warning: Mailbox changes caused a desync. You may want to run dsync again: Remote lost mailbox GUID f982a82747469869ea0f0100cf58dcff (maybe it was just deleted?) Server 2: # sync faye(a)scom.ca doveadm(faye(a)scom.ca)<90952><BJq9J2dHmGlIYwEA0dxyZQ>: Warning: Mailbox changes caused a desync. You may want to run dsync again: Remote lost mailbox GUID f982a82747469869ea0f0100cf58dcff (maybe it was just deleted?) i am aware there is a mismatch on one of the servers but there does not seem to be a clear cut way to find the offending file to delete it or force a backwards sync ? How would i identify what GUID f982a82747469869ea0f0100cf58dcff means? same on both servers. doveadm force-resync -u faye(a)scom.ca '*' have tried reindex etc etc etc issue persists logs ?? mail18 02-20 06:45:24 {dovecot} [67632] (3014654310) doveadm(faye(a)scom.ca)<71073><hOl0ClRJmGmhFQEAz1jc/w>: Debug: open(/proc/self/stat) failed: No such file or directory mail18 02-20 06:45:24 {dovecot} [67632] (3014654311) doveadm(faye(a)scom.ca)<71073><hOl0ClRJmGmhFQEAz1jc/w>: Debug: open(/proc/self/io) failed: No such file or directory mail18 02-20 06:45:24 {dovecot} [67632] (3014654312) doveadm(faye(a)scom.ca)<71073><hOl0ClRJmGmhFQEAz1jc/w>: Debug: Namespace inbox: type=private, prefix=, sep=/, inbox=yes, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes location=maildir:~/ any help would be appreciated -- Thanks - Paul Kudla (Manager SCOM.CA Internet Services Inc.) Have A Happy Friday AND Happy Sucessful 2026 ! Scom.ca Internet Services <http://www.scom.ca> 104-1009 Byron Street South Whitby, Ontario - Canada L1N 4S3 Toronto 416.642.7266 Main 1.866.411.7266 Fax 1.888.892.7266 Email paul(a)scom.ca

2 1

How to declare port 143
by Steve Litt 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

Hi all, I have Dovecot 2.4.2 working (plain text only) on my Qemu virtual machine, with Claws-Mail able to work with all its files. However, I want to declare the Dovecot server as running on Port 143, and when I do, I dovecot -F throws the error message shown later in this message. If I comment out the explicit port declaration, it works fine, and I want to know why. To the best of my knowledge, my declaration of port 143 exactly matches your 2.4.2 documentation: The following is my attempt to tell Dovecot to serve *explicitly* at port 143: =============================================== # My Dovecot server will operate on Localhost listen = 127.0.0.1 service imap { inet_listener imap-login { port = 143 } # inet_listener imaps { # port = 993 # ssl = yes # } } =============================================== The following is the result: =============================================== [root@dovecotvoid ~]# dovecot -F doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: duplicate listener: 143:127.0.0.1 [root@dovecotvoid ~]# =============================================== If I comment out the port = 143, it works. Why is it griping about a duplicate listener? At the bottom of this email is the entire dovecot.conf and the result of dovecot -n, and there are no sub-configuration files in conf.d : =============================================== # Start new configs with the latest Dovecot version numbers here: dovecot_config_version = 2.4.2 # Must be current version dovecot_storage_version = 2.4.2 # Must be current version or earlier # 2.3 is minimum # I only want imap protocols { imap = yes lmtp = no pop3 = no } # My Dovecot server will operate on Localhost listen = 127.0.0.1 service imap { inet_listener imap-login { port = 143 } # inet_listener imaps { # port = 993 # ssl = yes # } } # mail_home is only for virtual users # A virtual user is a user with no system account # I have no virtual users, so I've commented out mail_home. #mail_home = /srv/mail/%{user} # mail_driver is the storage format mail_driver = maildir # mail_path is location of top of storage data # WARNING: For troubleshooting be prepared to switch # to literal location of ~ mail_path = ~/mail/Maildir # In my case # mail_home is the home directory of the user identified as ~ # WARNING: system users have no ~ without it. mail_home = /home/slitt # You need a log you can locate # There might not be a log_path=/var/log/dovecot.log #mail_uid = slitt #mail_gid = slitt mail_uid = vmail mail_gid = vmail # By default first_valid_uid is 500. #If your vmail user's UID is smaller, # you need to modify this: #first_valid_uid = uid-number-of-vmail-user namespace inbox { inbox = yes separator = / } # Authenticate as system users: passdb pam { driver = pam #driver = passwd } userdb passwd { driver = passwd } #ssl_server_cert_file = /etc/dovecot/ssl-cert.pem #ssl_server_key_file = /etc/dovecot/ssl-key.pem =============================================== The following is the output of dovecot -n: =============================================== # 2.4.2 (0962ed2104): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 6.12.71_1 x86_64 # Hostname: dovecotvoid dovecot_config_version = 2.4.2 dovecot_storage_version = 2.4.2 listen = 127.0.0.1 log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_driver = maildir mail_gid = vmail mail_home = /home/slitt mail_path = ~/mail/Maildir mail_uid = vmail protocols { imap = yes lmtp = no pop3 = no } service imap { inet_listener imap-login { port = 143 } } namespace inbox { inbox = yes separator = / } passdb pam { driver = pam } userdb passwd { driver = passwd } ===============================================

4 4

How do you use doveadm fetch -S
by Steve Litt 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

Hi all, I have a working plain text 127.0.0.1:143 Dovecot 2.4.2 on my Qemu VM guest. The following command displays the Receive date, From and Subject for every email in my golugTech mailbox, exactly like the docs say it should: =================================================== doveadm fetch -u slitt "date.received hdr.from hdr.subject" mailbox golugTech =================================================== But when I add the -S in order to specify the 127.0.0.1 listener at port 143, it throws the following error: =================================================== [slitt@mydesk ~]$ cat junk.jnk [root@dovecotvoid dovecot]# doveadm fetch -S 127.0.0.1:143 -u slitt "date.received hdr.from hdr.subject" mailbox golugTech doveadm(slitt): Error: conn 127.0.0.1:143 (127.0.0.1:143): doveadm server sent invalid handshake: * OK Waiting for authentication process to respond.. doveadm(slitt): Error: cmd fetch: 127.0.0.1:143: Command fetch failed for slitt: Connection closed [root@dovecotvoid dovecot]# [slitt@mydesk~]$ =================================================== The docs say -S is to specify the socket_path, and it should be expressed as hostname:port. For hostname, besides 127.0.0.1, I tried localhost and dovecotvoid, the latter of which should not work because dovecotvoid is not 127.0.0.1, it's 10.0.2.15. The docs say "This allows an administrator to execute doveadm(1) mail commands through the given socket." So I guess finding the server isn't the purpose of socket_path. My plain text 143 Dovecot 2.4.2 IMAP works just fine without the -S. Is there ever a case where doveadm fetch would need to know the specific address and port of the dovecot IMAP server, and if so, how would I specify it? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt http://444domains.com

2 1

What replaced mail_home in 2.4.2?
by Steve Litt 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

Hi all, In my Dovecot 2.4.2 virtual machine guest I've used mail_home to indicate the value of ~ and presumably of ${home}. However, the only documentation I can find on mail_home is on https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/summaries/settings.html#mail_home , which is NOT a 2.4.2 document. I find no reference to mail_home on any 2.4.2 documentation. Has something replace mail_home, and if so what's it called and can I put it outside of any {} blocks? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt http://444domains.com

2 2

[Pigeonhole] extracttext on "message/rfc822" attachment ignores included headers
by quentinduchemin＠tuta.io 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

Hi everyone! I'm not sure this is a design decision, a bug, something not implemented or malformed input on my side. My use case is the following: users that forward their mails outside the domain I manage have the option to report spam as attachment so the spam classifier can learn anyway. I prefer attachment over forward because MUAs have their own way to do it and it's difficult to reliably reconstruct some headers/email structure that can be important for the spam classifier. Each input message is processed through a Sieve extensions of RFC 5703 to extract the attachment. I ask user to produce a file with .eml extension through any export-like feature of their MUA. Below is an example EML file produced by Tuta (Thunderbird does a similar thing with a different encoding for the body). I'll use a bunch of = characters as a separator in the rest of this. =============================================== [...bunch of header...] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000000000 00 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: TYSPR04MB7035 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota" --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTogQXB0b3MsIEFwdG9zX0VtYmVkZGVkRm9udCwgQXB0b3 NfTVNGb250U2VydmljZSwgQ2FsaWJyaSwgSGVsdmV0aWNhLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmOyBmb250LXNpemU6 [...base64 encoding of the body...] =============================================== While attached and sent, the received messaged looks like this: =============================================== [...headers of the actual email...] X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------5jyKrhQ08xXUif7LHhgg648N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------5jyKrhQ08xXUif7LHhgg648N Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="a.eml" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="a.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [...headers of the spam....] Subject: Re: //Re: AI + Ranking /// Thread-Topic: //Re: AI + Ranking /// [....] Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota" --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTogQXB0b3MsIEFwdG9zX0VtYmVkZGVkRm9udCwgQXB0b3 NfTVNGb250U2VydmljZSwgQ2FsaWJyaSwgSGVsdmV0aWNhLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmOyBmb250LXNpemU6 [...base64 encoding of the spam....] --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota-- --------------5jyKrhQ08xXUif7LHhgg648N-- =============================================== I face two issues: 1. Only the base64 decoded string can be retrived through foreverypart/extracttext; 2. It has a lot of newlines. - 2. is not a big deal. The original spam has a lot of HTML junk, and each line with HTML without an inner text node is stripped, but the newline is kept. I don't know if this is intended. - 1. is more of a big deal. To try to confirm that, I made an over-simplified version of the Sieve script (I skip configuration but plugins are loaded etc, please ask if useful). =============================================== [...require...] foreverypart { extracttext "eml"; debug_log "PART ============================== ${eml}"; } =============================================== mail_debug is activated. In the logs, I can read: =============================================== Info: sieve: DEBUG: PART ============================== Info: sieve: DEBUG: PART ============================== Info: sieve: DEBUG: PART ============================== Info: sieve: DEBUG: PART ============================== Info: sieve: DEBUG: PART ============================== Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Hello, Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Hope you're doing well. Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Info: sieve: Would you like attract more traffic with our AEO + GEO + SEO services. AI-driven search is here—don’t miss out. =============================================== So multiple parts are analyzed but only the last gives something. The RFC says that "If the transfer encoding or character set is unrecognized by the implementation or recognized but invalid, an empty string will result.". But it's over my knowledge. I activated trace for Sieve with "matching" level, and the file looks like (this is another test but was the same result): =============================================== Sieve trace log for message delivery: Username: REDACTED Session ID: ozNMOEPNl2nlAAAAO14Lzw Sender: REDACTED Final recipient: REDACTED Default mailbox: INBOX ## Started executing script 'move-spam' 33: foreverypart loop begin 33: loop ends at line 36 35: extracttext command 36: assign 'eml' [0] = "" 36: debug_log "PART ============================== " 36: foreverypart loop end 36: switched to next message part 36: looping back to line 35 35: extracttext command 36: assign 'eml' [0] = "" 36: debug_log "PART ============================== " 36: foreverypart loop end 36: switched to next message part 36: looping back to line 35 35: extracttext command 36: assign 'eml' [0] = "" 36: debug_log "PART ============================== " 36: foreverypart loop end 36: switched to next message part 36: looping back to line 35 35: extracttext command 36: assign 'eml' [0] = "" 36: debug_log "PART ============================== " 36: foreverypart loop end 36: switched to next message part 36: looping back to line 35 35: extracttext command 36: assign 'eml' [0] = "Hi, Just checking in to see if you had a chance to review my earlier message. [...body spam....] 36: debug_log "PART ============================== ????????????Hi, ?? ??Just checking in t..." 36: foreverypart loop end 36: no more message parts 36: exiting loops at line 36 ## Finished executing script 'move-spam' =============================================== Hypothesis: A. Could it be because the mail headers are indistinguishable from the part headers? B. Or is it related to Pigeonhole not implementing yet the enclose extension, which do this the other way? I hope this message is not too hard to read with all the code/logs. Please tell me if there is a better way of doing it. And thanks in advance for any help, because I don't really know what to do and trying to take a (superficial) look at the Pigeonhole code didn't helped.

1 1

mail_utf8_extensions and IMAP Folder Naming
by max.wriedt＠rehost.eu 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

i just upgraded my 2.3 installation to 2.4. I like to be bleeding edge and i want to use SMTPUTF8. I came across problems with mailboxes that have german umlauts. when enabling "mail_utf8_extensions=yes" e.g. Microsoft Outlook gives me mUTF-7 encoded folder names. Also the folder names when list via openssl s_client are encoded in mUTF-7. Am i missing something or can i disable utf8 for IMAP (UTF8=ACCEPT) only, but keep for LMTP Transport/SMTPUTF8 from postfix to dovecot? I am using mdbox format as storage, if that matters. My namespace config (shortened): namespace inbox { inbox = yes type = private #mailbox_list_utf8 = yes # also tried this -> when folder didn't exist before it would create a new one with utf8, no matter mail_utf8_extensions is on or off mailbox Drafts { auto = no special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Entw&APw-rfe { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Entw%26APw-rfe { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Entw\&APw-rfe { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Entwürfe { auto = create special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Trash { auto = no special_use = \Trash quota_storage_percentage = 110 } mailbox "Gel&APY-schte Elemente" { special_use = \Trash quota_storage_percentage = 110 } mailbox "Gelöschte Elemente" { auto = subscribe special_use = \Trash quota_storage_percentage = 110 } mailbox Sent { auto = no special_use = \Sent } mailbox Archiv { auto = subscribe special_use = \Archive } mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } }

3 4

2.4.2 breaks user iterations for LDAP
by cpfeiffer＠rev-crew.info 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

Hello everyone, Due to the fix for CVE-2025-30189, routines like userdb_ldap_preinit() call auth_cache_parse_key_and_fields() unconditionally, with the eventually called auth_cache_parse_key_exclude() erroring if a cache key could not be constructed. It’s also noteworthy that this call happens regardless of whether use_cache is set or not, and as of such failing to construct a cache key would cause an error even if use_cache = no was set for that database. This is however an issue for user iteration with LDAP, as documented here LDAP | Dovecot CE <https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.2/core/config/auth/databases/ldap.html#user-ite…> . Such a userdb only has iterate_filter fields that would inherently not be containing any user variables. The call to auth_cache_parse_key_and_fields() uses a combination of ldap_base and userdb_ldap_filter anyway (so whatever is in iterate_filter isn’t considered), and for an iteration userdb as described in the documentation, the latter would be empty. Alas, I ended up getting the rather confusing error * auth: Fatal: auth-cache: dc=rev-crew,dc=info: Cache key must contain at least one variable With dc=rev-crew,dc=info being my ldap_base setting for the iteration userdb. I’m not critically dependent on the user iteration, so I’ve commented the userdb out for now, but this would need fixing. Regards, Christian Pfeiffer Hello everyone, Due to the fix for CVE-2025-30189, routines like userdb_ldap_preinit() call auth_cache_parse_key_and_fields() unconditionally, with the eventually called auth_cache_parse_key_exclude() erroring if a cache key could not be constructed. It's also noteworthy that this call happens regardless of whether use_cache is set or not, and as of such failing to construct a cache key would cause an error even if use_cache = no was set for that database. This is however an issue for user iteration with LDAP, as documented here [1]LDAP | Dovecot CE. Such a userdb only has iterate_filter fields that would inherently not be containing any user variables. The call to auth_cache_parse_key_and_fields() uses a combination of ldap_base and userdb_ldap_filter anyway (so whatever is in iterate_filter isn't considered), and for an iteration userdb as described in the documentation, the latter would be empty. Alas, I ended up getting the rather confusing error o auth: Fatal: auth-cache: dc=rev-crew,dc=info: Cache key must contain at least one variable With dc=rev-crew,dc=info being my ldap_base setting for the iteration userdb. I'm not critically dependent on the user iteration, so I've commented the userdb out for now, but this would need fixing. Regards, Christian Pfeiffer References Visible links 1. https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.2/core/config/auth/databases/ldap.html#user-ite…

4 5

Search for missing To: header?
by Joseph Tam 20 Feb '26

20 Feb '26

Is there a proper way to torture doveadm search query to look for messages with a missing "To:" header? I played around with it and this seems to work: doveadm fetch -A text mailbox {box} NOT TO '' (Looking through a large spam corups: spam often exclude recipients in the headers as it gives the game away their personalized fraud was blasted to hundreds of addresses.) Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

More Dovecot 2.4 woes: LDAP cache bug and virtual autosubscribe
by sev monster 19 Feb '26

19 Feb '26

8 months ago I messaged this list communicating some of the issues I had with 2.4. Before I could even start testing 2.4 properly, 2 bugs had to be fixed—one that caused crashes on startup (https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/17050) and one that caused passdb to use the same caching key for all connections and as such always have the same user log in. There was another bug, one that prevented me from using LDAP binds for passdb, but it had a workaround that mostly worked without side-eeffects. All of those have since been fixed, hurray! So in my infinite naïveté, I decided to give 2.4 another shake. And it, again, does not work. Surprise! I did manage to massage the configuration to allow me to at least run 2.4 without crashing and with users able to access (most of) their mailboxes, but there are still blockers to full functionality. I face the following issues: 1. Christian Pfeiffer back in November found a bug where auth caching with LDAP did not work, and due to how it's implemented, even turning caching off would still raise an error. I experienced the same issue for both userdb iteration and passdb bind logins. I had to comment out the userdb and use a static one instead (all my users, currently, use the same UID and easily composable path, so this wasn't a big deal) and start using a service account for LDAP binds. 2. Virtual mailbox autosubscribe does not work anymore. It throws an error about trying to create the virtual mailbox. This worked in 2.3. My virtual mailbox config: namespace virtual { type = private prefix = Search Folders. mail_driver = virtual mail_path = /etc/dovecot/virtual mail_index_path = ~/dovecot-virtual.cache mail_control_path = ~/dovecot-virtual.cache mail_volatile_path = ~/dovecot-virtual.cache hidden = yes list = children subscriptions = no mailbox All { auto = subscribe special_use = \All comment = All messages, excluding Junk and Trash } mailbox Unread { auto = subscribe special_use = \Important comment = All unread messages, excluding Junk and Trash } mailbox Flagged { auto = subscribe special_use = \Flagged comment = All flagged messages } } If there is something wrong with this config that might be responsible for my issue, please let me know. Otherwise, I believe this is a regression. I understand autosubscribe is documented to (and in other situations with non-virtual boxes) create mailboxes if missing, so if this is actually a fix to make the feature work as documented, we need a new option that allows for autosubscription without attempting to create the mailbox. Otherwise, my users will not know they even have these mailboxes—no one anymore knows or cares about mailbox (re: folder) subscription and won't know where to look to get them to show up in their client. With autosubscribe enabled, I can see the mailboxes in my mail client without explicitly subscribing, but attempting to open them will throw a server error. Removing the setting will make the mailbox disappear without going into settings and explicitly subscribing. Any ETA on the first bug being fixed, and any help with the second issue (bug or not) would be greatly appreciated. Best regards. P.S.: I wanted to spread this information that wasn't mentioned at all in the documentation. The shadow passdb was removed in the move to 2.4; why exactly is neither here nor there, though I will remark that I still don't know why it was done. I had believed at the time this necessitated enabling PAM for Dovecot, which it is not by default in my distro's package (Alpine), so if I wanted to continue allowing local users to log in, I would have to build Dovecot it myself and install PAM, neither of which I particularly wanted to do. I did play with passwd-file in the past, but there were issues with it that prevented me from using it—I don't remember what they were exactly, but I believe they have since been fixed, since in my testing now it does seem to work properly in the use-cases I tested. Anyway, while going over my config and getting ready to re-install PAM, I had a thought. /etc/shadow uses the same format for the first two fields as /etc/password, and Dovecot still (supposedly) allows for passwords to be used when reading /etc/password, so wouldn't it be possible to point the driver at the shadow file? Turns out, yes, it works! I am now able to authenticate local users from /etc/shadow again. Thanks to this, I no longer need to build with PAM support and don't need to install PAM on a PAM-less system. I hope this isn't considered a bug or something and support for this use-case is removed, because I really don't want to bother once again with adding PAM when I don't have to. :)

2 2

Fedora 43 and Dovecot version 2.4.2
by Bill Steinberg 19 Feb '26

19 Feb '26

Hello, I am running Fedora 43 on a server which is running a dovecot server, version 2.4.1-8. I am not running a cluster, there is only one dovecot server running on the Fedora 43 instance. Redhat has just updated the dovecot version on Fedora 43 to version 2.4.2-5. I would like to upgrade dovecot to version 2.4.2. I assume that the dovecot_config_version should be changed to 2.4.2. Should the dovecot_storage_version be changed to 2.4.2 as well? Are there any steps that should be taken to upgrade the dovecot storage to version 2.4.2? FYI the mail_driver on the dovecot server is mbox: mail_driver = mbox. Best regards, -Bill Hello, I am running Fedora 43 on a server which is running a dovecot server, version 2.4.1-8. I am not running a cluster, there is only one dovecot server running on the Fedora 43 instance. Redhat has just updated the dovecot version on Fedora 43 to version 2.4.2-5. I would like to upgrade dovecot to version 2.4.2. I assume that the dovecot_config_version should be changed to 2.4.2. Should the dovecot_storage_version be changed to 2.4.2 as well? Are there any steps that should be taken to upgrade the dovecot storage to version 2.4.2? FYI the mail_driver on the dovecot server is mbox: mail_driver = mbox. Best regards, -Bill

2 1