- dovecot - dovecot.org

DOvecot requires both IPv4 and IPV6 to start
by TWHG Technical 04 Sep '23

04 Sep '23

Hello, I hope this is the right place to start. Ubuntu server the default listener configuration in dovecot.conf uses both IP4 and IP6 on systems that have IP6 disabled dovecot will not start. Is it possible to set the default to: listen = * to only bind to IP4 for installation and initial start. Rather than listen = *, :: which tries to bind to a non existent IP6 stack. Or simply fallback to ip4 if ip6 is not available. Thank you

6 5

DOvecot requires both IPv4 and IPV6 to start
by TWHG Technical 04 Sep '23

04 Sep '23

IPV6 is disabled in the grub command line. So before the OS boots. So there is no IPV6 support in the system. Unless one enables it in the Grub bootloader. Cheers

1 0

DOvecot requires both IPv4 and IPV6 to start
by TWHG Technical 04 Sep '23

04 Sep '23

I have tried replying twice. We have IPV6 disabled for security reasons on all server builds. An installer script failed which is how we caught this issue. We can see it is due to the config line. A graceful fallback to IPV4 if the IPV6 stack is not available would seem to be an elegant solution that would make dovecot resilient in all circunstances. Cheers Spart

4 3

no such user but Thunderbird okeys it ?
by lejeczek 04 Sep '23

04 Sep '23

Hi guys. I'm having quite bizarre situation where Dovecot logs: ... pam_unix(dovecot:auth): check pass; user unknown pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser=dupa rhost=AA.BB.CC.DD imap-login: Login: user=<dupa>, method=PLAIN, rip=AA.BB.CC.DD, lip=AA.BB.CC.DD, mpid=1756629, TLS, session=<uV7OwIIEWsJdviSg>: ... but Thunderbird allows, is okey with such user & creates an account for it. I must be having my setup miss-configured - I'm hoping it's something obvious somebody could point me towards. many thanks, L.

2 5

Dovecot director and backend on same server
by Michael Cassaniti 29 Aug '23

29 Aug '23

Hi, I'm attempting to run both the director and the backend under the same configuration on the same server. When I run doveadm director map I don't get any output. I have a shared file system between servers and clients can access any server. I was running without a director in front and seeing index corruption so I'm now attempting to use a director. I enabled additional logging for now but that didn't explain much. Dovecot version: 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d) on Alpine Linux v3.18.2 Dovecot configuration (doveconf -n) with some bits removed. # Pigeonhole version 0.5.19 (4eae2f79) # OS: Linux 6.1.43-0-lts x86_64 # Hostname: <REDACTED> auth_debug = yes auth_socket_path = director-userdb director_mail_servers = 192.168.252.2 192.168.252.3 192.168.252.4 192.168.252.5 192.168.252.20 director_servers = 192.168.252.2 192.168.252.3 192.168.252.4 192.168.252.5 192.168.252.20 imap_hibernate_timeout = 5 secs log_debug = events=* login_trusted_networks = 192.168.252.0/24 mail_debug = yes mail_fsync = always mail_gid = vmail mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_plugins = acl quota mail_uid = vmail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext imapsieve vnd.dovecot.imapsieve mmap_disable = yes namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Bin { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 30 days special_use = \Trash } mailbox Drafts { auto = subscribe special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox Spam { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 30 days special_use = \Junk } prefix = } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { acl = vfile quota = maildir:quota quota_rule = *:storage=5G quota_rule2 = Bin:ignore quota_rule3 = Spam:ignore sieve = file: ~/sieve;active=~/dovecot.sieve sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve } protocols = imap lmtp sieve service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } } service director { fifo_listener login/proxy-notify { mode = 0600 user = $default_login_user } inet_listener { port = 9090 } unix_listener director-admin { mode = 0600 } unix_listener director-userdb { mode = 0600 } unix_listener login/director { mode = 0666 } } service imap-login { executable = imap-login director } service imap { user = vmail } service ipc { unix_listener ipc { user = dovecot } } service lmtp { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { group = postfix mode = 0600 user = postfix } user = vmail } service managesieve-login { executable = managesieve-login director inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } ssl = required ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/live/<REDACTED>/fullchain.pem ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!SSLv3:!aNULL ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins = acl quota sieve } protocol imap { mail_plugins = acl quota imap_acl imap_quota imap_sieve imap_zlib } Regards, Michael Cassaniti

1 0

[bug] dovecot passes zero byte input stream when passing email with .eml attachment to apache tika parser, causes 'SEVERE' error
by pgnd 29 Aug '23

29 Aug '23

revisiting a prior, never resolved issue tika 2.4.1 'Text extraction failed' errors when dovecot+fts 2.3.19.1 passes embedded *.eml (message/rfc822) files ; org.apache.tika.parser.mail.RFC822Parser or dovecot ? https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2022-August/125085.html i now run dovecot --version 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d) with dovecot23_fts_flatcurve built 20230812 from git.HEAD on lsb_release -rd Description: Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight) Release: 38 apache/tika 2.8.0 runs on another box dovecot passes mail to tika, via config fts_tika = http://192.0.2.20:9998/tika/ indexing & search work with simple mail passed, and with attachments ... except with .eml attachments. sending this message (plain txt email, with .eml as attachment) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------O6z0p865JVYqnvxPyzc0aSLA" Message-ID: <0b7f5053-05b5-4b4f-8c7e-4a640b79a5f4(a)fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 19:37:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: sender(a)example1.com From: sender <sender(a)example1.com> Content-Language: en-US To: recipient(a)example2.com Subject: tika test This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------O6z0p865JVYqnvxPyzc0aSLA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Â tika test --------------O6z0p865JVYqnvxPyzc0aSLA Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="t2.eml" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="t2.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <89e5914a-e928-422d-824f-5b4e90170cd7(a)fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:32:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: sender(a)example1.com From: sender <sender(a)example1.com> Content-Language: en-US To: recipient(a)example2.com Subject: t2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Â t2 --------------O6z0p865JVYqnvxPyzc0aSLA-- from an off-site server to local postfix+dovecot instance tika & dovecot logs, journalctl -f -u tika Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: INFO [qtp1472012329-175] 19:52:36,918 org.apache.tika.server.core.TikaLoggingFilter Request URI: http://192.0.2.20:9998/tika/ Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: INFO [qtp1472012329-175] 19:52:36,918 org.apache.tika.server.core.resource.TikaResource /tika (message/rfc822) Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: WARN [qtp1472012329-175] 19:52:36,918 org.apache.tika.server.core.resource.TikaResource tika/: Text extraction failed (t2.eml) Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: org.apache.tika.exception.ZeroByteFileException: InputStream must have > 0 bytes Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.tika.parser.AutoDetectParser.parse(AutoDetectParser.java:185) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.tika.parser.ParserDecorator.parse(ParserDecorator.java:152) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.tika.parser.DigestingParser.parse(DigestingParser.java:57) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.tika.server.core.resource.TikaResource.parse(TikaResource.java:357) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.tika.server.core.resource.TikaResource.lambda$produceText$1(TikaResource.java:507) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.BinaryDataProvider.writeTo(BinaryDataProvider.java:177) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils.writeMessageBody(JAXRSUtils.java:1651) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSOutInterceptor.serializeMessage(JAXRSOutInterceptor.java:249) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSOutInterceptor.processResponse(JAXRSOutInterceptor.java:122) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSOutInterceptor.handleMessage(JAXRSOutInterceptor.java:84) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:307) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.interceptor.OutgoingChainInterceptor.handleMessage(OutgoingChainInterceptor.java:90) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:307) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.transport.ChainInitiationObserver.onMessage(ChainInitiationObserver.java:121) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.transport.http.AbstractHTTPDestination.invoke(AbstractHTTPDestination.java:265) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.transport.http_jetty.JettyHTTPDestination.doService(JettyHTTPDestination.java:247) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.apache.cxf.transport.http_jetty.JettyHTTPHandler.handle(JettyHTTPHandler.java:79) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:127) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:235) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1440) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:190) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1355) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:191) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:127) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:516) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.lambda$handle$1(HttpChannel.java:487) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.dispatch(HttpChannel.java:732) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:479) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:277) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:311) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:105) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.io.ChannelEndPoint$1.run(ChannelEndPoint.java:104) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:883) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$Runner.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:1034) ~[tika-server-standard-2.8.0.jar:2.8.0] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1623) [?:?] Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: Aug 12, 2023 7:52:36 PM org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils logMessageHandlerProblem Aug 12 19:52:36 svr04tika[2035]: SEVERE: Problem with writing the data, class org.apache.tika.server.core.resource.TikaResource$$Lambda$387/0x00000008012a9300, ContentType: text/plain tail -f /var/log/dovecot/*log | grep http-client 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: host 192.0.2.20: Host created 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: host 192.0.2.20: Host session created 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998 (shared): Peer created 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Peer pool created 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Peer created 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: queue http://192.0.2.20:9998: Setting up connection to 192.0.2.20:9998 (1 requests pending) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Linked queue http://192.0.2.20:9998 (1 queues linked) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: queue http://192.0.2.20:9998: Started new connection to 192.0.2.20:9998 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20/tika/] Submitted (requests left=1) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20/tika/] Waiting for request to finish 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Creating 1 new connections to handle requests (already 0 usable, connecting to 0, closing 0) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Making new connection 1 of 1 (0 connections exist, 0 pending) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Connecting 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Waiting for connect (fd=28) to finish for max 0 msecs 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: HTTP connection created (1 parallel connections exist) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Client connected (fd=28) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Connected 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Ready for requests 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Successfully connected (1 connections exist, 0 pending) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Successfully connected (1 connections exist, 0 pending) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Using 1 idle connections to handle 1 requests (1 total connections ready) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: queue http://192.0.2.20:9998: Connection to peer 192.0.2.20:9998 claimed request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20:9998/tika/] 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Claimed request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20:9998/tika/] 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20/tika/] Sent header 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: No more requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Got 422 response for request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20:9998/tika/] Unprocessable Entity (took 3 ms + 106 ms in queue) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20/tika/] Finished 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: queue http://192.0.2.20:9998: Dropping request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20:9998/tika/] 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: host 192.0.2.20: Host is idle (timeout = 100 msecs) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: request [Req1: PUT http://192.0.2.20/tika/] Free (requests left=1) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: No requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending) 2023-08-12 19:52:36 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: No more requests queued; going idle (timeout = 100 msecs) 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: host 192.0.2.20: Idle host timed out 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: host 192.0.2.20: Host destroy 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: host 192.0.2.20: Host session destroy 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: queue http://192.0.2.20:9998: Destroy 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Unlinked queue http://192.0.2.20:9998 (0 queues linked) 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Idle connection timed out 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Connection close 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Connection disconnect 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Disconnected: Connection closed (fd=28) 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Detached peer 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Lost a connection (0 queues linked, 0 connections left, 0 connections pending, 0 requests pending, 0 requests urgent) 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: conn 192.0.2.20:9998 [1]: Connection destroy 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Dropping peer now 2023-08-12 19:52:37 indexer-worker(recipient(a)example2.com)<lrVsHUQb2GR1dgAA+IOfAw:xKZLMEQb2GR3dgAA+IOfAw>: Debug: http-client: peer 192.0.2.20:9998: Peer close unclear 2 me whether this is a bug in dovecot or in tika, or a matter of (mis)config. ?? _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org

2 3

Dovecot, mail_crypt, global keys, permissions
by David Mehler 28 Aug '23

28 Aug '23

Hello, I'm using Dovecot v2.3 with the mail_crypt plugin and global keys. I am seeing this error immediately after imap login then after this error imap logs out. I'm hoping this is a simple permissions problem and the key can not be read rather than an underlying configuration issue. I do not know what this UID 5395 refers to. 2023-08-11T04:14:14.539308-04:00 hostname dovecot: imap(username(a)domain.org)<492738><zO4WTKECnvRoDWll>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: UID=5395: read() failed: read(/var/mail/mailboxes/domain.org/username/mail/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mail… failed: Private key not available: mailbox_attribute_get(INBOX, /priv/vendor/vendor.dovecot/pvt/crypt/privkeys/e9f195fe9fd1953d08e815ba6fda9b6c5ae1ed692c9adade2f958c322552cbb0) failed: Mailbox attributes not enabled (FETCH BODY[HEADER]) #ls -ld crypt drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 25 08:52 crypt/ # cd crypt #ls -l * -r-------- 1 root root 241 Jul 25 15:43 master.key -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 178 Jul 25 15:43 master.pub Thanks. Dave.

2 5

Bug - doveadm backup out-of-memory kill/crash when no separators set
by James Harrison 26 Aug '23

26 Aug '23

Hi, I hit a fun issue with doveadm when migrating from dovecot 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) to 2.3.19.1 (9b53102964) (CentOS 7 to Debian 12). When running doveadm -v -D backup -R -u "user@name" tcp:localhost:1234, I found that the first sync would always work, but subsequent runs of the command would cause doveadm to reach a subfolder (Archives/2008 in the example below) and then silently mmap() increasing powers of 2 before the OOM killer finally got it. Deleting the source folder caused it to remain stuck on the same folder, but for the deletion event. I switched memory overcommit off to force a crash, and got a gdb backtrace: #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x00007ffff786bd9f in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78 #2 0x00007ffff781cf32 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 #3 0x00007ffff7807472 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79 #4 0x00007ffff7b4ffae in default_fatal_finish (status=0, type=LOG_TYPE_PANIC) at ../lib/failures.c:465 #5 fatal_handler_real (ctx=<optimized out>, format=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ../lib/failures.c:477 #6 0x00007ffff7bfa081 in default_fatal_handler (ctx=<optimized out>, format=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ../lib/failures.c:485 #7 0x00007ffff7b5017c in i_panic (format=0x7ffff7c5d748 "data stack: Out of memory when allocating %zu bytes") at ../lib/failures.c:530 #8 0x00007ffff7b4f67f in mem_block_alloc (min_size=min_size@entry=16) at ../lib/data-stack.c:386 #9 0x00007ffff7bf8b60 in t_malloc_real (size=<optimized out>, permanent=<optimized out>) at ../lib/data-stack.c:492 #10 0x00007ffff7c348f1 in t_strdup_until (start=start@entry=0x55555565f440, end=end@entry=0x55555565f448) at ../lib/strfuncs.c:270 #11 0x00005555555adc62 in convert_name_to_remote_sep (name=0x55555565f440 "Archives/2008", tree=0x55555564e188) at dsync/dsync-mailbox-tree.c:270 #12 dsync_mailbox_tree_build_name128_remotesep_hash (tree=0x55555564e188) at dsync/dsync-mailbox-tree.c:315 #13 dsync_mailbox_tree_find_delete (tree=0x55555564e188, del=0x5555556469f0) at dsync/dsync-mailbox-tree.c:405 #14 0x00005555555a4195 in dsync_brain_mailbox_tree_add_delete (tree=0x55555564e188, other_tree=0x55555564f5f8, other_del=0x5555556469f0, node_r=0x7fffffffe350, status_r=0x7fffffffe348) at dsync/dsync-brain-mailbox-tree.c:504 #15 0x00005555555a44cd in dsync_brain_recv_mailbox_tree_deletes (brain=0x55555564b2d8) at dsync/dsync-brain-mailbox-tree.c:590 #16 0x00005555555a5365 in dsync_brain_run_real (brain=brain@entry=0x55555564b2d8, changed_r=changed_r@entry=0x7fffffffe453) at dsync/dsync-brain.c:709 #17 0x00005555555a59f9 in dsync_brain_run (changed_r=0x7fffffffe453, brain=0x55555564b2d8) at dsync/dsync-brain.c:752 #18 dsync_brain_run (changed_r=0x7fffffffe453, brain=0x55555564b2d8) at dsync/dsync-brain.c:740 #19 dsync_brain_run_io (context=<optimized out>) at dsync/dsync-brain.c:113 #20 dsync_brain_run_io (context=0x55555564b2d8) at dsync/dsync-brain.c:100 #21 0x00005555555b23df in dsync_ibc_stream_input (ibc=0x555555646720) at dsync/dsync-ibc-stream.c:232 #22 0x00007ffff7c11cd9 in io_loop_call_io (io=0x5555556418f0) at ../lib/ioloop.c:737 #23 0x00007ffff7c13aa2 in io_loop_handler_run_internal (ioloop=ioloop@entry=0x55555560bf40) at ../lib/ioloop-epoll.c:222 #24 0x00007ffff7c13b50 in io_loop_handler_run (ioloop=ioloop@entry=0x55555560bf40) at ../lib/ioloop.c:789 #25 0x00007ffff7c13d10 in io_loop_run (ioloop=0x55555560bf40) at ../lib/ioloop.c:762 #26 0x000055555558b22e in cmd_dsync_run_remote (user=0x555555637248) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-dsync.c:543 #27 cmd_dsync_run (_ctx=0x55555561f288, user=0x555555637248) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-dsync.c:750 #28 0x000055555558bd12 in doveadm_mail_next_user (ctx=0x55555561f288, error_r=0x7fffffffe818) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-mail.c:464 #29 0x000055555558cf45 in doveadm_mail_cmd_exec (wildcard_user=0x0, ctx=0x55555561f288) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-mail.c:659 #30 doveadm_cmd_ver2_to_mail_cmd_wrapper (cctx=0x7fffffffe970) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-mail.c:988 #31 0x0000555555597622 in doveadm_cmd_run_ver2 (argc=5, argv=0x55555560ba38, cctx=cctx@entry=0x7fffffffe970) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-cmd.c:465 #32 0x0000555555597697 in doveadm_cmd_try_run_ver2 (cmd_name=<optimized out>, argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, cctx=0x7fffffffe970) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm-cmd.c:363 #33 0x000055555557919a in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ./src/doveadm/doveadm.c:361 Neither server had a separator set in the inbox namespace. Having identified the convert_name_to_remote_sep function as the likely trigger point I set the separator to / on both ends, and doveadm backup now runs without issue. Can provide config if helpful but I think probably irrelevant to this one - the namespace config is the default other than the separator item. May be worth mentioning that having the separator set can avoid this condition in the doveadm backup docs - this took me a while to figure out! -- Cheers, James Harrison

2 1

Stop Logging to Syslog
by Asai 25 Aug '23

25 Aug '23

Greetings, My logging config is as follows: # doveadm log find Debug: /var/log/dovecot-debug.log Info: /var/log/dovecot.log Warning: /var/log/dovecot.log Error: /var/log/dovecot.log Fatal: /var/log/dovecot.log However, I'm still getting logs in /var/log/messages which I don't want. I've looked into /etc/rsyslog.conf for clues, but can't find anything that would point to Dovecot logging to /var/log/messages. Can anyone point me in the right direction here? Thank you, Asai

2 1

libdovecot-storage.so.0.0.0 [.] maildir_filename_base_hash with high cpu load
by habi li 25 Aug '23

25 Aug '23

[image: image.png] we find the libdovecot-storage.so cpu so high ,can you help me

3 2