- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] different mail_max_userip settings
by Federico Bianchi 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Is it possible to have mail_max_userip set to a value for localhost (webmail) and to another value for everything else? Best regards Federico Bianchi Dipartimento di Storia delle Arti Universita` di Pisa via Trieste, 38 - I-56126 Pisa (Italy) tel.(+39) 050 221 6 024; fax (+39) 050 221 6 001 e-mail: <f.bianchi(a)arte.unipi.it> =================================================== !DISCLAIMER!: my e-mail reflects _my_own_ opinions! ===================================================

3 3

[Dovecot] Seq-range order in sequence-set are matter?
by Lay András 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi! I have a mailbox with 12 messages. Theese two commands: x fetch 5,8:12 (UID) * 5 FETCH (UID 10) * 8 FETCH (UID 13) * 9 FETCH (UID 14) * 10 FETCH (UID 15) * 11 FETCH (UID 16) * 12 FETCH (UID 17) x OK Fetch completed. and x fetch 8:12,5 (UID) * 5 FETCH (UID 10) * 8 FETCH (UID 13) * 9 FETCH (UID 14) * 10 FETCH (UID 15) * 11 FETCH (UID 16) * 12 FETCH (UID 17) x OK Fetch completed. outputs are equeal, this clean. But: x fetch 1:*,5 (UID) * 1 FETCH (UID 4) * 2 FETCH (UID 5) * 3 FETCH (UID 6) * 4 FETCH (UID 7) * 5 FETCH (UID 10) * 6 FETCH (UID 11) * 7 FETCH (UID 12) * 8 FETCH (UID 13) * 9 FETCH (UID 14) * 10 FETCH (UID 15) * 11 FETCH (UID 16) * 12 FETCH (UID 17) x OK Fetch completed. and x fetch 5,1:* (UID) * 5 FETCH (UID 10) * 6 FETCH (UID 11) * 7 FETCH (UID 12) * 8 FETCH (UID 13) * 9 FETCH (UID 14) * 10 FETCH (UID 15) * 11 FETCH (UID 16) * 12 FETCH (UID 17) x OK Fetch completed. command outputs are NOT equal? Why? Thank you! Lay

2 1

[Dovecot] Override userdb=passwd gid
by Veiko Kukk 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi! I have problem with Dovecot 2.1.1 writing maildir files as users primary group. Tried to override gid value, but probably i'm missing something... doveconf -n # 2.1.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-308.11.1.el5 x86_64 CentOS release 5.8 (Final) auth_verbose = yes info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot/info.log listen = * log_path = /var/log/dovecot/error.log mail_location = maildir:%h/Maildir passdb { args = cache_key=%u dovecot driver = pam } protocols = imap service imap-login { process_min_avail = 40 service_count = 1 } service imap { process_limit = 2048 vsz_limit = 2 G } ssl = required ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { args = blocking=no gid=mail driver = passwd } Also tried using 'override_fields = gid=mail'. Users are from nss and winbind. Any ideas what i might do wrong? -- Veiko

2 1

[Dovecot] Difference between proxy_refresh and proxy_timeout in director
by Angel L. Mateo 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hello, I know proxy_timeout is the timeout for the director operation. But what is the purpose for proxy_refresh? -- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o) y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\ http://www.um.es/atica _(___V Tfo: 868887590 Fax: 868888337

2 1

[Dovecot] imapc: Restrict the number of connections
by René Neumann 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi, I have managed to get an imapc connection to another server and bind its contents to only one account (via global ACL). The namespace itself is created as public, though it does not seem to make a difference for this use case (i.e., it does not matter, whether its type is 'public', 'shared', or 'private'). namespace { hidden = no list = children location = imapc: prefix = Gemeinsam. separator = . subscriptions = no type = public } One problem remains: Though there is only one account that is allowed to use this imapc-connection, each imap-process opens a connection to the imapc'd server. Is this caused directly by the imapc_*-definitions in the config? Or is there a way of restricting this to only the account which actually uses it. Used dovecot version: 2.1.8 Thanks, René

2 1

[Dovecot] bcypt availability
by Nick Edwards 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Dear Timo, Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes? In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the weakest link in the database security. So, are you planning on this and if so what sort of timeframe / version would you expect it to be in beta ? Nik

5 6

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with Plus addressing and detail part of subaddress.
by Sean Kamath 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

On Jul 15, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-07-15 4:50 AM, Sean Kamath <kamath(a)moltingpenguin.com> wrote: >> Before I dive in and upgrade everything, am I missing something simple? > > dovecot -n output maybe? Certainly (wasn't on the list of "things to put in a post" on the web site, so I missed it): # 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: SunOS 5.10 sun4u base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ hostname = mail.enoent.net lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes lda_original_recipient_header = X-Original-To lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes mail_location = sdbox:~/Mail:INDEX=/var/dovecot/indices/%u managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date passdb { driver = pam } plugin { recipient_delimiter = + sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/.sieve } protocols = imap sieve ssl_cert = </etc/mail/certs/server.crt ssl_key = </etc/mail/certs/server.key userdb { driver = passwd } protocol lda { mail_plugins = " sieve" } Sean

2 4

[Dovecot] incremental backups of maildir via rsync
by Harald Dunkel 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, I would like to do incremental backups of the users' maildir directories to a dedicated backup host (using "rsync -SHa" and rsnapshot). Problem is: Dovecot bloats the incremental backup by changing the file names again and again. Is there some way to tell Dovecot to keep meta information separate from the file names? Any helpful comment would be highly appreciated. Harri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlADpIsACgkQUTlbRTxpHjdS+ACgkPRnzRD2jrcz09kQx9jj9j5v Y1UAniJdRa14hc53gLbxkuBPbx5V5BCh =6nvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 6

[Dovecot] Last login datetime on accounts
by Robert Blayzor 16 Jul '12

16 Jul '12

I have searching for the best way to tell if a Dovecot user is idle by finding the last time they have logged in. Right now the best way I can tell is to do something like "touch" a file in the users homedir via a post login exec. This seems like a LOT of overhead, to accomplish such a simple task, especially if your doing a lot of dozens of logins per second. Is there an easier/better way? Is there a way to possibly tell Dovecot to refresh the mod time on an index file whenever the user successfully auths or to refresh a separate file in the homedir, ie: ~/.lastlogin (not ~/Maildir/.lastlogin as that would obviously cause some issues) Seems like something that would be far less overhead than calling a shell, execing another command, etc. I'm open to other ideas/alternatives if they are out there! TIA -- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rblayzor(a)inoc.net http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/

4 4

[Dovecot] Multi Server Exim/Dovecot and NFS
by Robert Blayzor 16 Jul '12

16 Jul '12

In reading the Dovecot NFS WIKI entry: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS It mentions a FreeBSD NFS client caching bug. I believe that bug only exists pre-8.x ? It seems that a patch in the PR notes was MFC'd and made it into 8.x at some point. (at least I checked the source in 8.3 and it was there). So I assume that FreeBSD 8.x mitigates the issue? Maybe not? So our deployment is multi server Dovecot/Exim running on FreeBSD servers, frontended by a layer3 load balancing switch and a NetApp NFSv3 datastore. The only real concern we have right now is race conditions and file write contention on the Dovecot index files. Our original plan was to use Dovecot LMTP on the servers to deliver to the inbox, but that doesn't seem to be recommended as we'll have a number of servers all acting as primary MX for domains and delivering to the same set of mailboxes. So are the Dovecot dotlock file locking mechanisms not enough for multiple servers trying to write/access index files in Maildirs? If we have to deliver straight to the ~/Maildir/new out of Exim, that's fine, also. We're just wondering if there is a added benefit of actually using LMTP. (other than making sure the index are kept the most recent). The other concern we have is client mailbox access. While we can make sessions "sticky" from one IP so they hit the same server, it doesn't help with the person that checks their email via POP from their PC while having their mobile phone access it via IMAP. (obviously from different IP addresses). So I guess there is some possibly index file write contention there as well. (though hopefully this should be rare). I'm curious as to know others experiences with a similar deployment. TIA -- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rblayzor(a)inoc.net http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/

5 7