- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] French characters from 2.0.x to 2.1.3
by Frank Bonnet 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Hello Maybe it's a coincidence but it "seems" since I upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.1.3 that some French characters ( a with accents by example ) are not well displayed anymore using thunderbird and are replaced by a "?" character Thanks for any info

2 2

[Dovecot] imapc / namespace question
by René Neumann 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Hi, I've got two questions regarding imapc and namespaces: 1) Is there a way of stating, that I only want part of the hierarchy on the end of an imapc connection to be available here? My "problem": On the other end the layout is: INBOX.Shared.{some,nice,folders} If I mirror this into my dovecot hierarchy with prefix "Gemeinsam" I get the following folder structure: Gemeinsam.INBOX.Shared.{some,nice,folders} But I want to ignore the two top-most parts of the hierarchy, i.e. I want it to look: Gemeinsam.{some,nice,folders} Is this possible? I tried with 'location=imapc:INBOX.Shared.' but this did not change anything. 2) "Private" namespaces only make sense, if location contains something user-specific like "%u" or "~". Is this correct? If yes: Is there some other way to make something like an imapc connection only appear for one user, if there is nothing in the location or imapc_user to denote the user it belongs to and hence I cannot use "private"? The only way I see currently is to use "shared" and set up ACLs to forbid all users except one to access the namespace (which gets slightly ugly as I have to use global ACLs, as -- I think -- there is no way to store ACLs for an imapc storage). Thanks, René

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] Error in logs indicating broken files
by Joseph Tam 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Steve Campbell <campbell(a)cnpapers.com> writes: > I'm seeing a couple of errors in my log file indicating corruption of > index files. > > Error: Corrupted index cache file/home/xxxxxx/mail/.imap/sent-mail/dovecot.index.cache: Broken virtual size for mail UID 67: 1 Time(s) > Error: FETCH [] for mailbox ~/mail/sent-mail UID 67 got too little data: 6203 vs 7478: 1 Time(s) > > This account is used by multiple users, but it is not a shared account > (haven't set any of those up yet - still new to me), so I would expect > corruption possibilities when multiple users modify the account folders > in some manner. This is just one dovecot IMAP client process moaning after another user client process pulled the rug out from under it by modifying the mailbox. I get a few dozen log entries of this sort per week with ~200 IMAP users without shared access. Unless your users actually complain about a problem, I think it's safe to ignore them. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

2 1

[Dovecot] Correction of home and mail directory config
by "L. Grün" 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

Hello, after running dovecot for a while, I stumbled accross the warning, not to have mail and home directory settings point to one and same directory. Here is the output of dovecot -n: > dovecot -n # 1.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 i686 Debian 6.0.4 ext3 log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: imaps imap disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login mail_max_userip_connections: 100 mail_privileged_group: mail mail_uid: 5000 mail_gid: 5000 mail_location: maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir mail_full_filesystem_access: yes mbox_write_locks: fcntl dotlock namespace: type: private separator: . inbox: yes list: yes subscriptions: yes lda: auth_socket_path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master postmaster_address: xxxx(a)xxxx.org mail_plugins: sieve log_path: auth default: mechanisms: plain login passdb: driver: sql args: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf userdb: driver: static args: uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir allow_all_users=yes socket: type: listen client: path: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth mode: 432 user: postfix group: postfix master: path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mode: 384 user: vmail In "args: uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir allow_all_users=yes" I should delete "Maildir". My question is: What files do I have to copy from /Maildir to the home directory /var/vmail/%d/%n/ ? Are there other side effects, I have to consider? Thank you very much for your help! Stefan

3 2

[Dovecot] sieve against ldap in Dovecot 1.2 vacation messeage
by Victor Oñate 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

Hi. I need configure "sieve" against ldap this is my file configuration dovecot.conf plugin { quota = dirsize:user sieve_dir = ~/sieve } protocol lda { mail_plugins = sieve } auth default { mechanisms = plain passdb pam { } userdb ldap { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf } user = nobody } I dont know what I have to put in dovecot-ldap.conf, ofcourse I have a atribut in LDAP by user with a vacation messeage "I'm out of office, please contact Mr. Black" this is dovecot-ldap.conf hosts = server auth_bind = yes ldap_version = 3 base = dc=dominio,dc=uk deref = never scope = subtree user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,uidNumber=uid,gidNumber=gid,mail=Maildir,mailQuotaSize=quota_rule=*:storage=%$ user_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u)) The principal idea is keep the control the message by user with LDAP and Dovecot(IMAP). without touching the postfix configuration file is that possible, or am I dreaming. Thanks.. Victor Oñate.

2 1

[Dovecot] Dovecot upgrade
by Jos Chrispijn 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

Can someone tell me how I can upgrade from Dovecot 1.x to 2.x best? thanks for your reply, Jos Chrispijn

3 2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail
by Joseph Tam 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

> i installed new version 2.0.20. but its the same problem > > args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users ... > > Apr 21 17:47:16 host1 sendmail[32561]: q3LElF79032559: to=<jamal(a)example.com>, ctladdr=<root(a)host1.bigmama.com> (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=dovecot, pri=120292, relay=dovecot, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: dovecot mailer (/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda) exited with EX_TEMPFAIL Any logs for dovecot? Same sendmail configs as before or did you try the extra flag I suggested? Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[Dovecot] Configuration advices for a 50000 mailboxes server(s)
by Frank Bonnet 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

Hello I need some feedbacks advices of experienced admins I will have to setup in few monthes an email system for approx 50K "intensives" users. The only mandatory thing will be I must use HP proliant servers The operating system will be FreeBSD or Linux Thank you for any advices

5 11

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail
by Joseph Tam 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

Hadi Salem <almarzuki2001(a)hotmail.com> writes: > Im configuring sendmail with dovecot for virtual users using > password file and file for user name. on centos. > > dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 Maybe I can beat Charles Marcus to the punch and recommend you upgrade to the latest version, otherwise you'll run into bugs that have already been fixed. > Mdovecot, > P=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver, F=DFMPhnu9,S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP, > R=EnvToSMTP/HdrFromSMTP,T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix,A=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > $u > ... > Apr 19 20:52:13 host1 sendmail[22311]: q3JHqDAR022309: > to=<jamal(a)example.com>, ctladdr=<root(a)host1.bigmama.com> (0/0), > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=dovecot, pri=120292, relay=dovecot, > dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: dovecot mailer (/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver) exited > with EX_TEMPFAIL Is there any logs from deliver? If not, look at this page to configure logging http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA That's your best chance at finding out the problem. I don't have virtual users, so I can't venture to say whether this is part of the problem. I know I had to fiddle with the mailer flags (you have "DFMPhnu9") to get my setup working, but I don't remember what I did or why. Try adding the "S" flag and see if that helps. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

3 2

[Dovecot] migrate 15K users to new domain name
by Jan-Frode Myklebust 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

I need to migrate 15K users to a new domain name, and plan to use "dsync mirror" in the transition phase. Could someone confirm that this should work: Before giving users access to new-domain do a first sync to get all the stale data over: for user in $old-domain; do dsync mirror $user@old-domain $user@new-domain done Configure sieve vacation filter to forward all messages from $user@old-domain to $user@new-domain, and notify sender of changed address. Give users access to both new-domain and old-domain, and do a final sync. for user in $old-domain; do dsync mirror $user@old-domain $user@new-domain dsync mirror $user@old-domain $user@new-domain # twice in case the first was slow drop all messages for $user@old-domain Leave notice message for $user@old-domain saying he should use new-domain done Wait a few weeks/months, and then drop all users@old-domain. Does this look sensible? -jf

3 6