- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Correct naming scheme for dovecot / squirrelmail subfolders?
by M. Fioretti 28 Dec '06

28 Dec '06

Hello, I am running dovecot 1.0-0_34.rc15 and squirrelmail 1.4.8-2 on a Centos 4 server. Right now all messages are delivered to maildir /var/mail/vhosts/virtual_mail_root/, which has its cur, tmp, new subdirectories. I need to (re) configure postfix, dovecot and squirrelmail so that email is filtered and dovecot serves different boxes to squirrelmail, that is when I log in in squirrelmail I see: Inbox work (5) friends (6) lists (35) Sent Trash Spam that is every subfolder listed under Inbox with the number of unread messages. Now, I do know how to filter incoming email in different folders with postfix. The part still missing, in spite of several online searches, is the correct _naming_ and nesting of all the new mailboxes. In other words, if now everything goes into /var/mail/vhosts/virtual_mail_root/ : 1) what is the currect _name_ to give to the future "work" inbox ?? /var/mail/vhosts/virtual_mail_root/work/ /var/mail/vhosts/virtual_mail_root/INBOX.work/ what else? 2) which parameters must be changed and how in dovecot and/or squirrelmail (or any IMAP client in my home PC) so that folders are recognized and displayed as I wish? Thanks in advance for any feedback, Marco -- The right way to make everybody love Free Standards and Free Software: http://digifreedom.net/node/73

1 0

[Dovecot] Dovecot + Outlook express + permission denied
by Nagy László 28 Dec '06

28 Dec '06

Hello, I have an account (called awesome) that does not have access to some public shared folders. I can use this account from Mozilla Thunderbird, but I cannot use it from Outlook. I opened /var/log/maillog. When I try to list all folders, I get this in the log: Dec 28 09:57:38 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): opendir(/var/mail/public) failed: Permission denied However, outlook displays three folders: Inbox, Public and Trash. It says "One or more problems occured downloading your list of folder from your account." That is fine, except that not all folders are listed. (There are others: "Contact", "Calendar" and "ShopzeusArchive".) Then I subscribe to "Inbox" and "Trash". I DO NOT subscribe to "Public", because the account has no access to "Public". Then I click on "Inbox" (inside outlook) and I get this very long text: Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<awesome>, method=PLAIN, rip=62.112.202.90, lip=195.228.74.135, TLS Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Effective uid=1029, gid=1003 Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Namespace: type=private, prefix=#mbox/, sep=/, inbox=yes, hidden=yes, subscriptions=no Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): mbox: data=/home/awesome/:INBOX=/var/mail/awesome Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): mbox: root=/home/awesome, index=/home/awesome, inbox=/var/mail/awesome Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Namespace: type=private, prefix=, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, subscriptions=no Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: data=/home/awesome/Maildir Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: root=/home/awesome/Maildir, index=/home/awesome/Maildir, control=, inbox= Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Namespace: type=public, prefix=Public/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, subscriptions=no Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: data=/var/mail/public:CONTROL=/home/awesome/Maildir/public/control Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: root=/var/mail/public, index=/var/mail/public, control=/home/awesome/Maildir/public/control, inbox= Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): lstat(/var/mail/public/cur) failed: Permission denied Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Sending log messages too fast, throttling.. Dec 28 09:57:54 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Namespace: type=public, prefix=Calendars/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, subscriptions=no Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: data=/var/mail/calendars:CONTROL=/home/awesome/Maildir/calendars/control Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: root=/var/mail/calendars, index=/var/mail/calendars, control=/home/awesome/Maildir/calendars/control, inbox= Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): lstat(/var/mail/calendars/cur) failed: Permission denied Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Namespace: type=public, prefix=Contacts/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, subscriptions=no Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: data=/var/mail/contacts:CONTROL=/home/awesome/Maildir/contacts/control Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: root=/var/mail/contacts, index=/var/mail/contacts, control=/home/awesome/Maildir/contacts/control, inbox= Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): lstat(/var/mail/contacts/cur) failed: Permission denied Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): Namespace: type=public, prefix=ShopzeusArchive/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, subscriptions=no Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: data=/var/mail/shopzeusarchive:CONTROL=/home/awesome/Maildir/shopzeusarchive/control Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): maildir: root=/var/mail/shopzeusarchive, index=/var/mail/shopzeusarchive, control=/home/awesome/Maildir/shopzeusarchive/control, inbox= Dec 28 09:57:55 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): lstat(/var/mail/shopzeusarchive/cur) failed: Permission denied It is very strange. Why outlook wants to open these folders? I only clicked on "Inbox", it should only open "Inbox", am I right? Outlook says "Could not select 'Inbox' on the IMAP server. You might try refreshing your folders list to synchronize with the IMAP server." But this is a lie. It tried to open many other folders, not just "INBOX". I think that my dovecot configuration is okay. I have different public and private folders. Some users can access all of them, others cannot. Using different groups of users, I can distribute permissions without problems. But I cannot make dovecot "hide" shared folders. Nor can I force all of my users to use Thunderbird. So how can I make outlook working? Thanks, Laszlo

1 1

[Dovecot] Hebrew folder names
by Dotan Cohen 26 Dec '06

26 Dec '06

I'm considering Dovecot for an IMAP server. Can I name the IMAP folders in Hebrew (utf-8) with Dovecot? Any known gotchas? Thanks in advance. Dotan Cohen http://lyricslist.com/ http://what-is-what.com/

2 4

[Dovecot] imap failed asssert in imap-bodystructure.c
by Matt Ronge 26 Dec '06

26 Dec '06

I'm running Dovecot on a Debian system which recently has been failing on an assert(). I have a spam mailbox that if I try and open (from any client), the imap process dies and this is written to the error logs: Dec 21 18:57:11 theronge imap(mronge): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) Dec 21 18:57:11 theronge dovecot: child 28911 (imap) killed with signal 6 I had this same issue with my Inbox a few weeks ago, so I moved all the e-mail out and moved each piece back in one by one, in order to determine if a piece of mail was causing the issue. As soon as all my mail was moved back in, the issue went away and I was able to load my Inbox as usual. I still have the same issue with my spam mailbox, is there anything particular I can do to help debug this issue? In the past I've rm'ed all the mail in my spam mailbox and that fixes it. One thing that may be related is that I only noticed this issue after I had setup Spambayes, which does it's work via procmail. The mailboxes that I've had the issue with, all had headers that contain a Spambayes header, usually like so: X-Spam-Score: 26 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Sender: mailman-bounces(a)acm.uiuc.edu Errors-To: mailman-bounces(a)acm.uiuc.edu X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Authenticated-Sender: X-Spam-Details: rule=cautious-plus_notspam policy=cautious-plus score=26 mlx=26 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0611300000 definitions=main-0612060023 X-Spam-OrigSender: mailman-bounces(a)acm.uiuc.edu X-Spam-Bar: *** X-Spambayes-Classification: spam; 1.00 X-Spambayes-Trained: spam I'm not sure if it's related, but it's a shock in the dark on my part. Any suggested steps that might help isolate this bug? -- Matt Ronge

2 3

[Dovecot] Intermittent "cannot update mailbox" problems w/ postfix & dovecot
by John Reddy 26 Dec '06

26 Dec '06

I hate asking questions on mailing lists, but I've exhausted my googling and FAQ trawling skills. If I've missed the pertinent doc, please tell me where to RTFM. Environment: I'm running postfix 2.3.2 on a Solaris 10 server. Mail goes into standard mbox format in /var/mail. Users can access their mail via shell (pine, mutt), POP3 or IMAP, and the pop3/imap server is dovecot-1.0.rc15. Problem: For a few users, mail occasionally fails to deliver. The mail is accepted by smtpd, passes cleanup and qmgr without incident. When it gets to local delivery, though, local complains that "cannot open file: Permission denied". A sample log entry (slightly sanitized): Dec 7 09:42:05 solaris-host local[18332]: [ID 197553 mail.info] D35C3445C: to=<bubba(a)solaris-host.sample.com>, relay=local, delay=0.17, delays=0.09/0/0/0.08, dsn=5.2.0, status=bounced (cannot update mailbox /var/mail/bubba for user bubba. cannot open file: Permission denied) Dec 7 10:52:26 solaris-host local[20775]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 670C9445D: to=<jack(a)solaris-host.sample.com>, relay=local, delay=15, delays=8.9/0/0/6.5, dsn=5.2.0, status=bounced (cannot update mailbox /var/mail/jack for user jack. cannot open file: Permission denied) Does anyone have any advice on how I might get better details about why postfix is having trouble accessing the file? Has anyone run into this before? My initial suspicion is a lock file from the users' POP3 connections... Thanks in advance for any help. -John

2 2

[Dovecot] [Fwd: mbox somewhere else?]
by Kartagis 26 Dec '06

26 Dec '06

In case it's missed :) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Dovecot] mbox somewhere else? Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:26:30 +0200 From: Tolga <kartagis(a)kunduz.org> To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Hi, I want to store my folders somewhere else, it used be in ~/mail. Is this as easy as moving everything in ~/mail to /var/mail/ and editing /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf to read mail_location=mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u ? Also, is the syntax mail_location=mbox:/var/mail/%u-folders:INBOX=/var/mail/%u correct? Regards, -- Whatever it is, I fear Greeks even when they bring gifts. -- Publius Vergilius Maro (Virgil)

2 2

[Dovecot] vpopmail problem
by Toni Panadès 26 Dec '06

26 Dec '06

Hi! Sorry for my english... I recently know about dovecot and I try to use it on my server. Previously I used qmail+vpopmail+courier and now I want to use postfix+dovecot and, to mantain all my mailboxes structure, I try to use dovecot with vpopmail. During configuration the script detects my vpopmail installation and configuration and after I get this status: Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local File offsets ........................ : 64bit I/O loop method ..................... : poll File change notification method ..... : dnotify Building with SSL support ........... : yes (OpenSSL) Building with IPv6 support .......... : yes Building with pop3 server ........... : yes Building with mail delivery agent .. : yes Building with GSSAPI support ........ : no Building with user database modules . : static prefetch passwd passwd-file checkpassword vpopmail (modules) Building with password lookup modules : passwd passwd-file shadow checkpassword vpopmail (modules) And after some testing I start the daemon with this config: protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s auth default { mechanisms = plain passdb vpopmail {} userdb vpopmail {} user = vpopmail } I connect to localhost via pop3 and when I try to auth some user I get this: Dec 26 01:27:45 anet dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=IMAP secured lip=127.0.0.1 rip=127.0.0.1 resp=AHNyb2RvbkBncmFjaWFuZXQub3JnAHR3aXN0 Dec 26 01:27:45 anet dovecot: auth(default): vpopmail(srodon(a)anet.org,127.0.0.1): unknown user Dec 26 01:27:46 anet dovecot: auth(default): client out: FAIL 1 user=srodon(a)anet.org Dec 26 01:27:46 anet dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login: user=<srodon(a)anet.org>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured I tried other auth methods but I get an "Unsupported authentication mechanism" error. A try with encrypted password files and with a plan one. thanks in advance!

1 0

[Dovecot] Sizing login_process_size and login_processes_count?
by Francisco Reyes 25 Dec '06

25 Dec '06

Any suggestions on sizing login_process_size and login_processes_count for a server expected to be doing 100 to 200 simultaneous connections? Is there a way to separate login_processes_count between imap and pop? I would like to have at least 50 imap processes ready, but we rarely have any more than 5 to 10 pop connections. Would be a shame to have 40+ pop login processes doing nothing most of the time. For now did login_process_size = 96, but with an average of 100 to 200 and some rare ocassion of 300+ connections I am wondering what is a reasonable number for login_process_size.

3 5

[Dovecot] LDA + sieve +Maildir?
by Francisco Reyes 25 Dec '06

25 Dec '06

I have a working Dovecot + LDA + Maildir setup and am looking to implement sieve with it. The examples that I have seen seem to be for mbox. Does sieve work with maildir? Looking to move mails marked as spam to a spam folder. Also we have a feature we offer to send spam to a different account in the domain. Could this also be done with sieve?

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 44, Issue 53
by Lars Skovgaard 25 Dec '06

25 Dec '06

Den 25/12/2006 kl. 13.00 skrev Adrian Gill: > Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:43:40 -0000 > From: "Adrian Gill" <adrian(a)ssinternet.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] NTLM authentication woes > To: <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> > Message-ID: <023001c7277a$ae1bcf60$4107a8c0@AdeLaptop> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=response > > Lars wrote: > [Re Outlook handling of SPA/NTLM] >> Turning on auth_debug and auth_verbose has led me to discover that MS >> Outlook uses the users full name as login, instead of whatever is >> entered >> in the account-information - if the user "John Doe" has the login >> "jd(a)domain.com", Outlook sends "John Doe" instead. This of course >> fails. >> Strangely enough, if I turn off "Use Secure Authentication" from >> within >> Outlook, the login-name from the account- information is used as >> it should >> be. > > Not a solution I'm afraid, but just to let you know that I've been > experimenting with NTLM (actually with Exim for authenticated SMTP) > for a > while with a few users and had the same problems - different > versions of > Outlook behave slightly differently, but none (that I've found) > seem to work > properly. Usually Outlook sends the users Windows Logon username and > password (which is often their name, but often something else too like > 'Administrator') initially, and sometimes then retries > automatically with > the correct details. > > Things never seem to be that consistent though, except that they're > consistently bad. Frustratingly, the only option I have is to tell > users > that have problems to use Thunderbird or something else and use > cram-md5 > instead. > > As far as Outlook goes I think Microsoft seem to only bother > testing NTLM > running with MS Exchange on a local network... v.annoying! > > (Sorry not that helpful a post) > > Adrian Hi Adrian Thanks for your reply. I suspected as much, though I had hoped that there was an easy applicable solution. Sadly my MS-using clients are reluctant at best to change their applications, flawed as they may be, so I guess they'll have to live with things as they are for now. MS really should fix their apps, but that's a topic for a discussion of it's own. I use a mysql-backend, and suspect I could change the login-call to match whatever Outlook or Entourage choose to send, but that would be difficult to make consistent enough to be truly workable, I think... Thanks for your time /Lars

1 0