- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Problems with Outlook 2002 SP3 & Dovecot 0.99.13 Redux
by Md 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Hi, I posted this question a while back and didn't get much response. Since then, I've done a bit more experimenting and wonder if someone can help me move forward towards resolution. The orignal question... > I'm running Dovecot0.99.13 on Fedora Core 3 and things work fine when using either > Thunderbird 1.0 or Outlook Express as IMAP clients. Outlook (2002 SP3) on the other hand > runs incredibly slowly, or just outright hangs. I've discovered that if I delete and recrete .../Maildir in the user account such that the directory exists but is empty, then outlook seems to behave. If on the other-hand, I try to create a folder, with outlook, outlook will hang and the folder won't be created. If I create the folder with another client and then go back to using outlook, outlook will hang. I've taken some network traces and have annotated them here... Starting with an empty "Maildir" Time Source Destination Protocol Info 8.515435 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: * OK dovecot ready. 8.516056 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0000 CAPABILITY 8.516539 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SORT THREAD=REFERENCES MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT IDLE CHILDREN LISTEXT LIST-SUBSCRIBED NAMESPACE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN 8.516733 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0001 LOGIN "xxx" "xxx" 8.594634 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: 0001 OK Logged in. 8.640521 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: + idling 8.640709 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: DONE 8.640983 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: 0002 OK Idle completed. 8.641165 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0003 LIST "" "" 8.641315 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: * LIST (\Noselect) "." "" 8.642387 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0004 LIST "" "INBOX" 8.642956 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." INBOX 8.657424 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0005 LSUB "" "*" 8.657925 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: 0005 OK Lsub completed. 8.660627 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0006 IDLE 8.660973 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: + idling Now try to create a sub-folder using outlook: 0.000000 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: DONE 0.000587 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: 0006 OK Idle completed. 0.000910 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0008 IDLE 0.001113 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: + idling And there outlook just hangs. Killing outlook and starting it again gives this trace: 5.110260 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 TCP 1953 > imap [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=64240 Len=0 MSS=1460 5.111826 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: * OK dovecot ready. 5.112139 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0000 CAPABILITY 5.112600 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SORT THREAD=REFERENCES MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT IDLE CHILDREN LISTEXT LIST-SUBSCRIBED NAMESPACE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN 5.112798 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0001 LOGIN "xxx" "xxx" 5.127237 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: 0001 OK Logged in. 5.135355 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0002 IDLE 5.137334 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: + idling 5.138060 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: DONE 5.138273 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: 0002 OK Idle completed. 5.138505 192.168.73.1 192.168.73.3 IMAP Request: 0004 IDLE 5.138646 192.168.73.3 192.168.73.1 IMAP Response: + idling And there outlook just hangs again. Any ideas or help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Md

2 1

[Dovecot] imap-login zombies
by Robin Breathe 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Running dovecot-0.99.13 on Solaris9/Sparc with ~25k users, we are having regularly recurring problems with large numbers imap-login/pop3-login drones, cycling on poll(). Over the course of 1-2 days, the number of such processes slowly rises to >1000, exhausts resources, and necessitates that dovecot be restarted (having killed all current active and zombie child processes). Nothing of interest seems to be logged with the possible exception of a reasonably high number of aborted logins (~10/hour). Can anyone offer any guidance as to how to track down this bug and help get it resolved? Any help would be much appreciated, as we would very much like to see this resolved in the 0.99 branch. Regards, Robin

2 1

[Dovecot] dovecot-auth hangs with IO leak
by Alan Tam 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Hi dovecot, I am using the debian dovecot packages on a system running LDAP. My /etc/pam.d/common-* looks like this, which simply means try /etc/passwd first, and try LDAP using the same password if it is failed. account [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix.so account required pam_ldap.so use_first_pass account required pam_permit.so auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix.so auth required pam_ldap.so use_first_pass auth required pam_permit.so session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix.so session required pam_ldap.so use_first_pass session required pam_mkhomedir.so skel=/etc/skel umask=0002 session required pam_permit.so When many LDAP users login, /var/log/auth.log shows many (expected) error like: (note "pam_unix") Feb 3 18:16:15 eta dovecot-auth: (pam_unix) authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=127.0.0.1 Feb 3 18:16:19 eta dovecot-auth: (pam_unix) check pass; user unknown After recent upgrades from probably 0.99.10 to 0.99.13, these lines begin to appear in /var/log/mail.log: Feb 3 16:31:00 eta dovecot-auth: Login process has too old (123s) requests, killing it. Feb 3 16:31:00 eta dovecot-auth: Login process has too old (124s) requests, killing it. And some more like this, which shows the problem: Feb 3 16:45:23 eta dovecot-auth: I/O leak: 0x8054940 (13) Feb 3 16:45:23 eta dovecot-auth: I/O leak: 0x8054940 (14) Feb 3 16:45:23 eta dovecot-auth: I/O leak: 0x8054940 (15) The problem can be solved by changing /etc/pam.d/dovecot to: auth required pam_ldap.so account required pam_ldap.so session required pam_mkhomedir.so skel=/etc/skel umask=0002 session required pam_ldap.so This change means PAM not fail auth for /etc/passwd again. I think dovecot has some problem dealing with the pam_unix + pam_ldap configuration. Do you have any idea? I am Cc-ing this message to the corresponding bug in Debian BTS. -- Regards, Alan

2 2

[Dovecot] Bit of a Newbie Question
by Jud 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Apologies in advance - I'm sure there's something quite obvious I'm not doing correctly, but since I'm unable to resolve the problem myself.... I've installed Dovecot 99.14 on FreeBSD-CURRENT using the Dovecot FreeBSD port. My "network" consists of a cable modem connected to a router which is in turn connected (only) to my computer. My ISP assigns a dynamic IP address. I have ddclient set up to sync the dynamic IP to my hostname and MX via dyndns.org. Local operations (local delivery via Postfix or copying/moving/deleting with Thunderbird) work fine. Mail delivery from remote machines does not seem to work via either IMAP or IMAP-SSL. (That is, test e-mails I send from this [Fastmail] account to my local IMAP server never reach their destination.) Enabling port forwarding on my router for ports 993 and 143 has made no difference. What should I be doing to make this work correctly? Jud

5 7

[Dovecot] Strange behaviour with moving mail
by Remy Zandwijk 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Hi All, Sorry to bother you again. I am not too familiar with IMAP yet, so maybe I am asking stupid questions. Here goes anyway: In our (Dovecot 1.0-stable) setup, we have two namespaces: the default namespace, which location is '/var/mailstore/1%u/%u' and the "Mailstorage" namespace, which location is '~/.Mailstorage/'. Now we create a folder called 'Test' in the default namespace and the "Mailstorage" namespace. As far as I know this is possible and not a strange thing to do. When moving an email from the first 'Test' folder to the other 'Test' folder, it appears that everything works like expected, but when refreshing the mailbox, the message is still in the original folder. This happens with a number of different mailclients (which are configured with an empty namespace setting). I guess Dovecot doesn't look at the namespace in which the mail folder is. Is this a Dovecot bug or is this normal behaviour? Best regards, Remy B.T.W: When moving the mail, this is the IMAP conversation: 00029 UID COPY 4 TEST * 2 EXISTS * 2 RECENT 00029 OK Copy completed. 00030 UID STORE 4 +Flags.silent (\Deleted) 00030 OK Store completed.

2 3

[Dovecot] Is it possible to regenerate the index files?
by Joakim Verona 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Is it possible to regenerate the index files, on other conditions than the mbox file being read? For instance, it would be nice if I could regenerate the index for a specific mbox whenever procmail delivers mail to it. If theres no existing solution, would it be possible to make a small script with something like "nc" that could send an imap command to dovecot, so that dovecot would rebuild its index for that mbox? If so, which imap command triggers an index rebuild? -- Joakim Verona www.verona.se

2 5

[Dovecot] Visibility of .subscriptions and .customflags
by justin 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Hi, I upgraded to test65 from 0.99 (mostly to get the namespace feature) and now it seems my .subscriptions and .customflags are showing up as mail folders in my IMAP client (Eudora). If I try and open those folders, of course I get an error. How can I configure dovecot so that these aren't displayed to my IMAP client? I looked through about 6 months of acrhives and couldn't find it mentioned anywhere. Thanks.

2 1

[Dovecot] logging
by F. Even 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

I'm curious about exactly what this means in my log: Mar 13 10:56:20 cerebus dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected [130.94.242.20] Mar 13 10:56:51 cerebus last message repeated 177 times Mar 13 10:57:32 cerebus last message repeated 179 times Now...does Dovecot ONLY log the names of users on successful attempts? Is this "Disconnected" log entry an indication someone ran a username/password attack against the imap server and failed to authenticate? If so, is there any way to make this a little more verbose, so I can perhaps see what names, etc. the annoying idiot is throwing against my server....? Thanks.

2 1

[Dovecot] (no subject)
by Gabriel Granger 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Hi All, Bit the bullet last night and switched off UW-IMAP and turned on Dovecot. With any migration I've got some teething problems and hoping someone might be able to point me in the right direction. I tested the system using apple's Mail.app which worked fine, no problems at all, but it seems that most of my users are getting problems, i suspect Mail.app is hiding these messages from me. All my users are using ThunderBird 1.0 lastest stable release. Some messages in their IMAP folders are producing the following error. The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Error in IMAP command UID: Invalid BODY[_] parameter: Missing '>' in '<16384.-14781>'. it occurs on the same messages in the users email client but happens randomly, it does not stop you from viewing the message, its just pops up with this error. I'm current using IMAP over SSL and using mbox not maildir for IMAP Any ideas or hep would be great as I'd rather not have to roll back out to UW-IMAP Gabe

6 16

Re: [Dovecot] aha! (was apple mail vs. v0.99)
by sean finney 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

hey timo, On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:32:35PM +0200, dovecot-request(a)dovecot.org wrote: > From: Timo Sirainen <tss(a)iki.fi> > > i set: > > > > mailbox_check_interval = 0 > > This has been the default since 0.99.5 which was released over 2 years > ago. How old version are you using? :) Or had you changed the default? i had indeed changed the default, thinking that it would be a nice feature to turn on. when the problem first surfaced, i immediately thought of this option. however, since the problem was that applemail wasn't seing the new mail, and this was an option to notify the client that there *was* new mail, i guess common sense got the better of me and i forgot this was something i had changed... > > mailbox_idle_check_interval = 0 > > This shouldn't matter because OSX Mail doesn't use IDLE. Probably better > idea to turn it back on or clients using IDLE don't see new mails (I > think?) aha. well then i'll have to try turning that back on :) thanks, sean

1 0