- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Darwin Build (cvs)
by Jesse Peterson 09 Oct '03

09 Oct '03

Oops, I apologize for my short, breif message that didn't even include what I said it should inlcude =). Here's the deal: OpenDarwin 6.6 (closest relative being Mac OS X 10.2.6) won't build from CVS. Specifically libtoolize doesn't seem to exist (does it even come with libtool?) and the other parts of the "autogen.sh" fail miserably. This time (really) attached is a gzip of the log of autogen.sh: "./autogen.sh >& autogen.log". Thanks for any help! - Jesse

2 1

[Dovecot]
by Jesse Peterson 08 Oct '03

08 Oct '03

% uname -a Darwin xxx 6.6 Darwin Kernel Version 6.6: Sun Jul 6 05:12:51 PDT 2003; root:tmp/xnu-6.6.2-4-root.obj/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc Attached is a gzipped "sh autogen.sh >& autogen.log" for the above machine. What do you think? Jesse Peterson <jesse(a)mactechs.com> Office 206.441.7443 / Fax 206.441.8078 MacTechs / Macintosh System and Network Support 2121 First Avenue, Suite 103 / Seattle, Washington 98121 http://www.mactechs.com/

1 0

[Dovecot] those assertions
by dovecot＠spam.turbolink.net 06 Oct '03

06 Oct '03

Timo, Just FYI while you're working on the mbox code, I discovered a bug that occasionally causes dovecot to insert a single blank line at the beginning of the mbox, I'm not sure when/how/why. A single blank line seems to really confuse dovecot, and causes the server to crash when somebody connects to an afflicted mbox. ("Error indexing mbox" in the log, and disconects the user right away). I fixed it with lots of ugly code at our site (basically just remember that we skipped an intial blank line when doing other operations, instead of skipping it then forgetting later). I suspect there's a more elegant way to do it. - Mike

1 0

[Dovecot] SSL Client Certificate Support
by Bert Koelewijn 06 Oct '03

06 Oct '03

Dear Timo, most modern enterprises make use of a Public Key Infrastructure. It would be nice to have dovecot check a client certificate instead of a password. This makes life much easier and more secure. Mail clients like Mozilla and MS Outlook do support this. What do you think of the following feature request: - Client authenticates with a certificate via SSL. (Like stunnel can) - Dovecot looks the username up in a table with (public key, username) - The mailclient gives a name and password, but dovecot ignores them - Dovecot gives the client access by the username found in the table This way existing mail clients can use this system and you can save your username with an empty password. Best Regards, Bert Koelewijn

5 10

[Dovecot] those assertions
by Bernard Blackham 05 Oct '03

05 Oct '03

Hi, I did a bit of digging into the assertions from mbox-rewrite.c (hdr_parsed_size.physical_size == hdr_size). Every time it happens, hdr_size is 0, while hdr_parsed_size.physical_size is non-zero (presumably the correct value). Does this help track it down? I can't manage to get hold of an mbox that causes this though. Another infrequent assertion that's popped up: file message-address.c: line 262 (message_address_write): assertion failed: (addr->domain != NULL) And one that's only ever been spotted once in the last few weeks: file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) I'm waiting for them to happen again to provide some more info... Regards, Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham bernard at blackham dot com dot au

2 1

[Dovecot] another Dovecot problem
by Tim Miller 05 Oct '03

05 Oct '03

Hi All-- First, thanks to Timo for solving my last issue. I got dovecot up and running on one of my machines, and it does exactly what I want. Now I'm trying to install dovecot on an older box (glibc 2.0.7 Linux kernel 2.0.36), and encountering some problems: -- firstly autoconf/automake does not seem to correctly deal with the madvise function on this system. It detects that we don't have madvise, yet it's prototyped in /usr/include/sys/mman.h. This causes the compilation to fail when dovecot tries to redefine this function. -- I attempted to solve this problem by renaming the function dovecot prototypes to dc_madvise and then changed all the calls in the code (and the implementation) from madvise to dc_madvise. This allows the code to compile correctly. -- However, once the server is installed, it does not appear to work correctly. I can login, but when I try to list my folders or select any folder (one that exists or one that doesn't exist) the connection times out and the following entry is written to the log file: dovecot: Oct 03 05:38:56 Error: login: received another "not listening" notification (if you can't login at all, see src/lib/fdpass.c) I tracked this message down in the source, but didn't see any obvious way to trace back the problem. Does anyone have experience building on this older configuration (the glibc is a Red Hat version, if it makes any difference)? Any ideas on what might be causing this issue? Best, Tim Miller

2 5

mbox/maildir/directories [was: Re: [Dovecot] still getting weird .{inbox} folder creations with latest -test7]
by Miquel van Smoorenburg 05 Oct '03

05 Oct '03

This is a bit of a late reply, but still: On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:06, Timo Sirainen wrote: > CVS has been optimized to assume all files beginning with a dot (except > .subscriptions currently) are mailboxes. This is faster since it doesn't > have to stat() each file to figure out if it's a directory or not. > Perhaps that should be optional. New Linux systems (maybe others too) > wouldn't actually even need the stat().. > > I'll probably some day also add support for dotless directory-structured > mailbox locations, but it's not really high priority. Well, on our systems the mailbox is in /var/mail in maildir format, and in ~/Mail users have split up their folders in subdirs, in mixed maildir and mbox formats. So if dovecot could support both dotless directory-structured mailbox locations and maildir/mbox mix-n-match in the same tree, that would be excellent for us. Mbox is a better format for archiving. Now if Dovecot could also access (read-only ofcourse) compressed mbox archives ... Food for thought. Just put it on the wishlist ;) Mike.

2 1

[Dovecot] Patches
by Jaldhar H. Vyas 05 Oct '03

05 Oct '03

As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following patches: * segfault when user home directory is empty * Proper PAM service name * Make suid work on 2.6 kernels Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a 0.99.11 soon? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar(a)debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/

5 4

[Dovecot] Why does dovecot confuse mutt?
by Amelia A Lewis 04 Oct '03

04 Oct '03

Heylas, I just switched my primary mail server from courier imap to dovecot (I've been waiting to do this; dovecot showed up in debian testing for alpha, at last). So, using the same set of maildirs, there are slightly different behaviors. First, of course, dovecot displays the hierarchy as I thought it ought to be, such that INBOX is a sibling of all other top-level boxes, not the parent of everything. This is A Good Thing[tm]. That works as expected. However, as far as mutt is concerned, *every* mailbox has child folders. My muttrc contains the line: set folder=imap://localhost/. (and the home folder is set to imap://localhost/INBOX; the idea is to do all mail munging through the server, never directly touching the maildirs with an MUA). Oh, and I'm using maildir (~/Maildir). In mutt, from the currently-selected mailbox, one can use 'c' to change boxes, and ? displays a navigable folder hierarchy. If a folder contains only mail (no child folders), it shows up as "FolderName", if it has child folders (whether or not it has mail), it shows up as "FolderName.". You can display the mail in a folder that has child folders, but it requires a different keystroke than the default (enter selects a folder, which means showing child folders if there are any, showing mail if there aren't; to display mail in a folder that has child folders, space). This is tripping me up a little, because of course the commands are mostly bred into my fingertips, and it's a difficult adjustment. I hit return, and I see a folder that contains the "child" folder "../". Is this a glitch in mutt's handling of information that I ought to report to mutt maintainers? Is it a glitch in dovecot's presentation of information that I ought to report to ... err, well. *laugh* My other primary mail client seems to cope beautifully with the information that's supplied (sylpheed, if it matters). But then, sylpheed also coped perfectly when courier was supplying information. I gather that courier and dovecot are reporting something slightly different, somehow, but I don't really know what, and I don't know which should be considered "correct". Amy!

5 5

[Dovecot] mailbox sorting issue
by Paul 04 Oct '03

04 Oct '03

Thanks for the "junk at end" help. Now I'm having one more perplexing issue: When I sort a Dovecot mbox in Pine, the most recent messages tend to linger near the bottom of the message list, regardless of how they're sorted. Here's a snippet of the bottom of the list, sorted by arrival time: 448 2003-09-24 20:31 sprightly@e... Re: *hoopoe 449 2003-09-24 21:05 mlescaut@w... Re: yes! 450 2003-09-24 23:57 jackulysses@y... Re: oh my lord 451 2003-09-25 01:43 sprightly@e... attachments==take a look 452 2003-09-25 01:29 avantguild@m... Your Membership is Almost Up 453 2003-09-25 10:40 heidi@p... xhtml 454 2003-09-25 11:04 dembo@s. Re: bridge 455 2003-09-25 11:54 JKesner@m... Bombay 456 2003-09-25 12:05 cm2144@c... Re: bridge at linda's And here is a snippet of the same mbox list, sorted by From address: 449 2003-09-25 01:43 sprightly@e... attachments==take a look 450 2003-09-10 16:06 staff@c... Tribute in Light Shines 451 2003-09-08 18:44 starpiekat@y... Re: Sorry! 452 2003-09-23 22:01 starry@p... but... 453 2003-09-25 12:05 cm2144@c... Re: bridge at linda's 454 2003-09-17 17:07 wahrman@s... RE: bridge etc. 455 2003-09-19 13:11 wahrman@s... RE: bridge etc. 456 2003-09-15 23:39 waycross@u... waycross - the eagle Notice that message from cm2144 in both lists, way out of order in the second! I'm not 100% sure that this is a Dovecot issue, but I suspect it is, since this doesn't happen if I open the same mailbox locally or with UW-IMAP. I know that Pine makes use of IMAP server-based sorting if it is available. I tried deleting .imap-index* files, just in case, but that didn't help. thanks, Paul

3 2