- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] "mail process isn't allowed for root" error
by Spectron International, Inc. 24 Jun '03

24 Jun '03

What does the "mail process isn't allowed for root" error means? How can I fix it? Faw

4 5

[Dovecot] Dovecot-request = Become The Man That Women Desirelicensable
by gtimes229699＠hairdresser.net 24 Jun '03

24 Jun '03

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Dovecot-request = Become The Man That Women Desirelicensablefrolic MALE ORGAN ENLARGEMENT And Pleasure Enhancements [...] Content analysis details: (14.80 points, 5 required) X_PRIORITY_HIGH (1.9 points) Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high NO_REAL_NAME (0.8 points) From: does not include a real name FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS (0.7 points) From: ends in numbers PENIS_ENLARGE2 (1.3 points) BODY: Information on getting a larger penis or breasts (2) PENIS_ENLARGE (1.4 points) BODY: Information on getting a larger penis or breasts BANG_GUARANTEE (0.5 points) BODY: Something is emphatically guaranteed HTML_FONT_COLOR_GRAY (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is gray HTML_MESSAGE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message HTML_FONT_COLOR_GREEN (0.8 points) BODY: HTML font color is green HTML_FONT_BIG (0.3 points) BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color not within safe 6x6x6 palette HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY (0.1 points) BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is blue HTML_70_80 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML MIME_LONG_LINE_QP (0.2 points) RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 characters MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET (0.8 points) RAW: Message text in HTML without specified charset USERPASS (1.5 points) URI: URL contains username and (optional) password REMOVE_PAGE (0.3 points) URI: URL of page called "remove" HTTP_USERNAME_USED (0.7 points) URI: Uses a username in a URL RCVD_IN_RFCI (1.4 points) RBL: Received via a relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org [RBL check: found 224.44.125.217.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6] MISSING_MIMEOLE (0.5 points) Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only has text/html MIME parts MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME (0.6 points) Message looks like Outlook, but isn't The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

[Dovecot] can't compile on redhat 9
by Farkas Levente 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

hi, while the current cvs compile on redhat 8.0 on redhat 9 gives the following error: ---------------------------- checking whether va_lists can be copied by value... yes ./configure: line 14217: syntax error near unexpected token `SSL,' ./configure: line 14217: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(SSL, openssl)' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.84419 (%build) ---------------------------- any tip what can be the reason? thanks. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 3

[Dovecot] starting with daemontools
by Jens Gutzeit 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

Hi all, I want to start dovecot through DJBs Daemontools-supervise, is there a configuration option that lets dovecot stay in foreground? best regards, Jens

3 3

[Dovecot] newbie question: alias addresses
by R.Charles Sweeten 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

Hello! I looked through the mail archives but did not see how to set up alias addresses. Could someone please put me on the right road. How do I create/implement aliases? and group aliases? Thanks! ~rick........... "There is no spoon. .....<gun-shot>...."

3 3

[Dovecot] new pkgsrc on NetBSD
by tom 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

hi all, just updated the pkgsrc to build dovecot-0.99.10-rc2, see http://news.gw.com/netbsd.pkgsrc.changes/27698 for reference. best regards, TOM

1 0

[Dovecot] strange problem
by tom hensel 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

hi, running dovecot-0.99.10-rc2 on NetBSD, client is Entourage on MacOS 9.2. sylpheed on NetBSD does not show this behaviour. --snip-- Jun 23 16:28:15 host imap(user): file mail-index.c: line 619 (mail_index_lookup_uid_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0 && last_uid > 0) --snap-- any hints? thanks, TOM

2 1

[Dovecot] RFC: PAM service name change?
by Jeremy Katz 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service name not be imap. Especially as the same service name is used for pop as well :) My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead. Any other opinions? Jeremy

3 3

[Dovecot] 0.99.10-rc1
by Timo Sirainen 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

Home again. Fixed SSL checking for Redhat 9, I hope. Could someone test if it actually works now? Also fixed a few compiler warnings. If this thing works, I'll just update the NEWS file and call it 0.99.10. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/ Near future plans include rewriting parts of index handling. At least .tree file will go, I've a _much_ better idea how to replace it. .data file is also too bloaty and it's a bit difficult to add new fields into it. I'd have to figure out some better API to access it. I've also been worrying about locking.. If we want to share indexes between many clients, lock contention will become a problem. For example a "FETCH 1:* BODY[]" could take a long time and index can't be modified while it's being done. I'm not really sure what to do about this.. Probably some more fine graned locking and maybe some kind of transaction log where changes are written if you couldn't get exclusive lock.

3 5

[Dovecot] Dovecot and LDAP problems
by Spectron International, Inc. 22 Jun '03

22 Jun '03

I'm having problems with dovecot and OpenLDAP. I installed both, and configured both. /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf exists and I modified dovecot.conf to have... auth_userdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf auth_passdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf ...but the log displays the following: Jun 19 13:59:15 backup dovecot-auth: Unknown userdb type 'ldap' Jun 19 13:59:15 backup dovecot: Auth process died too early - shutting down Jun 19 13:59:15 backup dovecot: child 4187 (auth) returned error 89 the auth_userdb and auth_passdb seem to be ok, so what am I missing? Faw

4 5

[Dovecot] Bug?
by Steve Gare 20 Jun '03

20 Jun '03

Hi, Been using Dovecot for a few weeks now, must say it's very good.. I've been looking for a 'drop in' replacement for UWImap for ages! :) but just recently It's been giving me a few problem, I haven't tracked down exactly what causes the problem yet (I'm using Apple Mail on OS X 10.2.6) but after a good mail session it keep trying to log in over and over again.. Looking the the log file I find this... Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron imap-login: Login: sgare [IP REMOVED] Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron imap(sgare): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 263 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron dovecot: child 6329 (imap) killed with signal 6 Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron imap-login: Login: sgare [IP REMOVED] Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron imap(sgare): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 263 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron dovecot: child 6331 (imap) killed with signal 6 Jun 20 15:38:02 neuron imap-login: Login: sgare [IP REMOVED] Jun 20 15:38:03 neuron imap(sgare): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 263 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) Jun 20 15:38:03 neuron dovecot: child 6332 (imap) killed with signal 6 Jun 20 15:38:03 neuron imap-login: Login: sgare [IP REMOVED] Jun 20 15:38:03 neuron imap(sgare): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 263 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) Jun 20 15:38:03 neuron dovecot: child 6333 (imap) killed with signal 6 Jun 20 15:38:03 neuron imap-login: Login: sgare [IP REMOVED] Cheers, Steve Gare - Xantara.Net -- 0845 123 5707

2 2

[Dovecot] NetBSD pkgsrc maintanance
by tom hensel 20 Jun '03

20 Jun '03

hi all, i've taken over the maintainership of dovecot's pkgsrc on NetBSD - please send me your ideas, questions and comments related to dovecot on NetBSD. FreeBSD's port has currently some more 'features' than the pkgsrc, i'm going to add some of them - any feedback is appreciated. bye, TOM

3 2

[Dovecot] Re: dovecot Digest, Vol 2, Issue 15
by ohp＠pyrenet.fr 19 Jun '03

19 Jun '03

> >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:21:08 +0200 (CEST) >From: Andreas Aardal Hanssen <dovecot(a)andreas.hanssen.name> >Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Multiple auth howto >To: Dovecot mailing list <dovecot(a)procontrol.fi> >Message-ID: > <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306181319060.29812-100000(a)shusaku.troll.no> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > >On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 ohp(a)pyrenet.fr wrote: >>> Well, short answer: You can't. Put them all to one place (eg. pgsql), >>> maybe using some automated scripts. I don't know if I should even >>> consider about supporting fallbacking.. >>Hi Timo, Thanks for your answer. >>The reason I came to dovcot is that I thought it was possible. I've benn >>researching this for weeks now. First thought that cyrus would do that, it >>does but though SASL and pam whitch I don't have. >>How difficult would it be to implement a fallback? > >Does this tool do what you want? (checkpassword only though, but I bet you >will find checkpassword compatible authenticators that suit your needs): > >http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/software/multichkpwds.c It surely is interesting bu I'd rather see modules inside the server, see below > >-- >Andreas Aardal Hanssen > > > >------------------------------ >Message: 4 >Date: 18 Jun 2003 15:31:36 +0300 >From: Timo Sirainen <tss(a)iki.fi> >Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Multiple auth howto >To: dovecot(a)procontrol.fi >Message-ID: <1055939496.10262.163.camel@hurina> >Content-Type: text/plain > >On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 14:05, ohp(a)pyrenet.fr wrote: >> > Well, short answer: You can't. Put them all to one place (eg. pgsql), >> > maybe using some automated scripts. I don't know if I should even >> > consider about supporting fallbacking.. >> > >> > >> Hi Timo, Thanks for your answer. >> The reason I came to dovcot is that I thought it was possible. I've benn >> researching this for weeks now. First thought that cyrus would do that, it >> does but though SASL and pam whitch I don't have. >> >> How difficult would it be to implement a fallback? > >Not very. I'm mostly concerned about what happens if the user exists in >both authenticators. I guess normally this shouldn't happen, but you >can't really guarantee that and mistakes happen.. Yes mistakes happen. Why could'nt you (we?) do like proftpd that has a parameter that give the order of authenticators first one wins. That way you could even have the same user as a real and virtual account with differents passwords > >If fallbacking happened only when user isn't found from first >authenticator, that could work a bit more safely, but I'm not sure if I >can know with PAM if check failed because user wasn't found or because >password didn't match. I don't know either. My idea is to get rid of PAM for that's although fantastic on the paper is a Linux thing that I can't even compile here. Regards -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp(a)pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

1 0

[Dovecot] \0\n at end of lines
by Mike Grupenhoff 19 Jun '03

19 Jun '03

Since upgrading to -test11, mail fetched from imap has every line terminated with a nul and a newline ("\0\n"). This also happens with -test12. It seems to happen with both mbox and maildir. I'm running on NetBSD/sparc (NetBSD-current as of April 1, 1.6Q). If it matters, I have "mail_save_crlf" set to "no" and "mail_read_mmaped" also set to "no". I can't find any other options that look like they could be relevant. Any ideas? Thanks, mike

2 1

[Dovecot] 0.99.10-test12
by Timo Sirainen 19 Jun '03

19 Jun '03

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ I should have released 0.99.10 already I think.. There's just two annoying problems that I think should be fixed first: - PAM: If user gives a wrong password, dovecot-auth process sleeps for two seconds, blocking everyone else who are trying to authenticate at the time. So using PAM isn't very good idea at the moment. - OpenSSL problems. Are they really my fault? I have no idea what I could be doing wrong. Maybe some compile option is wrong? Also I should try to use pkg-config to get compile flags if it exists in configure. The new things in -test12 then: - We sync mailbox less often. Only NOOP and CHECK will force a mailbox sync now. Other commands do it also but only if mailbox hasn't been synced in last 5 seconds. Maybe this reduces some I/O. At least a bit less stat() calls :) - Dirty maildir flag flushing work now. Meaning that if you change message flags but rename() fails because you're out of quota, the flags are changed in index file and dirty-flag is set. Once in a while it tries to flush the dirty flags by rename()ing the file again. - IMAP RFC requires that NUL characters are never sent to client. We do now the same as UW-IMAP by sending ascii 128 chars instead.

5 11

[Dovecot] 0.99.10-test13
by Timo Sirainen 18 Jun '03

18 Jun '03

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ - Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :) - We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12). So, what's left is to make PAM work well..

4 3

[Dovecot] Multiple auth howto
by ohp＠pyrenet.fr 18 Jun '03

18 Jun '03

Howdi. I'm new to dovcot (just succeded in compiling on unixware 713 today) I'm noww configuring for tests on other port. The sample configuration file is pretty well documented, however, I don't understand how I can firstt authenticate against passwd/shadow if not found against pgsql. What's the syntax? Please cc responses as I'm subscribed to digest TIA Reghards -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp(a)pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

3 4

[Dovecot] imaps now works!
by Farkas Levente 18 Jun '03

18 Jun '03

thanks! -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

1 0

[Dovecot] SASL Support
by Ken Crain 16 Jun '03

16 Jun '03

I need to support Outlook/Outlook Express users of Sendmail with SMTP Authorization. From what I can see, the LOGIN method available in Outlook/Outlook Express is the only applicable way to go at this time. It appears it is not supported in Dovecot right now. Is this correct and, if so, how would I go about adding this support?

2 1

[Dovecot] crash on LIST command
by Wouter Van Hemel 16 Jun '03

16 Jun '03

Hello, I'm experiencing a reproducable crash in the imap daemon of dovecot 0.99.9.1 when running the next commands (sniffed from a sylpheed session): [cocaine:~] telnet ice 143 Trying 192.168.196.1... Connected to ice. Escape character is '^]'. * OK dovecot ready. 1 NOOP 1 OK NOOP completed. 2 LOGIN wouter password 2 OK Logged in. 3 NAMESPACE 3 BAD Error in IMAP command: Unknown command 'NAMESPACE' 4 LIST "" "" * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 4 OK List completed. 5 LIST "" "%" Connection closed by foreign host. [cocaine:~] _ The log shows this: Jun 16 02:48:09 ice imap-login: Login: wouter [192.168.196.5] Jun 16 02:48:19 ice dovecot: child 1870 (imap) killed with signal 11 Looks like a segfault. [...] Core was generated by `imap'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.4...done. Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. #0 0x8058469 in mbox_list_inbox (ctx=0x8098080) at mbox-list.c:333 333 if (ctx->dir->virtual_path != NULL) (gdb) bt #0 0x8058469 in mbox_list_inbox (ctx=0x8098080) at mbox-list.c:333 #1 0x805809e in mbox_list_mailbox_next (ctx=0x8098080) at mbox-list.c:193 #2 0x804b75a in list_unsorted (client=0x8096080, ctx=0x8098080, reply=0x807ed06 "LIST", sep=0xbfbffac4 "/", listext=0) at cmd-list.c:234 #3 0x804b9fa in _cmd_list_full (client=0x8096080, lsub=0) at cmd-list.c:341 #4 0x804ba8b in cmd_list (client=0x8096080) at cmd-list.c:365 #5 0x804d39e in client_handle_input (client=0x8096080) at client.c:306 #6 0x804d43d in _client_input (context=0x8096080) at client.c:342 #7 0x8078c87 in io_loop_handler_run (ioloop=0x808d060) at ioloop-poll.c:210 #8 0x8078745 in io_loop_run (ioloop=0x808d060) at ioloop.c:295 #9 0x80524a9 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbffc2c, envp=0xbfbffc34) at main.c:166 #10 0x8049eb5 in _start () (gdb) _ This crash happens when adding an imap account to the sylpheed mailer. I also noticed other problematic log entries, which might or might not be related: Jun 16 00:28:36 ice imap-login: Login: wouter [192.168.196.5] Jun 16 00:28:36 ice imap(wouter): open() failed with file /usr/home/wouter/.mail/.imap/INBOX/.customflags: No such file or directory Jun 16 00:28:36 ice imap(wouter): Can't create temp index /usr/home/wouter/.mail/.imap/INBOX/.temp.hostname.domainname.tld.1728: No such file or directory ... this happens when an imap user connects and opens his/her INBOX for the first time, and the /usr/home/username/.mail/ directory doesn't exist yet. My DEFAULT_MAIL_ENV settings: #default_mail_env = mbox:~/.mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u default_mail_env = mbox:/usr/home/%u/.mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u (tried both) Manually adding the ~/.mail directory with mkdir takes care of the problem, but shouldn't this directory be created automatically when it doesn't exist? I can't expect every user to log in and first make this mail directory before they can use their mail account. Dovecot also refuses to show any folders at all, such as the INBOX, when it can't find it's mail(folders) directory. Is this intentional? Dovecot is running on a pretty standard (i386) FreeBSD 4.4 test machine with postfix and normal mbox-formatted inbox files. Thanks for any suggestions, wouter

3 6

[Dovecot] Dovecot will not run on secure kernel.
by Ola Garstad 16 Jun '03

16 Jun '03

I am trying to run Dovecot on RH 7.3 with Linux kernel 2.4.20 + GrSecurity patch. I downloaded the RPM yesterday and installed it. When I start Dovecot the kernel reports: kernel: grsec: From 192.168.1.22: attempt to overstep process limit by (dovecot:14491) UID(0) EUID(0), parent (dovecot:23872) UID(0) EUID(0) I have never seen this problem in the 3 years I have used GrSecurity together with a lot of programs. GrSecurity explains: "Enforce RLIMIT_NPROC on execs. Users with a resource limit on processes will have the value checked during execve() calls. The current system only checks the system limit during fork() calls." Any ideas why Dovecot causes this problem? -- Ola

2 1

[Dovecot] more newline related errors
by Mike Brown 16 Jun '03

16 Jun '03

Should I be concerned about these errors? imap(msun): Jun 13 13:21:38 Error: Error indexing mbox file /home/msun/mail/Deleted Messages: LF not found where expected imap(msun): Jun 13 13:39:08 Error: Corrupted binary tree for index /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index: lookup returned index outside range (1 >= 0) imap(msun): Jun 13 13:44:07 Error: IndexID mismatch for binary tree file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree imap(msun): Jun 13 13:44:07 Error: IndexID mismatch for binary tree file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree imap(msun): Jun 13 13:44:07 Error: IndexID mismatch for modify log file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.log imap(msun): Jun 14 12:07:42 Error: Error indexing mbox file /home/msun/Mailbox: LF not found where expected imap(msun): Jun 14 12:08:27 Error: Corrupted index file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index: Sequence 1 not found from binary tree (1 msgs says header) imap(msun): Jun 14 12:08:27 Error: Corrupted index file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index: Sequence 1 not found from binary tree (1 msgs says header) imap(msun): Jun 14 12:08:27 Error: Corrupted index file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index: Sequence 1 not found from binary tree (1 msgs says header) imap(msun): Jun 14 12:14:23 Error: IndexID mismatch for binary tree file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree imap(msun): Jun 14 12:14:23 Error: IndexID mismatch for binary tree file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree imap(msun): Jun 14 12:14:23 Error: IndexID mismatch for modify log file /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.log imap(msun): Jun 15 11:34:58 Error: Error indexing mbox file /home/msun/Mailbox: LF not found where expected There was a patch required for the POP3 server to read mbox files that did not precede "From " lines with a blank line. Perhaps this is related? Thanks

3 2

[Dovecot] bug in search? (fwd)
by Mark E. Mallett 14 Jun '03

14 Jun '03

I received this report and am passing it along.. mm > If all messages are marked for deletion, the following command returns > an empty list: > SEARCH DELETED > If all messages BUT one are marked for deletion the same command returns > a list of every message but one. > > If parens are used it works fine. > SEARCH (DELETED)

2 1

[Dovecot] Deleting NFS-mounted Maildir subfolders fails
by Christian Ehrhardt 14 Jun '03

14 Jun '03

Hi, [ please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list ] I'm using dovecot-99.9.1 with a little hack to get authentication to work the way we want it. The server is running on a Solaris 9 host and user homes are mounted via NFS from a Solaris 8 server (Version doesn't seem to matter). Almost everything's fine but I can't delete maildir subfolders if these reside on a non local NFS-directory. The reason given is that the directory isn't empty and hence can't be deleted. Most likely the following happens: dovecot has the index file and other stuff in the maildir subfolder opened via NFS. When the delete request comes in dovecot deletes these files but doesn't close them. On normal unix file systems this is no Problem but with Solaris NFS these file's aren't actually deleted until they are (explicitly or implicitly) closed. Instead they are renamed to .nfs.<some digits>. These files will automatically vanish once they are closed. However, as long as they exist it is impossible to delete the directory where these files reside and rmdir fails. This is not a big deal and one may argue that dovecot is fine and the NFS implementation is in error. However, it would be cool if dovecot could atttempt to close all administrative files before it deletes them (or at least before it tries to delete the directory where these files reside). regards Christian Ehrhardt -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS!

2 1

[Dovecot] Folder creation errors
by Mark E. Mallett 14 Jun '03

14 Jun '03

Hi- In a mbox environment: 1 login username password 1 OK Logged in. 2 create "slar" 2 NO Internal error [2003-06-11 15:44:56] 3 create "/slar" 3 NO Invalid mailbox name: /slar 4 create "Mail/slar" 4 OK Create completed. 5 create "./slar" 5 OK Create completed. 6 create "blar" 6 NO Internal error [2003-06-11 15:46:54] 7 logout * BYE Logging out 7 OK Logout completed. i.e. I get "internal error" if there is no path component in the folder name. Is this a problem? I would guess that "internal error" is always a problem :-) mm

2 3