- dovecot - dovecot.org

Exclude folders from fts xapian on a per-user basis
by Adam Kessel 21 Jul '23

21 Jul '23

Is there any way for a user to specify folders they want excluded from fts xapian indexing? Or can this only be done globally in /etc?

1 0

Dovecot pigeon/sieve and SELinux
by Graham Leggett 21 Jul '23

21 Jul '23

Hi all, I am in the process of migrating a dovecot installation from RHEL8 to RHEL9, this time round I am trying to get everything to work in selinux enforcing mode. First error I am stuck on is as follows: Error: sieve: file storage: Failed to stat sieve storage path: stat(/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/vacation.sieve) failed: Permission denied (euid=377(vmail) egid=376(vmail) missing +x perm: /var/lib/dovecot, we're not in group 97(dovecot), dir owned by 97:97 mode=0750) It appears that the vmail user cannot access /var/lib/dovecot, because under RHEL9 the permissions are hidden to the world. [root@seawitch dovecot]# ls -al /var/lib/dovecot total 12 drwxr-x---. 3 dovecot dovecot 36 Jul 21 17:51 . Am I correct in interpreting the error message as meaning that /var/lib/dovecot/sieve is not a correct directory for global sieve scripts, and they need to go somewhere else? If they do need to go somewhere else, in the world of enforcing selinux, where do they go? While dovecot-selinux is documented, sieve is not mentioned: https://linux.die.net/man/8/dovecot_selinux So, let’s work around the above error by adding the vmail user to the dovvecot group. Is this even a good idea? /usr/sbin/usermod -a -G dovecot vmail Now we hit the next error: Error: sieve: file storage: Failed to stat sieve storage path: stat(/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/vacation.sieve) failed: Permission denied (euid=380(vmail) egid=378(vmail) missing +w perm: /var/lib/dovecot/sieve/vacation.sieve stat(/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/vacation.sieve) failed: Permission denied, dir owned by 0:0 mode=0755) This error is weird. Dovecot is trying to open the original vacation.sieve source file for write - why? We have pre-compiled all the global sieve scripts: [root@marcopolo ~]# ls -al /var/lib/dovecot/sieve/ total 36 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Jul 21 17:29 . drwxr-x---. 3 dovecot dovecot 36 Jul 21 17:29 .. -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 284 Jul 21 08:47 junk.sieve -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 277 Jul 21 17:29 junk.svbin -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 316 Jul 21 08:47 report-ham.sieve -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 476 Jul 21 17:29 report-ham.svbin -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 201 Jul 21 08:47 report-spam.sieve -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 382 Jul 21 17:29 report-spam.svbin drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jul 21 08:47 sieve-execute drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jul 21 08:47 sieve-filter drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jul 21 08:47 sieve-pipe -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 309 Jul 21 08:47 vacation.sieve -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 558 Jul 21 17:29 vacation.svbin Is the error perhaps inaccurate, and it’s trying to open a temp file for write, failing (correctly, it has no business opening a temp file for write at this point), and then claiming the failure on the temp file is a failure on the source file? So to sum up: - In an SELinux world of Redhat, what directory do global sieve scripts go? - What permissions and selinux context are required on the global sieve scripts directory? Regards, Graham —

1 0

IMAP account can't save any email with attachment
by Chris Thomas 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

Hi, I'm getting a curious problem where if I write a draft without an attachment and click save. It'll work without any issue at all. But if I do the same, then attach a file to the email, it'll sit there for a couple of minutes before timing out (I'm using thunderbird), it'll eventually give you a message saying "Your draft message was not copied to your drafts folder (Drafts) due to network or file access errors." I've got all of dovecots verbose logging turned on. I'm using dovecot as a submission server through to the postfix server to do the actual sending. All the logging is turned on there too. But I can't figure out what the problem is. Is there anything I can look for in the logs that will help me out? chris

2 3

Re: Tons of imap-login processes despite client_limit very high
by Joseph Tam 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot%40dovecot.org/msg85850.html From: D D <pierre.alletru(a)gmail.com> > We're seeing a ton of imap-login processes running even when using high performance mode (https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/login_processes/#high-performance-mode) According to the docs: > > "process_min_avail should be set to be at least the number of CPU cores in the system, so that all of them will be used. Otherwise new processes are created only once an existing one’s connection count reaches client_limit" > > We have process_min_avail=4, client_limit=0 and default_client_limit=200000. So we'd expect seeing only 4 imap-login processes serving a ton of connections each. Yet, we see thousands of imap-login processes (more than half of all the imap processes): > ... > > Is having so many imap-login processes normal with our config? Did we misunderstand the docs or is there something wrong here? > > > default_client_limit = 1048576 > default_process_limit = 200000 > > service imap-login { > # client_limit = 0 # default is 0 > # process_limit = 0 # default is 0 > service_count = 100 This service limit might be your culprit. I wrote about the strange interaction between service_count and process_limit here: https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot%40dovecot.org/msg85850.html This gotcha should really be documented. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

3 4

Fatal error in http-client.c when passdb is oauth2 and userdb is sql
by Евгений Бахтин 19 Jul '23

19 Jul '23

5 5

-d ${user}@${nexthop} or -d ${recipient}?
by rixati6186＠iturchia.com 18 Jul '23

18 Jul '23

What's the differency between these two lines; 1- flags=DORhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f ${sender} -r ${recipient} -d ${user}@${nexthop} 2- flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f ${sender} -d ${recipient} and which one should I use, based on a setup like; Dovecot, Postfix, Postfixadmin, ManageSieve and virtual users hosted in SQL? Thanks in advance.

1 0

dovecot: lda(info@mydomain) - vacation action: discarding vacation response to mailinglist recipient?
by rixati6186＠iturchia.com 18 Jul '23

18 Jul '23

Hello, I'm trying to set auto reply for my email account, through Roundcube and ManageSieve plugin (the plugin itself and its regular filtering works fine), however the auto-reply doesn't arrive to the sender's inbox, when I tested it with sending an email to myself/my server, from my Gmail account, my maillog has a line, stating; Jul 18 15:28:06 mailsrv dovecot: lda(info(a)mywebsite.com)<44812><uikMAlaFtmQMrwAAI6rZ/g>: sieve: msgid=<CA+GnASfyKJDPB-K2uCvxaOL-XQQ7Uv=yJt7sgJSYm-YJzYJSfQ(a)mail.gmail.com>: vacation action: discarding vacation response to mailinglist recipient <mysendermail(a)gmail.com> Any idea would be much appreciated, thank you!

1 1

Re: Fatal error in http-client.c when passdb is oauth2 and userdb is sql
by Евгений Бахтин 18 Jul '23

18 Jul '23

2 1

Re: Fatal error in http-client.c when passdb is oauth2 and userdb is sql
by Евгений Бахтин 18 Jul '23

18 Jul '23

2 1

Tons of imap-login processes despite client_limit very high
by D D 18 Jul '23

18 Jul '23

Hi Dovecot community. We're seeing a ton of imap-login processes running even when using high performance mode (https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/login_processes/#high-performance-mode) According to the docs: "process_min_avail should be set to be at least the number of CPU cores in the system, so that all of them will be used. Otherwise new processes are created only once an existing one’s connection count reaches client_limit" We have process_min_avail=4, client_limit=0 and default_client_limit=200000. So we'd expect seeing only 4 imap-login processes serving a ton of connections each. Yet, we see thousands of imap-login processes (more than half of all the imap processes): $ ps aux | grep imap-login | wc -l 1278 $ ps aux | grep imap | wc -l 2154 We use verbose_proctitle=yes and a there seem to be 2 types of these processes, about half for a single IP and about half we suspect for multiple IPs: $ ps aux | grep imap-log _apt 1941081 0.0 0.0 10420 8700 ? S 14:57 0:00 dovecot/imap-login [84.115.232.178 TLS proxy] _apt 1941589 0.0 0.0 10532 8648 ? S 14:57 0:00 dovecot/imap-login [119.202.86.160 TLS proxy] _apt 1941789 0.0 0.0 10188 8620 ? S 14:57 0:00 dovecot/imap-login [0 pre-login + 2 TLS proxies] _apt 1942144 0.0 0.0 10716 8748 ? S 14:57 0:00 dovecot/imap-login [0 pre-login + 3 TLS proxies] _apt 1942428 0.0 0.0 10800 8712 ? S 14:57 0:00 dovecot/imap-login [5.41.100.37 TLS proxy] ... $ ps aux | grep imap-log | grep pre-login | wc -l 624 $ ps aux | grep imap-log | grep -v pre-login | wc -l 654 Is having so many imap-login processes normal with our config? Did we misunderstand the docs or is there something wrong here? default_client_limit = 1048576 default_process_limit = 200000 service imap-login { # client_limit = 0 # default is 0 # process_limit = 0 # default is 0 service_count = 100 process_min_avail = 4 vsz_limit = 2G inet_listener imap { } inet_listener imaps { haproxy = yes port = 994 } }

2 3

cram-md5, sasl and lua (inheriting technical debt)
by tknb8＠tunenet.dk 18 Jul '23

18 Jul '23

Hello, I am exploring the posibility of migrating an exsisting setup to postfix+dovecot. The issue being that many clients are currently configured for cram-md5 authentication. I am fully aware that this is a really, really, really bad idea, but re configuring all clients at once is not feasible with limited end user support resources. I have a setup running with LUA for the passdb, and everything works with PLAIN login. To keep compatibility with the PLAIN login mechanism i have tried to store {PLAIN} passwords in the DB, since proper secure password storage is incompatible with CRAM-MD5. My issue is that the LUA function auth_password_verify(req, pass) not even seems to be called for cram-md5 logins. Reading through the documentation also seems to indicate that the callenge is not passed to the LUA function making it impossible to compute the hash in LUA or the function req.password_verify(req, row.password, pass). Is my assumption correct that cram-md5 can not work with a LUA script ? Kind regards, Peter K.

2 1

Many IDLE imap processes but very few connections moved to imap-hibernate
by pierre.alletru＠gmail.com 17 Jul '23

17 Jul '23

Hi Dovecot community! I have a strange issue with imap-hibernate. Or more likely it behaves as it's supposed to and it's just that I don't really understand it. I have enabled it, and it works, but for some reason hibernation happens only to a tiny amount of connections, whereas I have a lot of IDLE imap processes. And I can't find any relevant errors in the logs. ## config ## mail_debug = yes verbose_proctitle = yes $ doveconf imap_hibernate_timeout imap_hibernate_timeout = 5 secs $ doveconf -a | grep -A 21 'service imap-hibernate' service imap-hibernate { chroot = client_limit = 0 drop_priv_before_exec = no executable = imap-hibernate extra_groups = group = idle_kill = 0 privileged_group = process_limit = 0 process_min_avail = 0 protocol = imap service_count = 0 type = unix_listener imap-hibernate { group = $default_internal_group mode = 0660 user = } user = $default_internal_user vsz_limit = 18446744073709551615 B } ## imap processes ## $ ps aux | grep "dovecot/imap" | wc -l 2214 ps aux | grep "dovecot/imap" | grep IDLE | wc -l 1258 $ ps aux | grep "imap-hibernate" syslog 1571453 0.0 0.0 4748 3156 ? S 15:44 0:00 dovecot/imap-hibernate [18 connections] As you can see here I have 1258 IDLE imap processes (out of 2214 in total), and only 18 connections in imap-hibernate. I'd like to have all IDLE processes to be moved to imap-hibernate in order to save up memory. Any idea why these 1k+ IDLE imap processes are not moved into imap-hibernate? Thank you!

2 1

Problem connecting with desktop client
by Wolfgang Paul Rauchholz 17 Jul '23

17 Jul '23

I run my home server under Rocky Linux 9. The server is modem / router and as such has two firewall interfaces; internal and external. Dovecot version is dovecot-2.3.16-8.el9.x86_64 kernel is: 5.14.0-284.18.1.el9_2.x86_64 My domain is wo-lar.com Postfix and Dovecot are up and running, and I can send and receive emails from CLI. But I cannot connect from desktop clients. I get the following error message: Server message: Can't connect to host "tcp://wo-lar.com:143" I tried to telnet from my desktop and server. Results are the same: - I always get a connection refused: telnet wo-lar.com 143 telnet / telnet <Server LAN IP> 143. On server only: telnet 127.0.0.1 143 - telnet wo-lar 143 (without .com!) establishes a connection [root@home wp.rauchholz]# telnet wo-lar 143 Trying 79.152.236.25... Connected to wo-lar. Escape character is '^]'. OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE LITERAL+ STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Dovecot ready. I went through all kinds for conf files and search for wo-lar string, but can't find it anywhere Where is the mistake hiding? Thanks for helping. Wolfgang

2 4

Re: Replication going away?
by William Edwards 16 Jul '23

16 Jul '23

> Op 16 jul. 2023 om 17:57 heeft Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi(a)open-xchange.com> het volgende geschreven: > > Hi! > > Yes, director and replicator are removed, and won't be available for pro users either. > > For NFS setups (or similar shared setups), we have documented a way to use Lua to run a director-like setup, see > > https://doc.dovecot.org/3.0/configuration_manual/howto/director_with_lua/ It would probably be good to share this link in the aforementioned Director removal thread. > > Regards to replication, doveadm sync is not being removed. So you can still run doveadm sync on your system to have a primary / backup setup. > > Aki > >> On 16/07/2023 18:34 EEST William Edwards via dovecot <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Top posting because nothing specific to reply to, sorry. Not exactly sure, but there’s another thread about the removal of Director in favour of Dovecot Pro on 3.x. Perhaps this change is related. >> >> William Edwards >> >>>> Op 16 jul. 2023 om 16:33 heeft Daniele <danix(a)kernel-panic.it> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Just like Vladimir, I'm a bit concerned about this change, and I'd really appreciate if someone could let us know if the replication feature (that works so well!) will be replaced or removed; and, in case of removal, what would be recommended replacement? >>> Thanks in advance and best regards, >>> Daniele >>> >>>> On 09-Jul-23 9:36 PM, Vladimir Mishonov via dovecot wrote: >>>> Hello everyone. >>>> >>>> Just saw this commit in the official Github repo: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/4c04e4c30fd4817a8b0e11d04d9681173f69… >>>> >>>> Looking at the commit details, it appears that it completely removes the replication feature. I'm a bit perplexed by this change and am not sure what might be the justification for it. Personally, I find replication to be very useful, as it allows me to maintain a synchronized mirror of all of my mailboxes on my home server, for use as backup in case the primary server goes down for some reason. >>>> >>>> Perhaps there's some sort of replacement being planned for this feature? Or maybe the relevant code is simply going to be refactored to a plugin or external program, and there's nothing to worry about at all? >>>> >>>> In any case, I'd greatly appreciate if one of the developers could comment on this change. >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org >

1 0

user lookup fails username is SHA256 @domain
by Daniel Botting 16 Jul '23

16 Jul '23

Hi all, I'm currently building a replacement personal mailserver on Debian 11 (hopefully upgrade it to 12 and it will continue to work). My existing personal mailserver is serving a handful of mailboxes for three domains, virtual users, on an older version of Debian. When I attempt to deliver mail to the server (using swaks) it is accepted by Exim and passed to lda, as per the logs below the lda is somehow seeing the CRYPT entry as if it was the local part? Output from syslog: Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: lda({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain)<700316><>: Debug: auth-master: userdb lookup({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain): Started userdb lookup Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: lda({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain)<700316><>: Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/run/dovecot/auth-userdb: Connecting Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: lda({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain)<700316><>: Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=700293,uid=0): Client connected (fd=9) Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: auth: Debug: master in: USER#0111#011{SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain#011service=lda Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: auth: Username character disallowed by auth_username_chars: 0x7b (username: {SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain) Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: auth: Debug: userdb out: NOTFOUND#0111 Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: lda({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain)<700316><>: Debug: auth-master: userdb lookup({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain): auth USER input: Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: lda({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain)<700316><>: Debug: auth-master: userdb lookup({SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha(a)example.domain): Userdb lookup failed Jul 16 09:50:02 imap2 dovecot: lda(700316): Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=700293,uid=0): Disconnected: Connection closed (fd=9) From what I've read 0x7b is hex for { so disallowed by auth_username_chars line is because of this problem. Doveconf -n output: # 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 5.10.0-21-amd64 x86_64 Debian 11.6 # Hostname: mailserver.fqdn auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_verbose = yes mail_debug = yes mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { args = /etc/vmail/%d/passwd driver = passwd-file } protocols = " imap" service auth { unix_listener auth-client { group = Debian-exim mode = 0660 } } service stats { unix_listener stats-reader { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } unix_listener stats-writer { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } } ssl = required ssl_cert = </path/to/cert.pem ssl_client_ca_dir = /etc/ssl/certs ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it userdb { args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/var/local/vmail/%d/%u driver = static } Example of line in passwd file: username:{SHA256-CRYPT}generated-sha I followed https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/simple_virtual_install/ before posting to ensure I hadn't missed something obvious. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Thanks Daniel

1 0

Windows 11 Outlook 365 and dovecot
by The Doctor 16 Jul '23

16 Jul '23

Are there any known Idssues? I help set up a client this morning using Win11 and Dovecot and the client cannot delete e-mail like he did previously. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor(a)nk.ca Ici doctor(a)nk.ca Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b We look outside to find assurance, and then we fail. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

3 2

Options to track performance?
by Christian 15 Jul '23

15 Jul '23

Hi there, after upgrading my dovecot on a bookworm container, I now have a weird delay when imap clients like Evolution connect the first time. Is there any performance logging configuration I could enable, to see what dovecot is doing in which timing? I suspect some timeout or delay somewhere, but unable to find it so far. Kind regards Chris

1 0

Options to track performance?
by Christian 15 Jul '23

15 Jul '23

Hi there, after upgrading my dovecot on a bookworm container, I now have a weird delay when imap clients like Evolution connect the first time. Is there any performance logging configuration I could enable, to see what dovecot is doing in which timing? I suspect some timeout or delay somewhere, but unable to find it so far. Kind regards Chris

1 0

dovecot and argonid
by Maciej Milaszewski 13 Jul '23

13 Jul '23

Hi For test I try use new auth (argonid) fot dovecot-2.3.20 I change only in sql: password: {ARGON2ID}........ in dovecot.conf i set default_vsz_limit = 2000 M and I can't auth Jul 12 15:07:43 dovecot8 dovecot: auth-worker(44928): conn unix:auth-worker (pid=23437,uid=114): auth-worker<4772376>: sql(user12,xxx.xxx.xxx.12,<VfN04EkA0LUK>): Password mismatch Jul 12 15:07:43 dovecot8 dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Connection closed (auth failed, 1 attempts in 105 secs): user=<user12>, method=PLAIN, rip=xxx.xxx.xxx.12, lip=xxx.xxx.xxx.12, secured, session=<VfN04EkA0LUK> I try telnet ip 144 a login username pass Any idea ?

2 3

Proper way to enable statistics on Dovecot 2.3.20?
by rixati6186＠iturchia.com 12 Jul '23

12 Jul '23

Hi. I'm using Dovecot on OpenBSD OS. "dovecot --version" reports: 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d) and this is my configuration file: https://termbin.com/m4to How to properly set the statistics for the version I use? I have both "service stats" and "service old-stats" and it seems I'm not really getting any statistics. Where's my mistake? Thanks in advance. ("doveadm oldstats top" command gives an empty page with columns.) Thanks.

2 6

argon2id best practices, generating and database storage
by David Mehler 12 Jul '23

12 Jul '23

Hello, To users of argon2id as a password hash, what are best practices/what do you use to generate the argon2id password hashes? I want to know if I should do more than: doveadm pw -s ARGON2ID Also, for storing an argon2id password hash in a database (mysql/mariadb in this example) what value(s) do you use for the field? Thanks. Dave.

1 0

Motion for OCSP Support in Dovecot
by novoMedia 12 Jul '23

12 Jul '23

Currently, Dovecot does not offer any support for OCSP, leaving system administrators with a dilemma: choosing between security or compatibility. - What is OCSP? OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) is a network protocol used to check the validity and revocation status of digital certificates in real-time. - What is Must-Staple? "Must-Staple" is a certificate extension that enforces the inclusion of OCSP stapling information, requiring servers to present the certificate's revocation status during the TLS handshake. - What advantages does the use of Must-Staple offer? The inclusion of a 'must-staple' flag in a certificate mandates the presence of an OCSP response during a TLS handshake, ensuring that a revoked certificate remains (at worst) only usable until the expiration of the latest OCSP response, rather than the expiration of the certificate itself (subject to specific client/implementation). https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/aye79v/the_case_for_ocsp_musts… - What is the current issue with Dovecot? Presently, any system administrator who intends to issue must-staple certificates, faces the dilemma to either chose to a) Refrain from issuing must-staple certificates at all, resulting in the loss of a valuable security feature. b) Issue must-staple certificates without an OCSP response in Dovecot, thereby breaking the TLS RFC (and “hope for the best” on the client side…). A "stuck between a rock and a hard place" situation. - Any other reasons to implement OCSP? Regulatory frameworks such as HIPAA, PCI-DSS and more require the implementation of OCSP to enhance privacy and security. Personally, this requirement does not impact me since I am neither located in the United States nor have customers there. Nonetheless, it is worth noting this requirement for individuals or entities who are subject to these regulations. - Is there demand for OCSP in Dovecot? https://github.com/mjhas/dovecot/issues/44 (First GitHub Google hit for “dovecot ocsp”) https://serverfault.com/questions/830434/do-postfix-and-dovecot-support-ocs… https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-October/113368.html https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-March/103395.html - Summary By implementing a simple OCSP solution, Dovecot could effectively solve this predicament without any drawbacks for its users. The focus here is on simplicity. It is unnecessary to employ a comprehensive OCSP resolver/responder like the one used in Nginx; rather, it would suffice to allow the definition of a simple file path containing the OCSP response alongside the certificate (honoring TLS SNI). Please kindly consider my motion.

4 6

mail-crypt key sharing
by Robert Senger 12 Jul '23

12 Jul '23

Hi all, I am trying to setup mailbox sharing (not public mailboxes) together with mail-crypt plugin and encrypted folder keys. According to the source code of the mail-crypt plugin (there's code trying to retrieve private keys for shared mailboxes), and its documentation, this should be possible: ----- If you are using global keys, mails can be shared within the key scope. The global key can be provided with several different scopes: Global scope: key is configured in dovecot.conf file Per-user(group) scope: key is configured in userdb file With folder keys, key sharing can be done to single user, or multiple users. When key is shared to single user, and the user has public key available, the folder key is encrypted to recipient’s public key. If you have mail_crypt_acl_require_secure_key_sharing enabled, you can’t share the key to groups or someone with no public key. ----- The documentation mentions key sharing, but I have no idea how this could be implemented, and did not find anything else than this mail- crypt documentation in the whole web... I assume that I need to export the user key of the users's folder that should be shared, and import it into the receiving users keys, encrypted with the receiving user's key. Is that right? Any hints how to do that? Regards, Robert -- Robert Senger

1 2

Shared folders?
by joe a 11 Jul '23

11 Jul '23

Is it possible to setup shared folders between virtual users on the same server?

5 9

Public mailboxes and mailcrypt
by Robert Senger 11 Jul '23

11 Jul '23

Hi there, is there a possibility to combine public mailboxes (as described in the first link below) with mailcrypt plugin using per-user keys (as described in the second link below)? I assume, no. But if there's a solution like, for example, storing the decryption key multiple times with different password protection, or by using a global key for the public mailbox only, let me know... I know that I could simply turn off encryption for the public mailbox, and I know how to do that. That's the fllback solution... ;) Regards, Robert (1) https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/shared_mailboxes/public_shared… (2) https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/mail_crypt_plugin/ -- Robert Senger

3 3