- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] How to disable Director service?
by Wesley Huang 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Hi All, Does anyone know how to disable the Director service. In our current running Dovecot 2.2.4, if the director configuration is commented out and Dovecot has no errors nor warnings. But the version 2.2.12 I'm testing with gives out fatal errors. We have dedicated Dovecot Director servers that serve the public frontend and separate dedicated imap/pop3 servers on the backend internal network. With the new version, Dovecot is always trying to start Director service and I couldn't find a way to stop Dovecot from giving out errors. 1. When the entire Director configuration block is commented out, there errors: dovecot: director: Fatal: No inet_listeners defined for director service (for standalone keep director_servers empty) dovecot: master: Error: service(director): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs 2. When the director_servers line is configured as "*director_servers = *", there errors: dovecot: director: Error: Empty server list dovecot: director: Fatal: Invalid value for director_mail_servers setting master: Error: service(director): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs 3. If the director_servers and direcotr_mail_servers are configured the same as our Director servers, there errors: dovecot: director: Fatal: director_servers doesn't list ourself dovecot: master: Error: service(director): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs Does any one know how to disable this director service? We don't need the director service on the backend. Cheers, Wesley

2 2

[Dovecot] Move of mail folders to other mail account on same server
by Jan Valvekens 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

Hi, I'd like to move mail folders from one mail account to another mail account on the same server. Moving the folders via my mail client (Thunderbird) takes a long time. Therefore I wondered whether it's not possible to simply move the files on the server itself. If I unsubscribe to the folders in my source account, then move the folder and subscribe to the folders in my target account: will that work? I run dovecot version 2.1.15 Thanks a lot, Jan

2 1

[Dovecot] Segmentation fault running doveadm index (lucene) on a big mailbox
by Florian Klink 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

Hi, on a server running dovecot 2.2.12 I have a user with a quite big mailbox (~37000 Mails in the INBOX). I tried to enable full text search using the fts_lucene backend (dovecot 2.2.12). However, the `doveadm -v index -u <username> INBOX` always runs into a segmentation fault after mail number 24200: I tried to get a backtrace using gdb: doveadm(<username>): Info: INBOX: Caching mails seq=1..37578 24200/37578 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff6612151 in lucene_index_build_more () from /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib21_fts_lucene_plugin.so (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff6612151 in lucene_index_build_more () from /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib21_fts_lucene_plugin.so #1 0x00007ffff6610b01 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib21_fts_lucene_plugin.so #2 0x00007ffff6820d5b in fts_build_mail () from /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib20_fts_plugin.so #3 0x00007ffff6825b90 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib20_fts_plugin.so #4 0x000000000041650a in ?? () #5 0x00000000004123a7 in _start () `ulimit` reports "unlimited", so ulimits shouldn't be the culprit. Is there another limit in dovecot? Unfortunately, I can't "resume" the process, the indexing always starts again from the beginning. Florian doveconf -n: # 2.2.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.14.0-gentoo x86_64 Gentoo Base System release 2.2 ext4 auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 ntlm mail_gid = 900 mail_location = maildir:/home/vmail/%u mail_plugins = acl quota fts fts_lucene mail_uid = 900 maildir_stat_dirs = yes managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave namespace { hidden = no list = children location = maildir:/home/vmail/%%u/:INDEX=/home/vmail/%%u/ prefix = shared/%%u/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = shared } namespace inbox { inbox = yes list = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / subscriptions = yes type = private } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { acl = vfile acl_shared_dict = file:/home/vmail/shared-mailboxes fts = lucene fts_lucene = whitespace_chars=@. quota = maildir quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M quota_warning = storage=95%% quota-warning 95 %u quota_warning2 = storage=80%% quota-warning 80 %u sieve = /home/vmail/%u/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = /home/vmail/%u/sieve } postmaster_address = postmaster@<domain> protocols = imap pop3 lmtp sieve sieve service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } unix_listener auth-master { group = vmail mode = 0600 user = vmail } } service imap-postlogin { executable = script-login /usr/local/bin/imap-postlogin.sh user = $default_internal_user } service imap { executable = imap imap-postlogin } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } service quota-warning { executable = script /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh unix_listener quota-warning { user = vmail } user = dovecot } ssl = required ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/<domain>/chain.crt ssl_key = </etc/ssl/<domain>/server.key userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } protocol lda { auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mail_plugins = quota sieve acl } protocol imap { mail_plugins = acl quota quota imap_quota imap_acl }

3 6

[Dovecot] migration advice
by Raphael Bauduin 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

Hi, I am preparing a migration from courier-imap to dovecot. The maildir is in each user's home directory, and /home is mounted by NFS. All this running in a kvm virtual machine. My plan would be to create a new virtual machine (with another IP) with dovecot, mounting the same /home, and switching a couple of users to dovecot for testing purpose. If the tests go well, I would then migrate the other users and assign the IP address of the courier imap kvm to the dovecote kvm. Does that make sense? Or can it be problematic to have some users switched to dovecot while their maildir directory is still accessible to courier-imap? Looking forward to reading your feedback, thanks in advance! Raph

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] integration of old mails into new dovecot Maildir
by K. C. Mohan - Personal 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

Thank you for your prompt reply and timely help. I will try to be very explanative in describing my situation. I will begin first with answering the questions you asked; 1) how are the messages storred on the old server, which storage backend do you use, maybe Maildir? Yes, Maildir. Dovecot version is 2.1.7. Virtual users are authenticated by mysql backend. Login is plain login. 2) the storage backend on the new server? Maildir. Dovecot Version 2.2.9. Mysql virtual users authentication. Plain login 3) do you care about the message UIDs? I Would like to preserve the UIDs as much as possible. However, the most important thing is for the users to have access to their old emails. 4) How many users do you have (approx.) and can you access the user's mailboxes via IMAP, e.g. using a master user or do you know their password or can you switch to a known password during migration of one particular user? I have about 50 total users. I can access their mailboxes via imap but I don't have their password handy. Mysql database with the userdata and passwords was imported into the new new server so, the users can get authenticated into the new server with the old server password. 5) Did you've changed namespaces? No. I did not change namespaces. - From your first post I figure that the basic mail server functionality of the new server is working, most importantly login, message delivery and retrieval. Yes, the new server is functional and all the users are able to log in, view delivered messages and retrieve the messages into their mail clients. However, they cannot view any old messages or retrieve any old messages. Here is the dovecot.conf of the old mail server; protocols = imap pop3 log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S " mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n mail_privileged_group = mail first_valid_uid = 6060 ssl_cert= </etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key =< /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem #ssl_ca = </etc/ssl/certs/gd_bundle.crt ssl = yes #ssl_cert = </etc/postfix/ssl/smtpd.crt #ssl_key = </etc/postfix/ssl/smtpd.key protocol imap { mail_plugins = autocreate quota imap_quota } protocol pop3 { pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv mail_plugins = quota } protocol lda { mail_plugins = quota sieve quota_full_tempfail = yes rejection_reason = Your message to <%t> was automatically rejected:%n%r%n%nThe Subject of your message was: %s auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master log_path = /var/log/dovecot-deliver.log postmaster_address = postmaster(a)sbm1.motherindia.com # sieve_path = /var/sieve/global.sieve } auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 auth_debug = no auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_verbose = no auth_verbose_passwords = no disable_plaintext_auth = no instance_name = dovecot login_greeting = Dovecot ready. mail_debug = no passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } -----Original Message----- From: Steffen Kaiser [mailto:skdovecot@smail.inf.fh-brs.de] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 2:18 AM To: K. C. Mohan Cc: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Subject: Re: [Dovecot] integration of old mails into new dovecot Maildir -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, K. C. Mohan wrote: Please, do not top post. > Thank you Steffen, for addressing my problem of migrating old mails > into new mail server. I went through the article you pointed to but > could not succueed. I will appreciate if you could guide me to step by > step process to migrate the mails. My old mail server used 2.x dovecot version. you post very little information: 1) how are the messages storred on the old server, which storage backend do you use, maybe Maildir? 2) the storage backend on the new server? 3) do you care about the message UIDs? 4) How many users do you have (approx.) and can you access the user's mailboxes via IMAP, e.g. using a master user or do you know their password or can you switch to a known password during migration of one particular user? 5) Did you've changed namespaces? - From your first post I figure that the basic mail server functionality of the new server is working, most importantly login, message delivery and retrieval. I have attached both the old and new servers configuration files as .txt attachments. > -----Original Message----- From: Steffen Kaiser > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:14 AM > To: K. C. Mohan - Personal s > Cc: <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org> dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] integration of old mails into new dovecot > Maildir > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, K. C. Mohan - Personal wrote: > >> I just installed dovecot 2.2.9 on to a new server and want to >> transfer all the old mails into the email accounts I imported from >> the previous server into MySQL database. I am not able to view the >> subfolders and or old mails that I copied into their respective >> maildir folders. I was very much appreciate if anyone could let me >> know how to import old mails into the new server. All I see, is the >> new mails that have come into the account since I started dovecot service in the new server. > > Check out <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration . Read esp. about > "preserving messages' UIDs". > > If the old server uses Maildir, too, and you don't care about the > UIDs, copy the files over and you are done. - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBU0t9r3D1/YhP6VMHAQL21wgAx1GgDwQDWwDMPxbMQ+1vR3i7dsyUk5jm PNmRigoV8qylbn2AuZ1YMxGN2wEZfSl2zi/j2CtSEUX+d9LOf+lvI9V8zXkvSHT6 jYEHwuIQACjPUxWmh7x8XelvQvZHB9PEH56z8eJhkgyVxpae8Rbb1EHurvmxckef O0fdmCIglXJdJJ+B9WZ7JZVsB3M6PFFsllizS17+Hus6O2NeVaszLa7o7bk5XInD m+Co4e4sCVphVlssHRCIRa8Lj6nDC+D6g3RjCR+n0rVREXRbvEcSQPerEAqrZhf8 HB46x3V3n6C2fEu7RNWLB0+DzglHLBI5p9ZqAjJRMr3D9Xy9L5SKlQ== =IH25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. <http://www.avast.com> http://www.avast.com --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com

3 2

[Dovecot] About the "nologin" extra field
by Axel Luttgens 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Hello, While experimenting with the "nologin" extra field, I met a possibly overlooked behavior. Let's suppose the user database has those two columns: enabled: the user may/may not login (account active/not active) nologin: NULL if the mailbox is available, '!' if it is currently suspended (for maintenance reasons) The password_query: password_query = SELECT password, nologin, 'Maintenance' || nologin AS reason, [...] FROM [...] WHERE [...] AND enabled [...] Let's then experiment with pop connections. With: enabled set to false, nologin set to '!' the right password provided, following reply is emitted after an authentication failure delay: -ERR [AUTH] Authentication failed. So, as expected, the nologin value behaves as a "don't care" one. With: enabled set to true, nologin set to '!', the right password provided, following output is immediately emitted: -ERR [AUTH] Maintenance! Again, this is the kind of behavior I was expecting. With: enabled set to true, nologin set to '!', an incorrect password provided, there's the failure delay but the output still is: -ERR [AUTH] Maintenance! Here, I'm a bit dubitative... ;-) The delay seems to make the code's intent clear: to act as in the case of an authentication failure. But, notwithstanding the somewhat misleading explanation provided to a legitimate user with such a reply, isn't one unduly disclosing information about an account existence? Is this supposed to behave that way? If yes, what's the rationale? TIA, Axel

1 0

[Dovecot] POP3: Panic: Trying to allocate 0 bytes
by Urban Loesch 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Hi, today I upgraded one of our dovecot servers from 2.117 to version 2.2.12 under Debian Squeeze. After the upgrade I got many of the following errors for pop3 users. My logfile shows: ... Apr 14 09:28:05 mailstore dovecot: pop3(user(a)domain.net pid:39688 session:<o1DTn/v2IABPNmv7>): Panic: Trying to allocate 0 bytes Apr 14 09:28:05 mailstore dovecot: pop3(user(a)domain.net pid:39688 session:<o1DTn/v2IABPNmv7>): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x6bb0a) [0x7f1ae9a18b0a] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot. so.0(+0x6bb86) [0x7f1ae9a18b86] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_error+0) [0x7f1ae99d1e8f] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x8148b) [0x7f1ae9a2e48b] -> dovecot/pop3() [0x4077f0] -> dovecot/pop3(client_command_execute+0x9d) [0x4 07d0d] -> dovecot/pop3(client_handle_input+0x80) [0x405810] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x4e) [0x7f1ae9a28d2e] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run_internal+0xaf) [0x7f1ae9a29e9f] -> /usr/lib/do vecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x9) [0x7f1ae9a28db9] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x38) [0x7f1ae9a28e38] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f1ae99d6c43] -> dovecot/pop3(main+0x2 57) [0x404a67] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7f1ae9669c8d] -> dovecot/pop3() [0x4045b9] Apr 14 09:28:05 mailstore dovecot: pop3(user(a)domain.net pid:39688 session:<o1DTn/v2IABPNmv7>): Fatal: master: service(pop3): child 39688 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled) .... Have you any idea what the error could be? As this is a production server I switched back to version 2.1.17. Many thanks Urban Loesch doveconf -n: # 2.2.12 (978871ca81e7): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.4.67-vs2.3.3.9-rol-em64t-efigpt x86_64 Debian 6.0.9 ext4 auth_cache_negative_ttl = 0 auth_cache_size = 40 M auth_cache_ttl = 1 weeks auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_verbose = yes deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: %$ %p %w disable_plaintext_auth = no login_trusted_networks = $INTERNAL_IPS mail_gid = mailstore mail_location = mdbox:/home/vmail/%d/%n:INDEX=/home/dovecotindex/%d/%n mail_log_prefix = "%s(%u pid:%p session:<%{session}>): " mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify zlib" mail_uid = mailstore managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave imapflags notify mdbox_rotate_size = 10 M namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Items" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / type = private } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-account.conf driver = sql } plugin { mail_log_events = delete undelete expunge copy mailbox_delete mailbox_rename mail_log_fields = uid box msgid size from mail_log_group_events = no quota = dict:Storage used::file:%h/dovecot-quota quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M quota_warning = storage=95%% quota-warning 95 %u quota_warning2 = storage=80%% quota-warning 80 %u sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve sieve_extensions = +notify +imapflags sieve_max_redirects = 10 zlib_save = gz zlib_save_level = 9 } protocols = imap pop3 lmtp sieve service auth { unix_listener auth-userdb { group = mailstore mode = 0660 user = root } } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 143 } process_limit = 256 process_min_avail = 25 service_count = 1 } service imap { process_limit = 256 process_min_avail = 25 service_count = 1 } service lmtp { inet_listener lmtp { address = * port = 24 } unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } } service pop3-login { inet_listener pop3 { port = 110 } process_limit = 256 process_min_avail = 25 service_count = 1 } service pop3 { process_limit = 256 process_min_avail = 25 service_count = 1 } service quota-warning { executable = script /usr/local/rol/dovecot/quota-warning.sh unix_listener quota-warning { user = mailstore } user = mailstore } ssl = no ssl_cert = </etc/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-account.conf driver = sql } protocol lmtp { mail_fsync = optimized mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify zlib sieve zlib" } protocol imap { imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_id_log = * imap_logout_format = bytes=%i/%o session=<%{session}> mail_max_userip_connections = 40 mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify zlib imap_quota imap_zlib" } protocol pop3 { mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify zlib" pop3_logout_format = bytes_sent=%o top=%t/%p, retr=%r/%b, del=%d/%m, size=%s uidl_hash=%u session=<%{session}> pop3_reuse_xuidl = yes }

1 0

[Dovecot] Feature Request: handle mail connections of the same user from a same IP using just one mail process
by morrison 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Hi, Dovecot Wiki states that mail process (IMAP/POP3) is able to handle multiple client connections as the same time to save CPU and memory resources (client_limit > 1). Although this approach is not recommended due to latency and probably security issues, it does help increase the overall capacity of a mail server. Is it possible (or planned) to add a feature such that mail client connections of the same user from a same IP are directed to a same mail process? In most cases, such connections come from a same mail client (e.g. in Thunderbird, each mailbox is a connection). The end user (human being) can work on one mailbox at a time, the latency will be non-obvious. And since all data being processed belong to the same user, security is a non-issue. Thanks,

3 2

Re: [Dovecot] integration of old mails into new dovecot Maildir
by K. C. Mohan 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Thank you Steffen, for addressing my problem of migrating old mails into new mail server. I went through the article you pointed to but could not succueed. I will appreciate if you could guide me to step by step process to migrate the mails. My old mail server used 2.x dovecot version. K. C. Mohan -----Original Message----- From: Steffen Kaiser Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:14 AM To: K. C. Mohan - Personal s Cc: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Subject: Re: [Dovecot] integration of old mails into new dovecot Maildir -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, K. C. Mohan - Personal wrote: > I just installed dovecot 2.2.9 on to a new server and want to transfer all > the old mails into the email accounts I imported from the previous server > into MySQL database. I am not able to view the subfolders and or old mails > that I copied into their respective maildir folders. I was very much > appreciate if anyone could let me know how to import old mails into the > new > server. All I see, is the new mails that have come into the account since > I > started dovecot service in the new server. Check out http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration . Read esp. about "preserving messages' UIDs". If the old server uses Maildir, too, and you don't care about the UIDs, copy the files over and you are done. - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBU0Zu/3D1/YhP6VMHAQKO0QgA7v5CowgoagbvEC3S0XI3k3QUHlsUczLE 38MedNzPw8cc69OHwzWxfxDiuCU2g2Q+Bv1vKMp+7aY2e9nCwUKcT0tOZGf7Nxrw IDG5dJbRtQSwTSOOvHSj1/SLY/tbYB71NkAPZl3XunFKcbkGl2BYKDfj+BuZ+WMZ pDj6B9S8GuV7BJNWlP4fRaHyrGDwfYuUmj1bTEoNuAFFPW11HfAwxRUQgnOKU9GJ zxERX2Tg7+Xj/RM49InQd8qqczYjsNte6M58a+6dwStGkPK4y0XD8nwsH8r4skvN utKKG+dRln+94oVnSG8WNNKpVmZt8K9oNHWq1CxVRIoqu2tUmppr0g== =qQnO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Dovecot] FTS autoindex username problem
by 李耀宗 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

I tried to set up Solr search server according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr, and turned on autoindexing according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS, but I found a strange behaviour that cause server search missing some emails. Here is the login information of my mail server: login name: user1 email: user1(a)example.com Now, when I turned on autoindexing, all autoindexed email are indexed using user1(a)example.com as username key, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1(a)example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX But when I triggered on-demand indexing using IMAP server search, the emails are indexed using user1 as username key instead, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1): Indexed 1799 messages in INBOX Only the emails indexed using user1 can be searched, emails indexed using user1(a)example.com cannot be found. How can I configure autoindex to index email using user1 as username key? --- (Below is a follow-up question) In my mail server config, there are a few virtual mailbox users are using the following login information instead (different auth/password backend): login name: user2(a)virtmail.example.com email: user2(a)virtmail.example.com In this case, how can I distinguish user1(a)example.com and user2(a)virtmail.example.com, so that emails for user1(a)example.com can be indexed using user1 as username key, while user2(a)virtmail.example.com can be indexed using user2(a)virtmail.example.com as username key? .

2 2

[Dovecot] Still no messages from dovecot
by Steve Campbell 12 Apr '14

12 Apr '14

I'm still not seeing emails from the list. With help from others, I thought I had the IPs cleared since the change back in February, but apparently not. Can someone PM me and let me know what outgoing IP addresses the list is using please? steve campbell

2 1

[Dovecot] Will upgrade from from db4 to libdb break anything?
by A M 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

Hello, I just have a minor question. (Using Fedora 16) My current dovecot (2.2.10) was compiled with db4 (4.8.30). I am thinking of recompiling same dovecot (2.2.10) with libdb (5.2.36). I will be trying on live server so just wanted to know if this will this break any indexing or anything else? (Recompiling for Heartbleed, so might as well switch db version) AM.

1 0

[Dovecot] FTS autoindex username problem
by lee_yiu_chung＠yahoo.com 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

I tried to set up Solr search server according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr, and turned on autoindexing according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS, but I found a strange behaviour that cause server search missing some emails. Here is the login information of my mail server: version: 2.2.12 login name: user1 email: user1(a)example.com Now, when I turned on autoindexing, all autoindexed email are indexed using user1(a)example.com as username key, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1(a)example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX But when I triggered on-demand indexing using IMAP server search, the emails are indexed using user1 as username key instead, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1): Indexed 1799 messages in INBOX Only the emails indexed using user1 can be searched, emails indexed using user1(a)example.com cannot be found. How can I configure autoindex to index email using user1 as username key? --- (Below is a follow-up question) In my mail server config, there are a few virtual mailbox users are using the following login information instead (different auth/password backend): login name: user2(a)virtmail.example.com email: user2(a)virtmail.example.com In this case, how can I distinguish user1(a)example.com and user2(a)virtmail.example.com, so that emails for user1(a)example.com can be indexed using user1 as username key, while user2(a)virtmail.example.com can be indexed using user2(a)virtmail.example.com as username key?

1 0

[Dovecot] FTS autoindex username problem
by lee_yiu_chung＠yahoo.com 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

I tried to set up Solr search server according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr, and turned on autoindexing according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS, but I found a strange behaviour that cause server search missing some emails. Here is the login information of my mail server: login name: user1 email: user1(a)example.com Now, when I turned on autoindexing, all autoindexed email are indexed using user1(a)example.com as username key, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1(a)example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX But when I triggered on-demand indexing using IMAP server search, the emails are indexed using user1 as username key instead, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1): Indexed 1799 messages in INBOX Only the emails indexed using user1 can be searched, emails indexed using user1(a)example.com cannot be found. How can I configure autoindex to index email using user1 as username key? --- (Below is a follow-up question) In my mail server config, there are a few virtual mailbox users are using the following login information instead (different auth/password backend): login name: user2(a)virtmail.example.com email: user2(a)virtmail.example.com In this case, how can I distinguish user1(a)example.com and user2(a)virtmail.example.com, so that emails for user1(a)example.com can be indexed using user1 as username key, while user2(a)virtmail.example.com can be indexed using user2(a)virtmail.example.com as username key?

1 0

[Dovecot] FTS autoindex username problem
by lee_yiu_chung＠yahoo.com 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

I tried to set up Solr search server according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr, and turned on autoindexing according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS, but I found a strange behaviour that cause server search missing some emails. Here is the login information of my mail server: login name: user1 email: user1(a)example.com Now, when I turned on autoindexing, all autoindexed email are indexed using user1(a)example.com as username key, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1(a)example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX But when I triggered on-demand indexing using IMAP server search, the emails are indexed using user1 as username key instead, as shown in maillog: dovecot: [ID 12345 mail.info] indexer-worker(user1): Indexed 1799 messages in INBOX Only the emails indexed using user1 can be searched, emails indexed using user1(a)example.com cannot be found. How can I configure autoindex to index email using user1 as username key? --- (Below is a follow-up question) In my mail server config, there are a few virtual mailbox users are using the following login information instead (different auth/password backend): login name: user2(a)virtmail.example.com email: user2(a)virtmail.example.com In this case, how can I distinguish user1(a)example.com and user2(a)virtmail.example.com, so that emails for user1(a)example.com can be indexed using user1 as username key, while user2(a)virtmail.example.com can be indexed using user2(a)virtmail.example.com as username key?

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] replication + attachment sis + zlib bug ? (HEAD version from xi.rename-it.nl)
by Pavel Stano 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

Yes, exactly. I look at the code and find out there is functionality for that. Dovecot store attachments in base64 format without decoding if there are longer lines with more base64 blocks (4chars). So these attachments get deduplicated but are not decoded. But it don't work if last line is buggy. I think i fixed it. It looks like it works, but i test only one mailbox. Patch attached On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:29:53 +0200 Gilles Chauvin <gilles.chauvin(a)univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > On 10/04/2014 18:21, Pavel Stano wrote: > > Hi, > > > > yes its the same problem. > > I can confirm that it is caused by last line in base64 > > attachment which is longer than 72 chars in original message. > > > > > > Hi, > > I don't know what is the current status for this issue since Timo > never responded to my two mails. A safe way to workaround this > problem could be Dovecot skipping deduplication when it encounters a > malformed base64 attachment ? > > > > Regards, > Gilles. -- [ Ohodnotte kvalitu mailu: http://nicereply.com/websupport/Stano/ ] Pavel Stano | Troubleshooter http://WebSupport.sk *** BERTE A VYCHUTNAVAJTE ***

1 0

[Dovecot] FTS autoindex problem
by lee_yiu_chung＠yahoo.com 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

I tried to implement a solr search server, but I found some unexpected behaviour when I turn on autoindex according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS. I found that all autoindexed email are using "user1(a)example.com" as username, as shown in maillog: indexer-worker(user1(a)example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX However, all manually indexed email (triggered by IMAP server search) are using "user1" as username, as shown in maillog: indexer-worker(user1): Indexed 2927 messages in INBOX. I am using "user1" as login name, so all autoindexed mails don't appear in search result. How can I use "user" as the username in autoindex? BTW, I do have a few mailboxes in the format user2(a)virtualmail.example.com, which requires full email address as the login name. How can I autoindex emails that automatically distinguishes user1(a)example.com (using "user1" as username) and user2(a)virtualmail.example.com (using "user2(a)virtualmail.example.com" as username) given that the previous question is solved?

1 0

[Dovecot] FTS autoindex problem
by lee_yiu_chung＠yahoo.com 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

I tried to implement a solr search server, but I found some unexpected behaviour when I turn on autoindex according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS. I found that all autoindexed email are using "user1(a)example.com" as username, as shown in maillog: indexer-worker(user1(a)example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX However, all manually indexed email (triggered by IMAP server search) are using "user1" as username, as shown in maillog: indexer-worker(user1): Indexed 2927 messages in INBOX. I am using "user1" as login name, so all autoindexed mails don't appear in search result. How can I use "user" as the username in autoindex? BTW, I do have a few mailboxes in the format user2(a)virtualmail.example.com, which requires full email address as the login name. How can I autoindex emails that automatically distinguishes user1(a)example.com (using "user1" as username) and user2(a)virtualmail.example.com (using "user2(a)virtualmail.example.com" as username) given that the previous question is solved?

1 0

[Dovecot] Dovecot XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE Apple
by Volker Schwaberow 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Hello list. Anybody having experience with the Apple Extensions for Dovecot at http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/dovecot/dovecot-239.8/dovecot/src/im… ? Is it possible to patch the Dovecot source with them and get them to work on a Non-Apple System? Cheers, Volker —— Volker Schwaberow Email: volker(a)schwaberow.de

3 2

[Dovecot] replication + attachment sis + zlib bug ? (HEAD version from xi.rename-it.nl)
by Pavel Stano 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Hi, i have setup with mail_attachment single instance store + replication + zlib and got this bug when i try to replicate one test mailbox: On master1 in mail.log: Apr 10 13:25:22 master1 dovecot: dsync-local(zzz(a)blabla666.sk): Error: read(/nfsmnt/mailnfs1/attachments1/6b/57/6b57ad34cf6c414662233d833a7801fde4e1cdcb-92b5052558774653a728000013e2b982[base64:18 b/l]) failed: Stream is larger than expected (97824 > 97823, eof=1) Apr 10 13:25:22 master1 dovecot: dsync-local(zzz(a)blabla666.sk): Error: dsync(master2): read(attachments-connector(zlib(/nfsmnt/mailnfs1/b/l/blabla666.sk/zzz(a)blabla666.sk/mdbox/storage/m.9))) failed: read(/nfsmnt/mailnfs1/attachments1/6b/57/6b57ad34cf6c414662233d833a7801fde4e1cdcb-92b5052558774653a728000013e2b982[base64:18 b/l]) failed: Stream is larger than expected (97824 > 97823, eof=1) This is on master2 in mail.log Apr 10 13:32:21 master2 dovecot: dsync-server(zzz(a)blabla666.sk): Error: dsync(master1): read() failed: read(10.10.30.2) failed: dot-input stream ends without '.' line I tried to rm -Rf mailbox on master2 and run on master1 doveadm replicator remove zzz(a)blabla666.sk doveadm replicator replicate zzz(a)blabla666.sk but same problem happen. Thanks -- [ Ohodnotte kvalitu mailu: http://nicereply.com/websupport/Stano/ ] Pavel Stano | Troubleshooter http://WebSupport.sk *** BERTE A VYCHUTNAVAJTE ***

2 2

[Dovecot] dsync deleted my mailbox - what did I do wrong?
by Benjamin Podszun 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Hi. Mostly annoying: I migrated from one machine to another, made sure the target host worked as expected, updated mx records and - after a couple of days - signed it off as good. This is just my private machine, no big deal if something goes wrong.. Everything's fine? Good, let's migrate my inbox from the old machine. There's no direct connectivity between those servers, so what I did was: (old server) sudo -u vmail dsync -u dar(a)darklajid.de backup maildir:/tmp/mail_backup/ Works fine, got my maildir. Tar'd it up, moved it to the new server. Now how do I import those mails? Ah, let's use the same command, with -R? (new server) sudo -u vmail dsync -u dar(a)darklajid.de -R backup maildir:/tmp/mail_backup Error: Mailbox INBOX sync: mailbox_delete failed: INBOX can't be deleted. Wait. What? Sure enough, the last couple of days are gone, the target mailbox is completely empty. I read the man page over and over again, but failed to see the problem. I even thought for a moment that _maybe_ dsync backup is one-way only (even if that failed as well) and tried the same command with mirror. Exactly the same output, same result, empty target mailbox. In the end I succeeded to import the mails with doveadm import, completely lost a number of days of mails. My fault, sloppy not to back the up again, but I still don't think that this should happen. Ever. My question now is: - where did I fail (ignoring the backups, please. That's .. something I know) - Can I use dsync ... for backups? I don't think that this is a good idea after yesterday night? - Should dsync EVER try to delete mailboxes? Even 'special' mailboxes? Should it warn about that, asking for a --force switch or something? Any insights would be appreciated. At this point the damage is done, but I'd like to learn how to do better. Ben

4 9

[Dovecot] integration of old mails into new dovecot Maildir
by K. C. Mohan - Personal 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

I just installed dovecot 2.2.9 on to a new server and want to transfer all the old mails into the email accounts I imported from the previous server into MySQL database. I am not able to view the subfolders and or old mails that I copied into their respective maildir folders. I was very much appreciate if anyone could let me know how to import old mails into the new server. All I see, is the new mails that have come into the account since I started dovecot service in the new server. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com

2 1

[Dovecot] IMAP, POP, LMTP response time
by adarshvs 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Hi, How do I retrieve the /response time/ metrics for imap, pop, lmtp and smtp. Any suggestions will be very helpful. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://dovecot.2317879.n4.nabble.com/IMAP-POP-LMTP-response-time-tp47500.ht… Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

[Dovecot] Heartbleed openssl vulnerability?
by John Rowe 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem? I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being intrinsically vulnerable. An on-line tool says that my machine is not affected on port 993 but it would be nice to know for sure if we were vulnerable for a while. (Naturally I've blocked it anyway!). Thanks John

9 20

[Dovecot] Director NFS backups
by Murray Trainer 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Hi All, What is the recommended method of taking backups of user mailboxes when using the Director setup with NFS backend mail storage? Is there any way to avoid the likely NFS locking issues by backing up the filesystem directly or do I have to do some sort of dsync method. If I have to use dsync can I dsync the mailboxes to compressed copies of the mailboxes without requiring another dovecot server to do the dsync. Thanks for you responses. Murray

1 0