- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Security precautions for remote clients
by Roman Gelfand 06 Nov '12

06 Nov '12

Where can I find something like remote client secure dovecot best practices or, perhaps, if there is not many, if you could list major configuration/setup points. Thanks in advance

2 1

[Dovecot] Quota
by Christian Rößner 05 Nov '12

05 Nov '12

Hi, is it possible to ask Dovecot for a users quota by talking to the Dovecot server over TCP? I know about doveadm quota -u <user>, but I would like to know, if I can query for that over a network connection (on the Postfix ML they suggested writing a policy service that checks quota. Postfix is not always on the same server as Dovecot is). Does the LMTP protocol give that information somehow? I am not so familiar with LMTP. Or some Unix-Socket to query that could also be configured as inet_listener? Thanks in advance -Christian Rößner -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Joerg Heidrich

3 5

[Dovecot] maildir S= and W=
by Christoph Anton Mitterer 05 Nov '12

05 Nov '12

Hi. Even new mails delivered by my MDA don't get the ,S= and ,W= fields set... (but when I "upload" a mail via IMAP to dovecot, they are set) Is there some place in dovecot where I need to enable this? Or would it be the MDA that has to calculate and set this already when placing a file in ./new? Thanks, Chris.

2 6

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP benefit vs LDA
by Joseph Tam 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Daniel Parthey writes: > Davide wrote: >> my question is what is benefit implementing LMTP service replacing >> LDA i have dovecot 2.1.8 with vpoipmail+qmail and about 500 users >> now i'm using LDA and i'm interested on LMTP service. > > with LMTP... > * you dont need to care about mail filesystem permissions > * you can use dovecot lmtp proxy and/or director > * you don't need to spawn a new process for each message One of the (potential) benefit is that a LMTP, because it can handle multiple recipients, has the ability to optimize I/O (or storage?) by using hardlinking to a single copy of a message (deduping). I don't know if Dovecot takes advantage of this in any way though. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[Dovecot] dovecot default service
by mican zhang 03 Nov '12

03 Nov '12

i install dovecot 2 and when i try ps auxw|grep "dovecot" i just get only 5processes, root 21861 0.0 0.0 14884 980 ? Ss 16:53 0:00 /usr/local/sbin /dovecot dovecot 21862 0.0 0.0 12740 968 ? S 16:53 0:00 dovecot/anvil root 21863 0.0 0.0 12872 1088 ? S 16:53 0:00 dovecot/log root 21865 0.0 0.0 15356 1468 ? S 16:53 0:00 dovecot/config root 21945 0.0 0.0 61148 800 pts/0 S+ 17:04 0:00 grep dovecot , my os is redhat 5.4 and i just install like ./configure make &make install i don't what's wrong?i also test on centos 6.2,and result is the same does anyone has the same issue?and what should i do to fix this?

2 3

[Dovecot] sessionid in logout line
by Aleksandar Lazic 03 Nov '12

03 Nov '12

Dear listmembers. I have the following login_log_format_elements = service=%s user=<%u> session=%{session} method=%m rip=%r lip=%l mpid=%e %c %k Maybe I have overseen the config option to add the %{session} also to the logout line. Here a example from my log: ### Nov 3 00:46:43 <HOST> dovecot: imap-login: Login: service=imap, user=<USER>, session=ETV8v4vNfwB/AAAB, method=CRAM-MD5, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=14874, TLS, TLSv1.1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) zlib compression Nov 3 00:46:43 external dovecot: imap(USER): Disconnected: Logged out in=15649 out=80199 ### Thanks for help and answers. Best regards Aleks

2 2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot dimensioning
by mancyborg＠gmail.com 02 Nov '12

02 Nov '12

Hi Javier, yes i see. Storage for now is just a 3tb sata2 hdd, so i guess that write performance is around 100 MB/s What do you think about that ? Thanks and regards, Mike On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:55:35 +0100 Javier de Miguel Rodriguez <javierdemiguel-ext(a)us.es> wrote: > > IMHO, fast storage is the main requirement for dovecot. > > > > El 01/11/2012, a las 16:20, "mancyborg(a)gmail.com" <mancyborg(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > Hi All, first post here, nice to meet you :) > > > > I've been using dovecot + postfix + clamav + spamassassin for years but always with few users. > > > > Now i must build a server for 1500 users, > > they will use various email software (thunderbird, outlook, ..) > > the webmail (i'm not sure if squirrelmail or roundcube) > > and blackberry devices (with the BIS service). > > > > There will be around 1000 domains (virtual_domains) and postfix will read its users and domains from mysql. > > > > Let's say that they will send and receive around 5000 emails per hour (10K in total per hour). > > > > I was thinking to use karspersky server instead of clamav. > > > > I already have the hardware, it is a server with 4 physical cpu (Intel Xeon E5504 @ 2.00GHz) and 24 gb of ram, > > do you think it is enough ? > > > > > > Thanks for supporting, > > regards and have a nice day, > > Mike

3 3

[Dovecot] dovecot dimensioning
by mancyborg＠gmail.com 01 Nov '12

01 Nov '12

Hi All, first post here, nice to meet you :) I've been using dovecot + postfix + clamav + spamassassin for years but always with few users. Now i must build a server for 1500 users, they will use various email software (thunderbird, outlook, ..) the webmail (i'm not sure if squirrelmail or roundcube) and blackberry devices (with the BIS service). There will be around 1000 domains (virtual_domains) and postfix will read its users and domains from mysql. Let's say that they will send and receive around 5000 emails per hour (10K in total per hour). I was thinking to use karspersky server instead of clamav. I already have the hardware, it is a server with 4 physical cpu (Intel Xeon E5504 @ 2.00GHz) and 24 gb of ram, do you think it is enough ? Thanks for supporting, regards and have a nice day, Mike

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10
by Daniel L. Miller 01 Nov '12

01 Nov '12

On 31.10.2012 21:23, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > On 31.10.2012 21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > >> On 31.10.2012 > > 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >>> I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed > could also do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the > > installed > dovecot-config and > >> -left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">I see > pto" already in the DOVECOT_SSL_LIBS section of > > /usr/local/lib/dovecot/dovecot-config. What should be changed? > > Ok - I > read the patch, and modified the LIBDOVECOT_STORAGE section accordingly. > Same comp> > >> Thought I'd see if I could guess the next fix - added the parms to LIBDOVECOT_LOGIN as well. Seems to have fixed it. Sorry for the multiple posts - it's been a long day. -- Daniel

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10
by Daniel L. Miller 01 Nov '12

01 Nov '12

On 31.10.2012 21:23, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > On 31.10.2012 21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > >> On 31.10.2012 > > 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >>> I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed > could also do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the > > installed > dovecot-config and > >> -left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">I see > pto" already in the DOVECOT_SSL_LIBS section of > > /usr/local/lib/dovecot/dovecot-config. What should be changed? > > Ok - I > read the patch, and modified the LIBDOVECOT_STORAGE section accordingly. > Same comp> > >> I take that back - it's not exactly the same compile error. Now it references libdovecot-login.so for the undefined SSL references. -- Daniel

1 0