- dovecot - dovecot.org

Re: [Dovecot] started with dovecot sieve
by Daniel Parthey 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Rolf wrote: > Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 dovecot: lda(rolf): Error: setegid(privileged) failed: Operation not permitted Manual page "man 2 setegid" states that setegid() sets the effective group ID of the calling process. Unprivi- leged user processes may only set the effective group ID to the real group ID, the effective group ID or the saved set-group-ID. Your "postfix" user is a member of group "mail", but "mail" which you configured as "mail_privileged_group = vmail" is neither the primary group of user "postfix", nor is it the effective group id of the calling postfix process. Therefore you might get the error as documented in the manpage setegid(2): EPERM The calling process is not privileged (Linux: does not have the CAP_SETUID capability in the case of seteuid(), or the CAP_SET- GID capability in the case of setegid()) and euid (respectively, egid) is not the real user (group) ID, the effective user (group) ID, or the saved set-user-ID (saved set-group-ID). Regards Daniel -- https://plus.google.com/103021802792276734820

2 1

[Dovecot] Dovecot performance under high load (vs. Courier)
by email builder 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Hi, We are building a new system that will support a large number of users (high volume, high concurrent usage, etc). We have played with Dovecot, but in most serious applications we have traditionally used Courier IMAP. It's my (lay) understanding that with indexing and perhaps other things in Dovecot, it might perform better than Courier in larger environments like this. Am I correct or is it less clear-cut? Any tips on making the migration (not migrating an existing system, I mean migrating our paradigm - things to consider, things to watch out for)? TIA

10 36

[Dovecot] Virtual users - what is better Maildir or mbox?
by Kaya Saman 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

Hi, I'm trying to configure a server to use SAMBA and Winbind to authenticate to Active Directory.... I managed to get this portion up and running even the Dovecot portion. For reference something similar to this guide: http://www.whitneytechnologies.com/?p=119 However PAM is slightly different: # cat /etc/pam.d/dovecot auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_user_check validate account sufficient pam_permit.so This is what my dovecot.conf file looks like: # cat dovecot.conf # v1.2+: auth_use_winbind = yes auth_winbind_helper_path = /usr/local/bin/ntlm_auth protocols = imap # It's nice to have separate log files for Dovecot. You could do this # by changing syslog configuration also, but this is easier. log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot-info.log # Disable SSL for now. ssl = no disable_plaintext_auth = no # We're using Maildir format #mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir mail_location = mbox:/mail:INBOX=/mail/%u # Authentication configuration: auth_verbose = yes auth_debug = yes auth_username_format = %n auth_mechanisms = plain ntlm login userdb { driver = static # args = uid=501 gid=1001 home=/mail/%u args = home=/mail/%u driver = static } passdb { driver = pam args = failure_show_msg=yes } Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual hosting" Maildir or mbox? Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users via either individual folders and then put each user's mbox or Maildir in the created directory, or simply name each mbox or Maildir according to the user name. First up is this possible? Secondly, how would I go about doing it? My users are not allowed to login to the system outside of IMAP as it's a Mail only server. Currently I've been looking at many links: http://satish-linuxbug.blogspot.co.uk/2008/08/freebsd-with-active-directory… http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/2005/11/08/freebsd-users-and-groups-with-s… http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms/Winbind http://wiki2.dovecot.org/TestInstallation http://wiki2.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers http://www.linuxmail.info/active-directory-dovecot-pam-authentication/ http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/SimpleVirtualInstall I'm running dovecot version 2.1.7 on FreeBSD 8.2 x64 RELEASE. The system is not being used as an MTA server meaning that only IMAP transfers are being done using MS Outlook then filtered by Thunderbird. Regards, Kaya

6 15

[Dovecot] started with dovecot sieve
by mailinglist 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

As I am new to dovecot and sieve I am really happy to get it working in a straight forward way. Thanks for the documentation to whom it concerns. Now I came to my limits with this failure messages in /home/rolf/.dovecot.sieve.log: sieve: info: started log at Jun 25 20:22:54. error: msgid=<1340648569.94073.YahooMailClassic(a)web190304.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX': BUG: Unknown internal error. with this messages in mail.info: Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 postfix/smtpd[21674]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 postfix/smtpd[21674]: 90898E0190: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 postfix/cleanup[21669]: 90898E0190: message-id=<1340648569.94073.YahooMailClassic(a)web190304.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 postfix/qmgr[21172]: 90898E0190: from=<stephanie.otavy(a)live.com>, size=5291, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 postfix/smtpd[21674]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 dovecot: lda(rolf): Error: setegid(privileged) failed: Operation not permitted Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 dovecot: lda(rolf): Error: sieve: msgid=<1340648569.94073.YahooMailClassic(a)web190304.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX': BUG: Unknown internal error Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 dovecot: lda(rolf): Error: sieve: script /home/rolf/.dovecot.sieve failed with unsuccessful implicit keep (user logfile /home/rolf/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) I guess the mentioned mail is spam. However, does this tell about some wrong configuration or access rights? Any indication what to improve? I get such an error about every 6 minutes.

2 2

[Dovecot] Director + managesieve: is it posible?
by Joseba Torre 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

Hi, I've just tried to add managesieve to our director server, and when I try to connect they fail with Jun 26 12:28:13 director2 dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: AUTH#0111#011PLAIN#011service=sieve#011secured#011session=5LNQjl3DjQAKAAsR#011lip=10.0.100.75#011rip=10.0.11.17#011lport=4190#011rport=39309#011resp=<hidden> Jun 26 12:28:13 director2 dovecot: managesieve-login: Error: proxy: host not given: user=<test1>, method=PLAIN, rip=10.0.11.17, lip=10.0.100.75, TLS, session=<5LNQjl3DjQAKAAsR> Jun 26 12:28:13 director2 dovecot: managesieve-login: Disconnected (internal failure, 1 succesful auths): user=<lgsfeacd>, method=PLAIN, rip=10.0.11.17, lip=10.0.100.75, TLS, session=<5LNQjl3DjQAKAAsR> Is it posible to use director for this? Or only static proxy is allowed? Aaaaaaaaagur.

2 1

[Dovecot] dsync error: "Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs"
by Jeff Gustafson 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

I'm getting an error backing up mailboxes. I'm using the mirror command: dsync -fvo mail_home=/home/users/bob mirror ssh vmail(a)10.1.4.1 dsync -o mail_home=/home/.incoming_mail_migrations/users/bob dsync-remote(vmail): Error: Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs: 1ef6ee37c694894d783100000581a675 is shared by INBOX and INBOX dsync-remote(vmail): Error: command BOX-LIST failed dsync-local(vmail): Error: Worker server's mailbox iteration failed The mail user doesn't yet exist on the destination yet, thus the use of the mail_home parameter. I found a mailing list message where a person was having a similar problem but I couldn't find confirmation that the issue was resolved. In our case, the backup goes from maildir to mdbox format (we can't to convert to mdbox). Things seemed to be moving along, but there are quite a few examples of dsync failing. I think the issue happens more often with large mailboxes ( > 50GB ). We're running version 2.0.13. doveconf -n: # 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-274.12.1.el5 x86_64 CentOS release 5.7 (Final) auth_mechanisms = plain login default_client_limit = 15000 default_process_limit = 10000 disable_plaintext_auth = no listen = * mail_gid = vmail mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir mail_plugins = zlib mail_uid = vmail mmap_disable = yes namespace { inbox = yes location = prefix = INBOX. separator = . } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/conf.d/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { zlib_save = gz } protocols = imap pop3 service auth { client_limit = 10000 unix_listener auth-userdb { mode = 0666 } } service imap-postlogin { executable = script-login /usr/bin/postlogin-imap.sh user = $default_internal_user } service imap { drop_priv_before_exec = yes executable = imap process_limit = 10000 } service pop3-postlogin { executable = script-login /usr/bin/postlogin-pop.sh user = $default_internal_user } } service pop3 { drop_priv_before_exec = yes executable = pop3 process_limit = 2500 } ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = prefetch } userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/conf.d/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins = zlib } protocol lda { mail_plugins = zlib } protocol imap { mail_max_userip_connections = 100 mail_plugins = zlib } protocol pop3 { mail_max_userip_connections = 30 mail_plugins = zlib } ...Jeff

4 6

[Dovecot] specifying home/sieve/sieve_dir relative to mail_location
by Edgar Fuß 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

With 1.2, is it possible to specify home, sieve and sieve_dir relative to mail_location? I have mail_location = maildir:/import/mail/%n/:INDEX=/var/db/dovecot/indexes/%n and, in the plugin section, home = /import/mail/%n/home sieve = /import/mail/%n/dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = /import/mail/%n/sieve I would like to partially move users to another location (different file server) by using an LDAP entry. I know it's possible to specify everything relative to home, so I could probably use relative ~/../-type paths for mail_locatin etc., but that looks a bit awkward. The VirtualUsers/Home Wiki enty contains an example for relative paths user_attrs = .., mailDirectory=home=/var/vmail/%$ which I do not understand.

2 6

[Dovecot] dovecot support ms-tnef mail parser?
by DongYu.Zhen 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

Hello everybody, I used iRedMail Server with dovecot-1.2.0. I used OutLook2007 send a RTF mail and the mail can't be parsed normal. In dovecot maildir storage the mail body appeared ,/ / /------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CD52BC.99E1BE10 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat"/ How to parse ms-tnef mail by dovecot? Thank you.

3 2

[Dovecot] 2.1.7 TLS issues
by Christian Rößner 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

Hi, I have an interesting problem: I am building dovecot packages for Ubuntu since 10.04. Never had bigger trouble with it. Now since 2.1.6 or 2.1.7 (I can not say more precisely), Thunderbird 10ESR and Outlook 2010 can no longer use 143/TLS correctly. Automx delvers 143/TLS and Outlook tells me that it can not create a secure connection. I changed automx to use 993/SSL and everything works. Under Thunderbird 10ESR, I get a box that tells me that I need to change settings. When I sent mail, TB told me that it could not copy the mail to the sent folder. I also changed to 993/SSL and everything is perfect. At the other and, Apples Mail.app and iOS devices work perfectly over 143/TLS. So my guess is that it has to do with OpenSSL. Did something change in dovecot concerning TLS? Can I change options in the built process? Thanks in advance -Christian Rößner --- Roessner-Network-Solutions Bachelor of Science Informatik Nahrungsberg 81, 35390 Gießen F: +49 641 5879091, M: +49 176 93118939 USt-IdNr.: DE225643613 http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com

5 10

[Dovecot] The deleted_to_trash Plugin (workaround Outlook 2007 behaviour)
by J E Lyon 24 Jun '12

24 Jun '12

Hi, I see the plugin exists for v1 & v2, all very interesting... Surprised no one seems to have created an RPM and it looks like deleted_to_trash is one of the very few plugins to not be shipped as part of the default install with CentOS 5.5 or CentOS 6 (i.e. Dovecot v1 & v2 respectively.) Am I missing something, or does everyone really build from source? Thanks, James.

1 0