- dovecot - dovecot.org

director implementation
by Gonzalo Palacios Goicolea 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi All, We're going to put into production dovecot-director. As I wrote in a previous message, we have a lot of errors like these: Feb 28 08:50:42 server5 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: Index path/Maildir/dovecot.index: Lost log for seq=5 offset=228: Missing middle file seq=5 (between 5..4294967295, we have seqs 4): Log is locked - newer log can't exist (initial_mapped=1, reason=Index mapped) Feb 28 08:50:42 server5 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Warning: fscking index file path/Maildir/dovecot.index Feb 28 08:50:42 server5 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: Failed to map transaction log path/Maildir/dovecot.index.log at sync_offset=10328 after locking: pread() failed: Stale file handle Feb 28 08:50:42 server5 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: Index path/Maildir/dovecot.index: Lost log for seq=5 offset=228: Missing middle file seq=5 (between 5..4294967295, we have seqs 4): Requested newer log than exists - still after NFS flush: Log inode is unchanged (initial_mapped=1, reason=Index mapped) Feb 28 08:50:45 server5 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: Failed to map transaction log path/Maildir/dovecot.index.log at sync_offset=10328 after locking: pread() failed: Stale file handle Feb 28 08:50:45 server5 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: Failed to map view for path/Maildir/dovecot.index: Missing middle file seq=5 (between 5..5, we have seqs 4): Requested newer log than exists - still after NFS flush: Log inode is unchanged My doubt is if it's recommended to delete all dovecot.index* files before passing the traffic through de director servers or it's not required. Any information on this way will be appreciated. We've dovecot-2.2.36-8.el7.x86_64 over RHEL7 Thanks and best regards -- *Gonzalo Palacios Goicolea* U.T de Infraestructura de Equipos Centrales /Tecnologías de la Información/ Universidad Autónoma de Madrid • Campus de Cantoblanco <3D"http://www.uam.es/"> Antes de imprimir este correo piense si es necesario.Cuidemos el medioambiente.

2 1

not getting internal errors logged
by Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello. dovecot 2.3.13, 2.3.14 web imap client when doing search is getting error induced by me by deleting lucene-indexes folder: UID SEARCH: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2021-03-08 15:08:01] (0.002 + 0.000 + 0.001 secs). but I'm not getting that internal error logged in syslog. Other information like from lmtp, imap logging in, out etc is logged just fine. In my configs log_path info_log_path debug_log_path are not set, so dovecot default syslog is used. Tested log_path = /tmp/file.txt, too but the effect was the same (regular logs logged there, internal errors not logged) stracing dovecot process I see error message only write()n once (to client) but nowhere else (in a strace visible way). Is anything else controlling internal errors logging? Can't find anything in docs. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

1 0

Mailbox configuration questions
by justina colmena ~biz 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

I am having subtle problems with IMAP mailbox configuration on certain clients such as KMail and Thunderbird, whereas the previous setup was working on K9Mail (mobile) and Trojitá (desktop). I was using Maildir folders, which were mostly working before, but for some reason I had to create explicitly named namespaces for the flatfile (mbox) Inbox and the Maildir "Home" folders. I also specified an INDEX directory for the inboxes, which I made world-writable and sticky, because of permission problems creating subdirectories in it. KMail always seems to put sent mail into a local "sent-mail" folder, rather than the IMAP Sent folder associated with the sending account. (KMail and Thunderbird have a more POP-oriented architecture for the desktop, whereas Trojitá is exclusively IMAP.) Is there an easier better way to organize some of this stuff? Or how is it "usually" done?

3 2

Re: Re: v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
by Roland Martinez 05 Mar '21

05 Mar '21

1 0

Where can I contact with this list administrator?
by Ángel L. Mateo 05 Mar '21

05 Mar '21

Hi, I'm having problems with some emails receive from this list. Problems related with DMARC. How can I contact with this list administrator to try to fix it? -- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) http://www.um.es/atica Tfo: 868889150 Fax: 868888337

3 2

last login plugins
by Henry 05 Mar '21

05 Mar '21

Anyone kwon the last-login plugins can using Authentication variables such as %m mechanism, %a local_port . we want to record this in DB, thanks

3 21

About TLS variables
by Henry 04 Mar '21

04 Mar '21

Hello, I found the Variable %c only has TLS, Can it be using "TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3" instead of only TLS like as dovecot logging, this is really a most meaningful , thanks Variable %cLong name securedDescription “TLS” with established SSL/TLS connections, “TLS handshaking”, or “TLS [handshaking]: error text” if disconnecting due to TLS error. “secured” with localhost connections. Otherwise empty.

2 2

Re: Bug in renaming folder hierarchies - any reaction ?
by Klaus Steinberger 04 Mar '21

04 Mar '21

Hi, no comments on this? This is definitly with two different IMAP Clients reproducible. This led already to some message loss in user Mailboxes. > we discovered a major problem with renaming folders with subfolders > > testszenario: > > folders: > > test1 > test1/test1-1 > test1/test1-2 > > all 3 folders contain a test message > > after renaming the top level folder test1 to test2 following folders exist: > > test2 > test2/test1-1 > test2/test1-2 > > the subfolders test1-1 and test1-2 are empty, the top level folder contains the > correct message. > > > Now renmaing test2 back to test1: > > Alle folders again contain their messages. > > So this looks like during renaming the top level folder just the message > references for the subfolders got lost, and with renaming back they are there again. > > I can reproduce this behavior both with thunderbird and Horde Webmail as a > client, also it happens with a second different dovecot setup > Sincerly, Klaus Steinberger

2 7

Pigeonhole v0.5.14 released
by Aki Tuomi 04 Mar '21

04 Mar '21

Hi! We are pleased to release v0.5.14 of Pigeonhole. Please find source tarballs at https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.14.t… https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.14.t… Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange oy --- * IMAP FILTER command: cmd-filter-sieve - Do not allow NIL as script name argument.

1 0

Why Last-login?
by ＠lbutlr 04 Mar '21

04 Mar '21

I've noticed several threads over the last year or so about last-login, and I was curious WHY people care about tracking this in the database. I can see wanting to know if a user has logged in recently, but this seems quite easy to tell by simply looking at the time stamp and/or contents of the mail spool for the user. For example, on my system I can look at the timestamps on the 'new' folders in the user's maildir to see if they are getting mail, and if the folders are empty, I have a time stamp of when they last checked that mailbox, giving me a pretty accurate time for when they last logged in. For example, looking at one user: # ls -lsdtr /path/to/user/maildir/{new,.**/new} I can see that the most recent "new" mailboxes were accessed on 02 Mar 14:25 and 03 Mar 01:45, and I can see that the latter mailbox has files in it and the former mailbox does not (just by the size, without doing an extra ls of those directories), so I know that the last time the user logged in was about 14:25 or later yesterday and that they definitely have not logged in in the last 3h05, which seems close enough to me. Am I missing some reason I would need/want to keep track of that specific login time separately? -- 'But you ain't part of it, are you?' said Granny conversationally. 'You try, but you always find yourself watchin' yourself watchin' people, eh? Never quite believin' anything? Thinkin' the wrong thoughts?'

7 12