- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Disconnected Log messages I'd like to disable?
by dovecot＠corwyn.net 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

I regularly get this message in my logs: Feb 9 08:03:59 mailserver dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<user(a)example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=24.213.158.249, lip=192.168.250.80, TLS Feb 9 08:04:49 mailserver dovecot: IMAP(user(a)example.com): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=189/468 Feb 9 08:06:09 mailserver dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<user(a)example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=24.213.158.249, lip=192.168.250.80, TLS Feb 9 08:06:52 mailserver dovecot: IMAP(user(a)example.com): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=479/51185 Feb 9 08:06:52 mailserver dovecot: IMAP(user(a)example.com): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=479/51185 (which I think is from my blackberry users) I'd like to not log Feb 9 08:06:52 mailserver dovecot: IMAP(user(a)example.com): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=479/51185 Suggestions? rick Rick Steeves http://www.sinister.net "The journey is the destination"

2 1

[Dovecot] v1.1.11 released
by Timo Sirainen 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11.tar.gz.sig Hopefully this v1.1 release will last a few months. - IMAP: PERMANENTFLAGS list didn't contain \*, causing some clients not to save keywords. - dbox: INTERNALDATE and save date was returned wrong for converted maildir files. - auth: Using "username" or "domain" passdb fields caused problems with cache and blocking passdbs in v1.1.8 .. v1.1.10. - userdb prefetch + blocking passdbs was broken with non-plaintext auth in v1.1.8 .. v1.1.10. - If mail_chroot is set, don't fail at startup in dump-capability.

10 16

[Dovecot] Maildir structure question
by Nicolas KOWALSKI 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Hello, About the INBOX location when using maildir, in the wiki, http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, I can read: " Directory Structure ~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain the messages for INBOX. The tmp directory is used during delivery, new messages arrive in new and read shall be moved to cur by the clients. " But in my Maildir, I see this: niko@petole:~$ ls -la Maildir/ total 144 drwxr-xr-x 35 niko niko 4096 2009-02-06 08:37 . drwxr-xr-x 25 niko niko 4096 2009-02-06 10:26 .. drwxr-xr-x 5 niko niko 4096 2009-02-06 09:16 .INBOX ... There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directories in ~/Maildir, as written in the wiki, but instead this .INBOX directory which contains these 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp'. Is this expected ? Thanks. My configuration: petole:~# dovecot -n # 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.28.3 i686 Debian 4.0 ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/certs/petole.demisel.net.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/ssl/private/petole.demisel.net.pem login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login mail_location: maildir:~/Maildir namespace: type: private separator: / list: yes subscriptions: yes auth default: passdb: driver: pam userdb: driver: passwd socket: type: listen master: path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mode: 384 -- Nicolas

3 8

[Dovecot] Best Imap Transfer Tool?
by Neil 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

So I'm looking to do a migration of my IMAP mailboxes, and I'm looking for the best tool to use. I used to use the uw-mailutil tool, a while ago, but that was a bit coarse of a tool. More recently I've used imapsync, but that was giving me some errors. I've sort of tracked those down; but I was wondering if anyone else had any other recommendations...? Thanks.

2 2

[Dovecot] Migrating mail between servers
by Knute Johnson 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

I've currently got dovecot running on a Fedora server and I want to move all my mail to my new server running ubuntu. Both use mbox and I have IMAP working in both. Can I just copy the ~user/mail directory and /var/mail/user file and replace them in the new server? Thanks, -- Knute Johnson "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H.L. Mencken

3 2

[Dovecot] FreeBSD pam auth problems
by Dmitry Samersoff 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

I'm impressed by dovecto and try to upgrade my home system from wu-imapd running there for last 5 years to dovecot. It's straghtforward FreeBSD setup with ssl-only auth, inboxes in /var/mail and user mail under %h/Mail But I get some strange error: Fatal: userdb didn't return a home directory, but mail location used it (%h): %h/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u Thank you in advance! -Dmitry mircat:dovecot#./sbin/dovecot -n # 1.1.10: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE i386 base_dir: /var/run/dovecot log_path: /var/log/dovecot_main.log info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot_info.log listen: *:143 ssl_listen: *:993 disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_user: nobody login_chroot: no login_max_processes_count: 30 max_mail_processes: 30 first_valid_uid: 1 mail_uid: smmsp mail_gid: smmsp mail_location: mbox:%h/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mail_debug: yes mbox_lazy_writes: no auth default: failure_delay: 1 verbose: yes debug: yes worker_max_request_count: 1 passdb: driver: pam args: imap -- Dmitry Samersoff dms(a)samersoff.net, http://devnull.samersoff.net * There will come soft rains ...

2 4

[Dovecot] Info regarding conversion of mbox to maildir
by Scott Silva 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

When I finally decide to convert to maildir, will I have to set up namespaces during the conversion, or will dovecot figure out where everything is by itself? Should I set up deliver to go to maildir/ globally, or per user? I have considered using the convert plugin, if there are not a lot of negatives. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

2 3

[Dovecot] Public namespace permissions documentation/questions
by Thomas Hummel 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Hello Timo, In my trials to setup a shared namespace with dovecot-1.1.8/LDAP passdb/userdb (prefetch)/Maildir, I found out that : 1) ACL are mandatory (at least if the acl plugin is triggered in dovecot.conf) Am I correct ? I'm still not sure if we can do without ACL at all (only with unix permissions and system_user userdb extra field). 2) the system_user userdb extra field is supposed to be ...the logname of the user the secondary groups of whom we want to check ! i.e. if user foobar belongs to secondary groups foogid, zgid, wgid and doveshared uid=xxx(foobar) gid=yyy(foogid) groups=zzz(zgid),www(wgid),vvv(doveshared) and we dovecot to take them into account, we have to make the usedb return the system_user extra field with the value foobar. Seems obvious now and said this way, but looking at the wiki : "system_user: If this is given, the user's groups are read from /etc/group (or wherever NSS is configured to taken them from)." I thought 'system_user' was a flag (a boolean) which, when triggered made dovecot look for the secondaries group of the user (user whose name is already known). a) am I correct ? b) why isn't system_user such a boolean ? Is there a case where we'd want system_user to be different than the user dovecot runs as at the moment the check takes place ? 3) same idea with acl_groups : since this extra_field holds a list of groups for the ACL plugin, why not rely on the native unix groups of the system the user belong to ? Thanks (and sorry for the 2 previous threads where I was blindly confused by the system_user thing). -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel(a)pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau

2 1

[Dovecot] dovecot-shared file
by Thomas Hummel 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Hello Timo, About the dovecot-shared file, the wiki says : "Unless you're using a single UID for all the users, you'll need to have a dovecot-shared file in each shared maildir. The group and the file permissions for new files inside the maildir are taken from the dovecot-shared file." but says the following too : "With Maildir dovecot-shared file controls if the \Seen flags are shared or private. If you don't have the file, they're shared." The question is "does it make sense (or is it even possible) not to have the file ?". Why would one not have the file and how would it work then ? By relying on the set-gid bit and umask ? Finally, the wiki says : "If you do have the file, the \Seen flag state is stored only in the user's index files. By making each user have their own private index files, you can make the \Seen flag private for the users." So, my undersanding is that : 1) you have the file 1.a) if INDEX points to the same place, flags are shared but are lost if indexes are lost 1.b) if INDEX points to some user dependant place, flags are private but are lost if indexes are lost 2) you don't have the file flags are shared, whatever INDEX points to and, since they're stored in filename, survive indexes lost. but does shared-mailboxes even work if we don't have that file ? maybe only if the set-gid bit and umask does what the file would have done ? So maybe, if you want to share flags, 2) is safer dans if you want them private, 1.b) is the only choice ? thanks -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel(a)pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau

2 1

[Dovecot] Shared subscription, acl-list and uidvalidity(s)
by Thomas Hummel 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Hello, I'm running dovecot-1.1.8/Maildir/ACL plugin. I sucessfully set up a Maildir shared between users of the unix group 'doveshared' via a public namespace, unix permissions and ACL files. The location of my public namespace is /path/to/public. I tried 2 sub-setups : First setup ---------- drwxrws--- 4 root doveshared 4096 Jan 30 13:39 public -rw-r----- 1 root doveshared 18 Jan 30 13:38 public/subscriptions I first connect (in Thunderbird) to dovecot with user 'hummel', then with user 'doveimap'. The following files are created in /path/to/public/ : -rw------- 1 doveimap doveshared 40 Jan 30 14:03 dovecot-acl-list -rw------- 1 hummel doveshared 8 Jan 30 14:03 dovecot-uidvalidity -rw------- 1 hummel doveshared 0 Jan 30 14:02 dovecot-uidvalidity.4982fa7a I've got my own idea about what they're used for, but can you explain what they are supposed to be ? I guess the uidvalidity files are UIDVALIDITY, not for the mailboxes the namespace holds (since my understanding is that the uidvalidities of mailboxes are stored in the first line of dovecot-uidlist files), but for the namespace itself (in case it is destroyed and then recreated for instance). Am I right ? Why 2 files ? Second setup ------------- I follow the 'Shared subscriptions' section of the wiki : drw-r-s--- 4 root doveshared 4096 Jan 30 14:19 public -rw-r----- 1 root doveshared 18 Jan 30 13:38 public/subscriptions As expected, dovecot (and it shows in the logs), has not sufficient permissions to create the files above (dovecot-acl-list, dovecot-uidvalidity, dovecot-uidvalidity.4982fa7a). What are the consequences ? Thanks. -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel(a)pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau

2 3